Skip to content

Multicentre Phase III Erythropoietic Protoporphyria Study

A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutanenous Bioresorbable CUV1647 Implants in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04053270
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-08-12
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2009-12-09
Last updated
2019-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria

Keywords

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria, EPP, Afamelanotide

Brief summary

This was a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous bioresorbable afamelanotide implants in patients with Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP). The study was conducted with two parallel study arms with crossover between treatments every 60 days. Eligible patients were randomised to a treatment group, and received implants of active treatment (afamelanotide 16mg) or placebo, in an alternating crossover fashion according to the following dosing regime: * Group A was administered active implants on Days 0, 120, 240 and placebo implants on Days 60, 180, 300 * Group B was administered placebo implants on Days 0, 120, 240 and active implants on Days 60, 180, 300

Detailed description

Afamelanotide is a man-made drug being studied for use as a preventative medication for Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP) sufferers. It is a synthetically produced analogue of human alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH). The study will involve the use of an implant, which comes in the form of a small rod to be administered under the skin. The implant may contain the study drug afamelanotide or a placebo (inactive medication). This study aims to provide insight into the effectiveness of afamelanotide under normal conditions of use in EPP patients.

Interventions

16mg subcutaneous implant

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo subcutaneous implant

Sponsors

Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients with a diagnosis of EPP (confirmed by elevated free protoporphyrin in peripheral erythrocytes) of sufficient severity that they have requested treatment to alleviate their symptoms. * Aged 18-70 years. * Written informed consent prior to the performance of any study-specific procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Any allergy to afamelanotide or the polymer contained in the implant or to lignocaine or other local anaesthetic used during the administration of study medication. * EPP patients with significant hepatic involvement. * Personal history of melanoma or dysplastic nevus syndrome. * Current Bowen's disease, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or other malignant or premalignant skin lesions. * Any other photodermatosis such as PLE, DLE or solar urticaria. * Diagnosed with HIV/AIDS or hepatitis. * Any evidence of clinically significant organ dysfunction or any clinically significant deviation from normal in the clinical or laboratory determinations. * Acute history of drug or alcohol abuse (in the last 12 months). * History of disorders of the gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine (including diabetes, Cushing's syndrome, Addison's disease, Peutz-Jeagher syndrome), neurological (including seizures), haematological (especially anaemia of less than 10 g/100 mL) or systemic disease judged to be clinically significant by the Investigator. * Major medical or psychiatric illness * Patient assessed as not suitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. noncompliance history allergic to local anaesthetics, faints when given injections or giving blood). * Female who was pregnant (confirmed by positive serum β-HCG pregnancy test prior to baseline) or lactating. * Females of child-bearing potential (pre-menopausal, not surgically sterile) not using adequate contraceptive measures (i.e. oral contraceptives, diaphragm plus spermicide, intrauterine device). * Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational agent within 30 days prior to the screening visit. * Use of regular medications as specified in protocol Section 5.4 Prior and Concomitant Therapy. * Any factors that may affect skin reflectance measurements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)0-360 days or Early TerminationThe cumulative number of days where a phototoxic reaction occurred was recorded in the patient diary. The reported data represent a cumulative total for days of phototoxic reactions. The participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert Pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The primary analysis population for efficacy was revised, to analyze only participants who reported cumulative total Likert pain scores of at least 26 during the study (0-360 days). This population, which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population. Participants with less than 26 Likert pain scores were not included in the analysis.
The Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)0-360 days or Early TerminationThe mean number of phototoxic reactions that occurred whilst patients were on active compared with placebo implants. The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The primary analysis population for efficacy was revised, to analyze only participants who reported a cumulative total Likert pain score of at least 26 during the study (0-360 days). This population, which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population. Participants with less than 26 Likert pain scores were not included in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)0-360 days or Early TerminationThe number of days with sunlight exposure was recorded in the patient diary. The sunlight exposures were divided into the following categories: none, \< 1 hour, 1 to 3 hours, 3 to 6 hours and \> 6 hours per day.
Skin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day0, Day14, Day30, Day60, Day74, Day90, Day120, Day150, Day180, Day210, Day240, Day270, Day300, Day330, Day360 or Early TerminationChanges in melanin density (MD) (measured by spectrophotometry) at each visit by group. Participants had their skin pigmentation measured by a non-invasive quantitative skin chromaticity (reflectance) reading. Reflectance by the skin of light measured at the wavelengths of 400 nm and 420 nm was recorded using a Minolta cm-2500d spectrophotometer at the following skin sites: forehead, left cheek, right inside upper arm, left medial forearm, right side of abdomen (avoiding implant insertion site), left side of sacral region/buttock. Melanin density was determined for each skin site using the method of Dwyer et al 1998.
Change in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay0, Day60, Day120, Day180, Day240, Day300, Day360 or Early TerminationThe Summary of SF36 change from Baseline of Physical Component Score (PCS) to the scores during treatment on Days 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 using the SF36 questionnaire. The SF-36 (The Short Form 36 Health Survey) consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in each section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The higher scores represent better health-related quality-of-life.
Change in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay0, Day60, Day120, Day180, Day240, Day300, Day360 or Early TerminationThe Summary of SF36 change from Baseline of Mental Component Score (MCS) to the scores during treatment on Days 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 using the SF36 questionnaire. The SF-36 (The Short Form 36 Health Survey) consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in each section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The higher scores represent better health-related quality-of-life.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A
Group A was administered active implants on Days 0, 120, 240 and placebo implants on Days 60, 180, 300 Afamelanotide: 16mg subcutaneous implant Placebo: Placebo subcutaneous implant
49
Group B
Group B was administered placebo implants on Days 0, 120, 240 and active implants on Days 60, 180, 300 Afamelanotide: 16mg subcutaneous implant Placebo: Placebo subcutaneous implant
51
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup BTotalGroup A
Age, Customized
Age
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
50 Participants99 Participants49 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants53 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants47 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
94 / 10088 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1003 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)

