Skip to content

Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS.

Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques (2% Lidocaine Infiltration vs. EMLA Cream Application) Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS. A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04050059
Enrollment
62
Registered
2019-08-08
Start date
2019-11-13
Completion date
2019-12-15
Last updated
2020-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Spinal, Pain, Pregnancy, Cesarean Section

Brief summary

Nowadays lower segment cesarean sections are preferably carried out under regional anesthesia due to multiple advantages. Local infiltration of lidocaine or any other anesthetic is used before lumber puncture in many centers to reduce needle stick pain. EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetic) cream is the combination of lidocaine and prilocaine which have been effectively used in few studies to reduce needle prick pain. We would like to see which analgesic pretreatment is superior in terms of reducing pain of spinal needle insertion and have better maternal satisfaction levels.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pain reduction and maternal satisfaction levels of two analgesic pretreatment modalities on pain reduction of spinal needle insertion i.e. 2% lidocaine infiltration and EMLA in patients undergoing elective LSCS. Hypothesis: Analgesic pre-treatment with EMLA is superior to local skin infiltration with lidocaine

Interventions

EMLA cream (5g tube Aspen pharma trading limited) will be applied topically in dose of 2.5 grams (half tube of cream) and area will be covered with tegaderm dressing. Application of EMLA will at least stay for 30 minutes before spinal needle insertion

In 2% lidocaine group infiltration (Xylocaine 2% Barrett Hodgson Pakistan Pvt limited), skin and subcutaneous tissue will be infiltrated with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) before spinal needle insertion

Sponsors

Aga Khan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All adult women undergoing elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* BMI of more than 35 kg/m2 * Contraindication to spinal anesthesia * Spinal deformity * Refusal of regional anesthesia * Patients with a history of back surgery * confirmed allergy to local anesthetics * More than three attempts of needle insertion for inducing spinal anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score (Subjective)After 10 minutes (right after spinal anesthesia procedure is complete)Visual Analogue Scale pain Score in cm
Pain Score (Objective)During spinal anesthesia procedureObjective scoring: 1= No pain 2 = Mild flinch 3 = Wince 4= Yelp 5= Pulled away
Maternal SatisfactionAfter 10 minutes (right after spinal anesthesia procedure is complete)Maternal Satisfaction Score (end of spinal anesthesia): Very Satisfied Satisfied No comments Unsatisfied Very Unsatisfied

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026