Skip to content

Developing a Patient Navigation Intervention for PrEP Continuum of Care Among Young Latino MSM (PrEParate)

Developing a Patient Navigation Intervention for PrEP Continuum of Care Among Young Latino MSM (PrEParate)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04048382
Enrollment
57
Registered
2019-08-07
Start date
2019-08-05
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2022-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV/AIDS

Keywords

HIV Seroprevalence, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, Patient Navigation

Brief summary

This study aims to help young Latino gay and bisexual men access sexual health information, including PrEP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the patient navigation or the usual care condition and followed for 6 months. The study will recruit self-identified Latino men between the ages of 18 and 29 who also identify as gay, bisexual, and/or have sex with other men, and report CDC defined HIV risk behaviors.

Detailed description

Reducing the number of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections is one of the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and an objective of Healthy People 2020. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are the most at risk group for contracting HIV in the U.S., comprising 67% of the total new HIV diagnoses in 2014. The HIV epidemic impacts some groups of MSM disproportionately, with Latino MSM comprising 25.1% of new HIV infections among MSM between the ages of 13 and 29 years. Moreover, between 2010 and 2014, incidence of HIV increased 13% among Latino MSM, while all other racial/ethnic MSM groups showed stable or decreasing trends, underscoring the vulnerability of HIV infection among Latino MSM. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a medication taken daily to reduce risk of becoming infected with HIV, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, and has demonstrated strong efficacy. When taken consistently, PrEP has been shown to reduce new incidence of HIV by 92%. Despite the promise of PrEP to transform HIV prevention, there remain significant barriers to PrEP use among those who would benefit the most, including low awareness, knowledge, medical mistrust, perceived high costs, lack of access, language barriers, low health literacy, and stigma. In a recent study conducted among 600 MSM between the ages of 18 and 29 years in Southern California, Latino MSM reported the lowest levels of use at 6.6%, compared to 9.8% and 13.9% for Black and White participants, respectively. Although Latino MSM reported the lowest use of PrEP, they also reported the greatest willingness to use PrEP compared to White and Black MSM. This discrepancy in willingness versus actual PrEP use among Latino MSM emphasizes the need to intervene to address barriers among this population. There are a number of different steps that individuals must take to initiate, regularly adhere to, and persist in taking PrEP, with each step in this cascade associated with its own unique barriers. One approach that has been used to address multiple barriers to adhering to recommended health care is patient navigation (PN). PN has been successfully utilized to facilitate access to healthcare among other Latino populations and peer PN may be an ideal intervention to aid in PrEP uptake among Latino MSM by assisting individuals in overcoming barriers to obtaining and using PrEP. To our knowledge, no known PN programs for PrEP have been developed or pilot tested specifically for Latino MSM. The proposed study will engage young Latino MSM, a population at substantial risk for HIV infection, to pilot-test a peer PN intervention designed to improve engagement and retention in PrEP care. The peer PN intervention will be pilot-tested by comparing it to receipt of usual medical care (UC) plus written information. Individuals randomized to PN will receive the services of a peer patient navigator who will collaborate with the patient, his partner(s), health care professionals, and support service professionals to improve awareness of PrEP, facilitate engagement and retention in PrEP care, and provide strategies for adherence to PrEP. PN will be compared to UC at a 3 and 6-month follow-ups to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the PN intervention, and the preliminary impact of the PN intervention on engagement in PrEP-related care and PrEP adherence. In response to RFA-MH-17-361 Improving the HIV PrEP Cascade-R34, the investigators propose: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the patient navigation intervention by comparing it to usual care to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact. The investigators plan to randomize 60 young Latino MSM participants to either the PN or UC condition and follow participants for 6 months. It is expected that the pilot test will provide information about the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study methods, in preparation for a future full-scale efficacy trial. In addition, the pilot test will evaluate its preliminary impact on 7 PrEP cascade-related outcomes (i.e., scheduled and attended PrEP consultation; PrEP prescription received; PrEP prescription filled; PrEP initiated; self-reported PrEP adherence; and PrEP follow-up medical appointment attended).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPatient Navigation

