Skip to content

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Medical Compression Bandage Application Techniques by Measuring Interface Pressures Depending on Whether or Not the Heel is Included in Patients With Open Venous Ulcers

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Medical Compression Bandage Application Techniques by Measuring Interface Pressures Depending on Whether or Not the Heel is Included in Patients With Open Venous Ulcers: Non-inferiority, Controlled, Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04046120
Acronym
COMPARACHILLE
Enrollment
102
Registered
2019-08-06
Start date
2019-10-11
Completion date
2022-06-03
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Ulcer

Keywords

varicose ulcer, compression bandages, patient compliance, heel, methods

Brief summary

The importance of wearing medical compression to heal the venous ulcer has already been shown. However, no studies have been carried out on variations in medical compression tape and their impact on interface pressures which explains the lack of consensus on how to lay, including or not to include the heel. Studies on adherence to patients with medical compression have been carried out showing that one of the determining factors is comfort. The investigators therefore wish to conduct a randomized open prospective quantitative study comparing these two modes: including or not the heel .

Interventions

OTHERHeel-free bandage

The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years old * Patient with at least one venous ulcer progressing for at least 4 weeks * Patient coming for a specialized outpatient consultation called "vascular wound" at Nantes University Hospital * Informed consent to participate in the study * Social security insurance affiliation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under guardianship * Patient with major cognitive disorders incompatible with follow-up of protocol * Pregnancy * Patient with an open leg ulcer with a Systolic Pressure Index \< 0.8

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interface Pressure at V3At V3 (i.e. between 4 to 8 weeks): 48h after the final bandagin (which occurs at V2)Compare the interface pressure measurements generated by a medical compression bandage between two groups of patients with open venous ulcer(s) : * experimental group: uncovered heel * control group: heel covered by the bandage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle CircumferenceDay 0 and the last day at V3 (between week 4 and week 8)Compare the evolution or appearance of an edema in the ankle. The circumference of the ankle is measured with a tape measure using a technique called the figure of 8.
Interface Pressure at V248 hours before the last visit of the protocol V3 (V3 which occurs between 4 to 8 weeks)Compare, between the two groups, the interface pressures measured during the installation of bandage at home by the home nurse (V2 follow-up visit), compared to the recommended pressures (30-40 mmHg)
Interface Pressure Between V2 and V3At V2 and at V3, 48 hours apart (V3 which occurs between 4 to 8 weeks)Compare, between the two groups, the evolution of interface pressures after 48 hours of bandage wear.
Patient Satisfaction: QuestionnaireAt the last visit of the protocol (Between 4 and 8 weeks)Between the two groups, compare patient satisfaction with a heterogeneous questionnaire. There is no scale or score. It is asked which type of bandage the patient prefers: with or without heel included?
Number of Bandage RepairsDay 0Evaluate the number of bandage repairs required to reach the recommended therapeutic pressure

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnne POTTIER

Nantes University Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

24 months of recruiting in hospital Each participant was followed between 4 to 6 weeks Recruitment began on the first inclusion : 10/11/2019 and the research ended with the last visite of the last patient on 06/03/2022. This study was designed as a monocentric, prospective, controlled, randomized in parallel groups, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible according to the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
44 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants
Age, Continuous77.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 01 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026