Skip to content

Robot-assisted Cognitive Training for Lonely Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Robot-Assisted Cognitive Training for Socially Isolated Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04051918
Acronym
MCI
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-08-09
Start date
2021-10-07
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Cognitive Change, Cognitive Impairment, Mild

Keywords

cognitive training, socially assistive robotics, music learning

Brief summary

This study will use a socially assistive robot to deliver cognitive training in the form of a music (piano) learning intervention to socially isolated older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Detailed description

Cognitive training has been shown in past research to improve cognitive function in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Music learning has been previously shown to be a particularly effective form of cognitive training: in addition to the cognitive demands of learning notation, hand positioning, coordination and timing, those who engage in music learning also benefit from emotional connection to the music and social engagement with a music teacher. Not all older adults are able to access music lessons. Older adults who are homebound, live in rural areas and do not have access to reliable transportation (or a monthly income with sufficient funds for recurring payments for lessons) are unlikely to be able to access these benefits. Socially assistive robots that can deliver both education and companionship on an ongoing basis within the home environment may be a viable solution to these limitations. The purpose of this study is to deliver cognitive training in the form of a music (piano) learning intervention to older adults who are socially isolated, and who may be able to benefit from the cognitive training aspects of the intervention. A socially assistive robot will deliver the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPiano Training

Cognitive training via music learning

Sponsors

Applied Universal Dynamics, Corp.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Van Robotics, Inc.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Georgia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be able to speak, read and write in English with a high degree of fluency * Cumulative music learning experience \< 3 years * Able to sit upright for two hours at a time * Able to see images on a screen at a distance of approximately 20 inches * Must have independent transportation to and from the Institute of Gerontology, weekly, for 27 weeks * No hearing impairment beyond what is correctable via hearing aid * Must have a safe location in the home to store and use an 88-key keyboard + stand and piano bench * No more than mildly cognitively impaired: global deterioration scale no higher than 2-3; Clinical Dementia Rating Scale no higher than 0.5 (sum of boxes) * Must have a close companion, family member or loved one who can attend the first and last visit * Must be capable of providing informed consent (based on responses to questions on study purpose, tasks, benefits, incentives and risks). * Must have a computer or tablet that is connected to broadband internet, to be used three times over the course of the study * Must have access to an e-mail account that can be checked three times during the study

Exclusion criteria

* No previous diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or related dementias * No condition that limits movement of the hands or fingers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Verbal Memory Test6-monthsCorrect hits + Correct passes + Correct hits after 30-minute delay + Correct passes after 30-minute delay; higher score is better; items remembered from a word list that also contains distractors
Visual Memory Test6-monthsCorrect hits + Correct passes + Correct hits after 30-minute delay + Correct passes after 30-minute delay; higher score is better; images remembered from an image list that also contains distractors
Non-Verbal Reasoning Test6-monthscorrect responses - commission errors; higher score is better
Shifting Attention Test6-monthscorrect responses - errors; higher is better
Stroop Test6-months\[Simple RT \< (Complex RT Correct \*0.1)+Complex RT Correct\] AND \[Complex RT Correct \< ( Stroop RT Correct \*0.1)+Stroop RT Correct\] AND (Complex Correct \> Complex Errors) AND (Stroop Correct \> Stroop Errors)
Continuous Performance Test6-monthsCPT Correct Responses \>= 30 AND CPT Correct Responses \> CPT Commission Errors
Symbol Digit Coding Test6-monthsSDC Correct Responses \>= 20 AND Correct Responses \> Errors

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technology Acceptance - TAM36-monthshigher sore = greater acceptance
DeJong Loneliness Scale6-monthsHigher scores indicate more severe loneliness
NASA TLX6-monthsMeasures workload; higher score = more work

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global deterioration scale6-monthsStaging of cognitive impairment based on a structured clinical interview; higher score = more severe impairment

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026