Spanish-English bilingual peer lay navigators hired by Family Health Centers of San Diego will provide the PN intervention during the study, trained using manuals developed in formative research and via the Patient Navigation Research Program training approach. Services will generally focus on: 1) overcoming community, health system, interpersonal, and individual barriers to accessing PrEP-related healthcare; 2) increasing each patient's knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy for initiating and adhering to PrEP; 3) improving communication between the patient and healthcare team through appointment scheduling and reminders; and 4) sexual risk reduction counseling.

OTHERUsual Care

The booklet given is a 2-page booklet including the following information: 1) overview of PrEP; 2) eligibility for PrEP; 3) efficacy of PrEP; 4) safety of PrEP; and 5) obtaining, initiating, and adhering to PrEP. Participants will also be provided with both verbal and written information regarding available sexual health and HIV prevention services, including PrEP, at Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD). Comprehensive HIV-prevention healthcare, including PrEP, is available to study participants at FHCSD at no or minimal cost. If a UC participant is diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, treatment and follow-up will be coordinated by FHCSD staff as per usual care procedures.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
San Diego State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 29 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 to 29 years 2. Identifies as male 3. Identifies as gay/bisexual or reports having sex with men in past 12 months 4. Identifies as Latino/Hispanic 5. Self-reports being HIV-uninfected 6. Resides in San Diego County, California 7. Speaks English or Spanish 8. Willing and able to provide informed consent 9. Willing to receive PrEP-related health care at FHCSD 10. Reports at least one HIV risk factor as informed by CDC guidelines 10a. MSM are at elevated risk for HIV (as per CDC) if they report one of the following: * an HIV-infected sexual partner * diagnosis of a bacterial STI within the past 12 months * engaging in condomless anal sex with a non-monogamous partner in the past 12 months * engaging in commercial sex work in the past 12 months * injection of illicit drugs and sharing of injection equipment in the past 12 months * engaging in drug treatment for injection drug use in the past 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

1\. HIV-infected

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants That Scheduled an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.3 monthsParticipants will be asked if they have scheduled an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
Percent of Participants That Attended an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.3 monthsParticipants will be asked if they have attended an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
Percent of Participants That Received a PrEP Prescription.3 monthsParticipants will be asked if they have received a PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
Percent of Participants That Filled Their PrEP Prescription.3 monthsParticipants will be asked if they have filled their PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
Percent of Participants That Initiated PrEP Use.3 monthsParticipants will be asked to self-report their PrEP initiation on a follow up questionnaire.
Percent of Participants That Adhered to PrEP Over the Past Seven Days for Participants That Initiated PrEP3 monthsParticipants will be asked to self-report their PrEP use over the past seven days on a follow up questionnaire.
Percent of Participants That Attended PrEP Follow-up Appointment.3 monthsParticipants will be asked if they have attended a PrEP follow-up appointment on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patient Navigation (PN)
This intervention consists of standardized health educational materials and manualized sessions that can be implemented based on a participant's stage in the PrEP continuum. The intervention will utilize bilingual peer lay navigators and also consist of barrier reduction strategies to assist individuals with implementing HIV prevention, including the use of PrEP. Patient Navigation: Spanish-English bilingual peer lay navigators hired by Family Health Centers of San Diego will provide the PN intervention during the study, trained using manuals developed in formative research and via the Patient Navigation Research Program training approach. Services will generally focus on: 1) overcoming community, health system, interpersonal, and individual barriers to accessing PrEP-related healthcare; 2) increasing each patient's knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy for initiating and adhering to PrEP; 3) improving communication between the patient and healthcare team through appointment scheduling and reminders; and 4) sexual risk reduction counseling.
28
Usual Care (UC)
Participants in this condition will receive the CDC's 2-page PrEP Information Sheet in the participant's preferred language (either English or Spanish). Usual Care: The booklet given is a 2-page booklet including the following information: 1) overview of PrEP; 2) eligibility for PrEP; 3) efficacy of PrEP; 4) safety of PrEP; and 5) obtaining, initiating, and adhering to PrEP. Participants will also be provided with both verbal and written information regarding available sexual health and HIV prevention services, including PrEP, at Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD). Comprehensive HIV-prevention healthcare, including PrEP, is available to study participants at FHCSD at no or minimal cost. If a UC participant is diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, treatment and follow-up will be coordinated by FHCSD staff as per usual care procedures.
29
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
3-Month Follow UpEnrolled but did not complete survey20
3-Month Follow UpWithdrawal by Subject01
6-Month Follow upEnrolled but did not complete survey20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care (UC)TotalPatient Navigation (PN)
Age, Continuous25.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.01
25.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.73
25.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
29 Participants57 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants57 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants57 Participants28 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
27 Participants51 Participants24 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-binary
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 281 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Participants That Adhered to PrEP Over the Past Seven Days for Participants That Initiated PrEP