The cumulative number of days where a phototoxic reaction occurred was recorded in the patient diary. The reported data represent a cumulative total for days of phototoxic reactions. The participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert Pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The primary analysis population for efficacy was revised, to analyze only participants who reported cumulative total Likert pain scores of at least 26 during the study (0-360 days). This population, which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population. Participants with less than 26 Likert pain scores were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: 0-360 days or Early Termination

Population: Participants who reported a cumulative total Likert pain score of at least 26 during the study (0-360 days), which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Severe Pain39 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Moderate Pain129 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Mild Pain1126 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)No Pain8650 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)No Pain8484 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Severe Pain45 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Mild Pain1237 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Moderate Pain179 Days
Primary

The Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)

The mean number of phototoxic reactions that occurred whilst patients were on active compared with placebo implants. The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The primary analysis population for efficacy was revised, to analyze only participants who reported a cumulative total Likert pain score of at least 26 during the study (0-360 days). This population, which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population. Participants with less than 26 Likert pain scores were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: 0-360 days or Early Termination

Population: The result is reported in a per sequence format with the different time points at which the interventions were switched.~Total of 60 Participants: 32 participants in Group A and 28 participants in Group B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 01.44 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 3.25
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 600.56 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 1.87
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 1201.09 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 2.08
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 1800.32 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 2.07
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 2400.63 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 1.52
AfamelanotideThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 3000.72 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 1.42
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 2402.21 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 3.57
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 02.64 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 5.33
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 1800.78 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 600.11 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 0.31
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 3001.96 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 4.53
PlaceboThe Mean Number of Phototoxic Reactions (Study Efficacy Population)Day 1200.79 counts of episodesStandard Deviation 2.25
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers Population

The Summary of SF36 change from Baseline of Mental Component Score (MCS) to the scores during treatment on Days 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 using the SF36 questionnaire. The SF-36 (The Short Form 36 Health Survey) consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in each section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The higher scores represent better health-related quality-of-life.

