Skip to content

Olorinab in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Constipation (IBS-C) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Diarrhea (IBS-D)

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Olorinab in Subjects With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Experiencing Abdominal Pain

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04043455
Acronym
CAPTIVATE
Enrollment
273
Registered
2019-08-02
Start date
2019-07-24
Completion date
2021-04-29
Last updated
2025-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

Abdominal pain, Olorinab, APD371, Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), IBS-C (IBS with predominant constipation), IBS-D (IBS with predominant diarrhea)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether olorinab is a safe and effective treatment for abdominal pain in participants with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Interventions

Olorinab Dose 1 capsule or tablet by mouth, 3 times per day up to 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Olorinab matching placebo capsule or tablet by mouth, 3 times per day up to 12 weeks

Sponsors

Arena Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Study Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant constipation (IBS-C) or predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) according to Rome IV criteria at Visit 1 (Screening) * Per the Rome IV diagnostic algorithm for IBS, participants 50 years of age and over are to have had one of the following with a result that rules out causes of abdominal pain other than IBS: 1. Colonoscopy (within 10 years of Visit 1 \[Screening\]) 2. Flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema (within 5 years of Visit 1 \[Screening\]) 3. Computed tomography colonography (within 5 years of Visit 1 \[Screening\]) Main Study

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of IBS with mixed bowel habits (IBS-M) or unsubtyped IBS (IBS-U) * Clinically relevant changes in dietary, lifestyle, or exercise regimen within 30 days prior to Visit 1 (Screening) that may confound efficacy assessments in the clinical judgment of the Investigator (or designee) * Any colonic or major abdominal surgery (eg, bariatric surgery \[including gastric banding\], stomach surgery, small/large bowel surgery, or abdominal large vessel surgery). History of cholecystectomy is exclusionary for participants with IBS-D. For participants with IBS-C, a history of cholecystectomy more than 6 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening) is allowed. Procedures such as appendectomy, hysterectomy, caesarean section, or polypectomy are allowed as long as they have occurred at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening). Long-Term Extension Inclusion Criteria: •All participants must have completed the Main Study (including both Visit 8 \[Week 12\] and Visit 9 \[Week 14\]) Long-Term Extension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital SignsBaseline to Week 54 (of LTE)Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), HR, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The APS is a single question, 11-point numeric rating scale in which 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents the worst possible abdominal pain. The change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used for the MMRM analysis.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 14 WeeksAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.
LTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsUp to 54 WeeksAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ParametersBaseline to Week 14Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.
LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ParametersBaseline to Week 54 (of LTE)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital SignsBaseline to Week 14Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), heart rate (HR), body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by the stratification factors. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using multiple imputation (MI) under the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Participants who were randomized but did not have at least 1 post-Baseline observation were considered non-responders. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS was a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 WeeksBaseline and Week 12The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline for at least 6 of the 12 weeks during the Treatment Period were analyzed using a CMH test stratified by the stratification factors. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS is a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using MI under the MAR assumption.
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The percent change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using an MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The change from Baseline at Week 12 in number of pain-free days per week was analyzed using a MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline pain free days as a covariate. Pain-free days were defined as days with a pain score of zero (0). Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.
Main Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabOn Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post doseBlood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Cmax of Olorinab. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.
Main Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabOn Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post doseBlood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Tmax of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.
Main Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabPre dose on Day 1, Day 2 and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time frames after the administration of study treatment to investigate Ctrough of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a 2-treatment period study (12-week Main Study Double-Blind Treatment Period and 52-week Double-Blind Long-Term Extension \[LTE\] Treatment Period) to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Olorinab in the treatment of abdominal pain in participants with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), who were not on concomitant treatment for IBS.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 273 participants were enrolled into the 12-week Main Study Period and a total of 105 participants continued into the 52-week LTE Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mg
Participants were randomized to receive Olorinab 10 mg 3 times per day (TID) for 12 Weeks. After completion of the Main Study, participants in this arm could continue to the LTE Period and were re-randomized to receive either 25 mg or 50 mg Olorinab.
67
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mg
Participants were randomized to receive Olorinab 25 mg TID for 12 Weeks. After completion of the Main Study, participants in this arm could continue to receive the same dose in the LTE Period.
67
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mg
Participants were randomized to receive Olorinab 50 mg TID for 12 Weeks. After completion of the Main Study, participants in this arm could continue to receive the same dose in the LTE Period.
69
Main Study Period: Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo TID for 12 Weeks. After completion of the Main Study, participants in this arm could continue to the LTE Period and were re-randomized to receive either 25 mg or 50 mg Olorinab.
70
Total273

