Skip to content

Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin

The Efficacy Of A Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant As Compared To A Conventional Resin Regarding Its Retention, Marginal Integrity And Prevention Of Lesion Progression. A Randomized Clinical Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04052802
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-08-12
Start date
2019-08-30
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2019-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Demineralization, Fissure, Demineralization, Tooth, Non-Cavitated Caries

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the retention, marginal integrity and potential to prevent lesion progression of a bioactive resin material compared to a conventional resin-based flowable composite during management of initial carious lesion in adult population over an 18 months period.

Detailed description

Bio-active resin materials aim to possess the mechanical properties of resin materials in terms of higher wear resistance and dimensional stability over time. They also aim to mimic the biological activity of glass ionomers in terms of ion recharge and release. These new bio-active resin materials, with their lower particle size and better adaptability and polishability, might offer a substantial addition as fissure sealants if they fulfil the requisities satisfactory mechanical properties of resins and of ion recharge and release of glass ionomers. The study will be conducted on demineralized fissures of permanent molars by application of a newly introduced giomer in one group while the other group will recieve a conventional resin material where they will be assessed for retention, marginal integrity and caries progression.

Interventions

The materials will be applied to the demineralized fissures as stated in manufacturer's instructions

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with good oral hygiene * Co-operative patients with initially demineralized fissures in permanent molars of the maxilla or mandible

Exclusion criteria

* Medical Problems or Pregnancy * Lack of patient's approval and compliance * Presence of abnormal oral, medical, or mental condition * Known allergy of resin-based materials * Previous placements of sealants or restorations * Bruxism or mal-occlusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention18 monthsThe sealing materials will be assessed for complete, partial or no retention. The assessment will be carried out by visual and tactile assessments and calculated as a percentage of the total sample.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal integrity18 monthsThe materials margins will be assessed for their marginal seal using FDI criteria using a WHO probe. Scoring will be made from 1-5 by FDI criteria then statistically analyzed
Caries progression18 monthsThe demineralized fissures will be monitored for caries arrest or progression. The assessment will be made by ICDAS II criteria comparing the scores from baseline.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026