Time frame: Day0, Day60, Day120, Day180, Day240, Day300, Day360 or Early Termination

Population: The secondary analysis population for efficacy included those subjects who received all required doses of investigational product. This population, which was comprised of 93 patients, is identified as the study completers population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 12053.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 24051.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.48
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 6052.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 30052.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 18053.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 36052.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 051.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 36052.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 053.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 6052.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.46
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 12052.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 18052.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 24052.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.07
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Mental Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 30052.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.61
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers Population

The Summary of SF36 change from Baseline of Physical Component Score (PCS) to the scores during treatment on Days 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 using the SF36 questionnaire. The SF-36 (The Short Form 36 Health Survey) consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in each section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The higher scores represent better health-related quality-of-life.

Time frame: Day0, Day60, Day120, Day180, Day240, Day300, Day360 or Early Termination

Population: The secondary analysis population for efficacy included those subjects who received all required doses of investigational product. This population, which was comprised of 93 patients, is identified as the study completers population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 12054.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.53
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 24053.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 6054.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 30053.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.71
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 18053.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.88
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 36052.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.03
AfamelanotideChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 051.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.05
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 36054.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.01
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 054.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 6054.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 12054.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 18053.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 24054.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Using SF36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score) for Study Completers PopulationDay 30053.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)

The number of days with sunlight exposure was recorded in the patient diary. The sunlight exposures were divided into the following categories: none, \< 1 hour, 1 to 3 hours, 3 to 6 hours and \> 6 hours per day.

Time frame: 0-360 days or Early Termination

Population: The primary analysis population for efficacy was revised, with an additional criterion of a total cumulative pain score of at least 26, and omitting patients who did not complete the study. This population, which was comprised of 60 patients, is identified as the Efficacy population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)3 - 6 hrs per day969 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)< 1 hr per day1468 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)1 - 3 hrs per day2810 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)None per day4358 Days
AfamelanotideCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)> 6 hrs per day339 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)None per day4582 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)> 6 hrs per day250 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)3 - 6 hrs per day854 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)1 - 3 hrs per day2695 Days
PlaceboCumulative Number of Days With Sunlight Exposure (Study Efficacy Population)< 1 hr per day1564 Days
Secondary

Skin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)

Changes in melanin density (MD) (measured by spectrophotometry) at each visit by group. Participants had their skin pigmentation measured by a non-invasive quantitative skin chromaticity (reflectance) reading. Reflectance by the skin of light measured at the wavelengths of 400 nm and 420 nm was recorded using a Minolta cm-2500d spectrophotometer at the following skin sites: forehead, left cheek, right inside upper arm, left medial forearm, right side of abdomen (avoiding implant insertion site), left side of sacral region/buttock. Melanin density was determined for each skin site using the method of Dwyer et al 1998.

Time frame: Day0, Day14, Day30, Day60, Day74, Day90, Day120, Day150, Day180, Day210, Day240, Day270, Day300, Day330, Day360 or Early Termination

Population: The secondary analysis population for efficacy included those subjects who received all required doses of investigational product. This population is identified as the study completers population.~Calculated MD \<0 or \>6 were omitted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 03.42 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.83
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 143.75 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.77
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 303.86 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.72
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 603.80 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.77
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 743.70 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.85
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 903.67 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.8
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1203.52 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.79
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1503.79 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.82
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1803.84 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.74
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2103.76 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.76
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2403.68 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.81
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2703.97 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.72
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3003.89 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.72
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3303.82 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.73
AfamelanotideSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3603.73 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2403.89 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.73
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 03.22 unitlessStandard Deviation 1.01
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1503.57 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.89
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 143.39 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.95
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3603.97 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 303.40 unitlessStandard Deviation 1.01
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1803.50 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.89
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3003.76 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 603.34 unitlessStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2703.81 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 743.71 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.89
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 2103.93 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.75
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 903.75 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.87
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 3304.08 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.63
PlaceboSkin Melanin Density (Study Completers Population)Day 1203.71 unitlessStandard Deviation 0.83

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026