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Double-Blind LTE Treatment PeriodAdverse Event000002
Double-Blind LTE Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up000010
Double-Blind LTE Treatment PeriodStudy termination by Sponsor00004744
Double-Blind LTE Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject000056
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodAdverse Event232300
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodDid not receive treatment010000
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up121000
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision021000
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation010000
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodRegional site closure order due to Covid 19100000
Main Study Double-Blind Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject454900

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMain Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgTotalMain Study Period: PlaceboMain Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study Period: Olorinab 25 mg
Age, Continuous41.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
40.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.92
41.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.38
39.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98
39.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants22 Participants5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
22 Participants65 Participants14 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple races
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
4 Participants9 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
38 Participants173 Participants50 Participants39 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants197 Participants49 Participants50 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants76 Participants21 Participants19 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 660 / 690 / 700 / 530 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 6733 / 6631 / 6935 / 7017 / 5314 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 670 / 660 / 690 / 700 / 530 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

LTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Up to 54 Weeks

Population: LTE Period Safety Set comprises of participants randomly assigned to study treatment and who took at least one dose of study treatment in the LTE Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgLTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsAny TEAEs17 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgLTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsAny SAEs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgLTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsAny TEAEs14 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgLTE Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEsAny SAEs0 Participants
Primary

LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 54 (of LTE)

Population: LTE Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgLTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgLTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters1 Participants
Primary

LTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs

Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), HR, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 54 (of LTE)

Population: LTE Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgLTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgLTE Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12

The APS is a single question, 11-point numeric rating scale in which 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents the worst possible abdominal pain. The change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used for the MMRM analysis.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Main Study Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12-2.32 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.293
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12-2.45 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.297
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12-2.68 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.285
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Change From Baseline in Average Abdominal Pain Score (AAPS) at Week 12-2.14 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.289
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 10 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) has been presented.p-value: =0.6595% CI: [-0.99, 0.62]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 25 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: =0.43995% CI: [-1.12, 0.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 50 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: =0.17295% CI: [-1.34, 0.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters including serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant abnormalities.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 14

Population: Main Study Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs

Parameters assessed for vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), heart rate (HR), body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator was responsible for reviewing vital signs for clinically significant abnormalities.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 14

Population: Main Study Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs0 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Up to 14 Weeks

Population: Main Study Safety Set comprises of participants randomly assigned to study treatment and who took at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAEs34 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAEs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAEs0 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAEs33 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAEs31 Participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAEs0 Participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAEs35 Participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 12

The change from Baseline at Week 12 in number of pain-free days per week was analyzed using a MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline pain free days as a covariate. Pain-free days were defined as days with a pain score of zero (0). Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Main Study Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 120.61 Days per weekStandard Error 0.218
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 120.39 Days per weekStandard Error 0.222
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 120.66 Days per weekStandard Error 0.213
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Change From Baseline in Number of Pain-Free Days at Week 120.54 Days per weekStandard Error 0.216
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 10 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.80495% CI: [-0.53, 0.68]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 25 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.61895% CI: [-0.76, 0.45]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 50 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.68795% CI: [-0.47, 0.71]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Main Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olorinab

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Cmax of Olorinab. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame: On Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post dose

