Skip to content

Elongation Longitudinaux Avec Decoaption Osteo-Articulaire (ELDOA) in Lumbar Disc Protrusion

Effect of Elongation Longitudinaux Avec Decoaption Osteo-Articulaire Exercises in Lumbar Disc Protrusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04043611
Enrollment
29
Registered
2019-08-02
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2019-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Keywords

Lumbar Disc Protrusion, ELDOA, Oswestry Disability Index

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial will be to determine the effectiveness of ELDOA for treating lumbar disc protrusion. Two randomized groups of patients with lumbar disc protrusion will be treated with conservative physical therapy and the experimental group will be given ELDOA, in addition. Both, male and female patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be included. Patients having concurrent malignancy, infection, trauma or any bony deformity will be excluded

Detailed description

The study is aimed at determining the effects of ELDOA in treating disc protrusion at lumbar region and is being conducted in Max Rehab & Physical Therapy Centre Islamabad and Pakistan Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi (March 2019-June 2019). Sample size of the study is 34 with confidence interval of 95% and power of 0.8. 30 patients were screened and 29 were included in the study on the basis of inclusion criteria. Sealed envelope contained total 34 questionnaires, 17 for each group. Patients were allocated randomly on the basis of group mentioned on the Performa. Similar conservative rehabilitation protocol was designed for both control and experimental group except for experimental group had ELDOA Exercises in addition. Patients were examined at 1st visit before administration of any treatment and at 4th visit which was also the last one (after completing 4 sessions at alternate days). Baseline evaluation for demographics and symptomatology was taken. Self-reported questionnaire, ODI, NPRS, lumbar ROM and SLR were recorded at first and fourth visit for comparison. 26 patients completed the study while 1 patient from control group and 2 patients from experiment group were lost to follow up and were considered drop outs.

Interventions

OTHERConservative physical therapy management

Tens and hot pack for at least 10 minutes at low back Soft tissue mobilization (Myofascial Release Technique) Maitland's Lumbar segmental mobilization (Grade I & II for pain, Grade III & IV for ROM) Traction (Manual general traction) Neurodynamics (Tensioner technique) Home plan after session (Guided low back exercises):Active Stretching (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold), Hamstring, Piriformis McKenzie Prone Extension Exercises

OTHERELDOA

ELDOA positions (hold for 1 minute,4 alternate days a week) under supervision during session Conservative physical therapy management Tens and hot pack for at least 10 minutes at low back Soft tissue mobilization (Myofascial Release Technique) Maitland's Lumbar segmental mobilization (Grade I & II for pain, Grade III & IV for ROM) Traction (Manual general traction) Neurodynamics (Tensioner technique) Home plan after session (Guided low back exercises):Active Stretching (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold),Hamstring,Piriformis

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Limited ROM (hip/lumbar spine) * Pain more than 3 on NPRS * Pain ≥ 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent disc protrusion * Spondylolisthesis * Spondylosis * Malignancy * Infection * Trauma * Marked bony deformities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry disability index4th dayChanges from the Baseline, Oswestry disability index (ODI) was developed in order to assess disability related to pain in individuals with acute, sub-acute, or chronic LBP. The total score of ODI range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum disability). Scores from 0-20 to indicate minimal disability, 20-40 to indicate moderate disability, 40-60 to indicate severe disability, 60-80 to indicate housebound, and 80-100 to indicate bedbound. The ODI score is recommended as a back pain-specific measure of disability.
Numeric Pain rating scale4th dayChanges from the Baseline, Numeric Pain rating scale (NPRS) is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain.
Range of Motion (ROM) Lumbar Spine (Flexion)4th dayChanges from the Baseline, ROM of lumbar spine flexion was taken with the help of inclinometer
ROM Lumbar Spine (extension)4th dayROM of Lumbar spine extension was taken with the help of inclinometer
ROM Lumbar Spine (Right side flexion)4th dayROM of Lumbar spine right side flexion was taken with the help of inclinometer
ROM Lumbar Spine (left side Flexion)4th dayROM of Lumbar spine left side flexion was taken with the help of inclinometer
Straight Leg Raising (SLR)4th dayStraight Leg Raising range was taken with the help of inclinometer

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026