Participants will be asked to self-report their PrEP use over the past seven days on a follow up questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: This question was displayed if Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP? was Yes. Number of participants analyzed= 34. Some participants obtained and/or filled a PrEP prescription outside of the 3-month follow up timeframe (i.e., prior to their previous assessment), but did not initiate PrEP use at that time. These participants responded No to obtaining/filling a PrEP prescription in the last 3-months, but Yes to initiating PrEP in the last 3 months, and had adherence to report.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Adhered to PrEP Over the Past Seven Days for Participants That Initiated PrEP8 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Adhered to PrEP Over the Past Seven Days for Participants That Initiated PrEP10 Participants
p-value: 0.19Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Participants That Attended an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.

Participants will be asked if they have attended an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of participants analyzed= 53 due to missing data. This question was displayed contingent on answering Yes to Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP?

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Attended an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.10 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Attended an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.11 Participants
p-value: 0.49Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Participants That Attended PrEP Follow-up Appointment.

Participants will be asked if they have attended a PrEP follow-up appointment on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Data was not collected due to a coding error, thus the number of participants analyzed was zero.

Primary

Percent of Participants That Filled Their PrEP Prescription.

Participants will be asked if they have filled their PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of participants analyzed= 54 due to missing data. This question was displayed if answer to Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP? was Yes. Some participants obtained a PrEP prescription outside of the 3-month follow up timeframe (i.e., prior to their previous assessment), but did not fill their prescription at that time. These participants responded No to obtaining a PrEP prescription in the last 3-months, but Yes to filling their prescription in the last 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Filled Their PrEP Prescription.11 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Filled Their PrEP Prescription.10 Participants
p-value: 0.65Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Participants That Initiated PrEP Use.

Participants will be asked to self-report their PrEP initiation on a follow up questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: This question was displayed contingent on answering Yes to Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP? Number of participants analyzed= 35. Some participants obtained and/or filled a PrEP prescription outside of the 3-month follow up timeframe (i.e., prior to their previous assessment), but did not initiate PrEP use at that time. These participants responded No to obtaining or filling a PrEP prescription in the last 3-months, but Yes to initiating PrEP in the last 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Initiated PrEP Use.11 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Initiated PrEP Use.12 Participants
p-value: 0.17Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Participants That Received a PrEP Prescription.

Participants will be asked if they have received a PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of participants analyzed= 53 due to missing data. This question was displayed contingent on answering Yes to Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP?

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Received a PrEP Prescription.12 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Received a PrEP Prescription.12 Participants
p-value: 0.91Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Participants That Scheduled an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.

Participants will be asked if they have scheduled an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire. It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of participants analyzed= 53 due to missing data. This question was displayed contingent on answering Yes to Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP?

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Navigation (PN)Percent of Participants That Scheduled an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.10 Participants
Usual Care (UC)Percent of Participants That Scheduled an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.11 Participants
p-value: 0.88Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026