Skip to content

Trial Using CogWatch for Tea Making Training in Stroke Apraxia and Action Disorganisation Syndrome

Randomised Controlled Trial of a Task Model Approach (CogWatch) to Tea Making Training in Stroke Apraxia and Action Disorganisation Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04044911
Acronym
CogWatchTea
Enrollment
29
Registered
2019-08-05
Start date
2014-06-01
Completion date
2014-12-04
Last updated
2019-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apraxias, Stroke

Keywords

Activity of daily living, Stroke, Apraxia, Action of daily living, Cup of tea

Brief summary

Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. This study evaluates the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a gait training control condition.

Detailed description

Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome (AADS) after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADLs). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. This trial evaluates the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a stepping training control condition. Stroke survivors with AADS participate in a cross-over randomized controlled study. Participants attend five 1-hour tea making training sessions in which progress is monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system which implements a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model (CogWatch). In a control condition participants receive five 1-hour stepping sessions. Analysis compares tea making training with stepping training effects on error reduction and time taken in making 4 different tea types. A complex tea preparation task (making two different cups of tea simultaneously) is used to test for generalisation of training effects.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTask model (CogWatch)

Sponsors

University of Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Crossover randomized control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* greater than 2 months post stroke; medically stable; failing at least one of four praxis items in the Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS) or a document filing task.

Exclusion criteria

* recent stroke (less than 2 months post stroke); not medically stable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in tea making accuracy3 assessments over 12 weeksIn three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera. Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 8 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant. Change in tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of stepping.
Change in tea making speed3 assessments over 12 weeksIn three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera. Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The average completion time is used as a measure of speed for each participant. Change in tea making speed pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in tea making speed pre- and post-training of stepping.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tea making accuracy at follow-up2 assessments over 15 weeksIn a fourth, follow-up assessment session (7 or 15 weeks post-tea making training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making a cup of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 8 cups of tea, one at a time, comprising two of each of the following; black tea, black tea with sugar, tea with milk and tea with milk and sugar. Each trial is recorded with a video camera. Videos of the participants making simple tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 8 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant. Tea making accuracy at follow-up is compared with tea making accuracy post-training of tea making.
Change in complex tea making accuracy3 assessments over 12 weeksIn three assessment sessions (initial, post-phase 1 training, post-phase 2 training), participants are seated at a table with objects and ingredients required for making two cups of tea placed in standard positions. Participants are instructed to make 4 cups of tea, two at a time, comprising one cup with tea, lemon and 1 sugar cube and the other with tea, milk and 2 sweeteners. Each trial is recorded with a video camera. Videos of the participants making complex tea are analysed by a researcher blinded to the session definition. The summed errors across the 4 tea making trials at each assessment are used to provide a measure of accuracy for each participant. Change in complex tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of tea making is contrasted with change in complex tea making accuracy pre- and post-training of stepping.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026