Population: Main Study PK Analysis Set comprises of all participants in the Full Analysis Set with at least one post-dose PK parameter. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabDay 1296.4 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.48
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabWeek 4320.5 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123.4
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabDay 1591.2 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.16
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabWeek 4361.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 350.4
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabDay 1963.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 107.4
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of OlorinabWeek 41097 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 113.4
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 Weeks

The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline for at least 6 of the 12 weeks during the Treatment Period were analyzed using a CMH test stratified by the stratification factors. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS is a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using MI under the MAR assumption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Main Study Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 Weeks53.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 Weeks53.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 Weeks53.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 30% Improvement in AAPS From Baseline for at Least 6 of the 12 Weeks47.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 10 mg and placebo using Odd's ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.52995% CI: [-0.001, 2.468]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 25 mg and placebo using Odd's ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.7395% CI: [0.015, 2.232]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 50 mg and placebo using Odd's ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.54895% CI: [0.025, 2.428]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 12

The percentage of participants achieving a \>= 30% improvement in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by the stratification factors. Missing post-baseline AAPS data was imputed using multiple imputation (MI) under the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Participants who were randomized but did not have at least 1 post-Baseline observation were considered non-responders. A \>= 30% improvement in AAPS was a reduction in AAPS of 30% or more when compared to Baseline AAPS.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Main Study Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 1256.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 1259.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 1256.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30% Improvement in AAPS at Week 1252.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 10 mg and placebo using Odds ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.65995% CI: [-0.019, 2.331]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 25 mg and placebo using Odds ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.55795% CI: [-0.04, 2.535]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 50 mg and placebo using Odds ratio and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.54195% CI: [0.027, 2.462]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12

The percent change in AAPS from Baseline at Week 12 was analyzed using an MMRM analysis with treatment, stratification factors, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as factors and Baseline AAPS as a covariate. Baseline is the last non-missing measurement collected prior to the first dose of study treatment at Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Main Study Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12-36.91 Percent changeStandard Error 4.459
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12-37.73 Percent changeStandard Error 4.521
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12-38.44 Percent changeStandard Error 4.327
Main Study Period: PlaceboMain Study: Percent Change From Baseline in AAPS at Week 12-34.48 Percent changeStandard Error 4.388
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 10 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.69695% CI: [-14.61, 9.76]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 25 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.60295% CI: [-15.51, 9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Treatment comparison between Olorinab 50 mg and placebo using least square mean difference and 95% CI has been presented.p-value: 0.51695% CI: [-15.95, 8.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Main Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of Olorinab

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time frames after the administration of study treatment to investigate Ctrough of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame: Pre dose on Day 1, Day 2 and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12

Population: Main Study PK Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 239.41 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 255.6
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 132.46 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 166.4
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 274.70 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 85.04
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 448.23 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 323.8
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 850.45 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 146.9
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 1032.69 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 296.8
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 1250.39 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 136.8
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 2244.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 81.41
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 2109.8 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 317.2
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 477.71 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 205.8
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 8111.4 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 243.2
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 1284.09 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 471.9
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 188.07 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 183.2
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 1045.96 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 470.8
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 2266.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 174.7
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 8200.3 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 180.4
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 2125.2 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 233.3
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 10137.3 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1193
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabDay 1150.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 130.1
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 4140.6 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 320
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of OlorinabWeek 12102.0 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 288.4
Secondary

Main Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of Olorinab

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated timepoints after the administration of study treatment to investigate Tmax of Olorinab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame: On Day 1: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post dose and Week 4: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1 and 2 hours post dose

Population: Main Study PK Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at the specified timepoints were analyzed. Sampling times reflected timeframe based on actual time and not planned nominal time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabDay 11.00 Hours
Main Study Period: Olorinab 10 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabWeek 41.00 Hours
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabDay 12.02 Hours
Main Study Period: Olorinab 25 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabWeek 41.00 Hours
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabDay 11.02 Hours
Main Study Period: Olorinab 50 mgMain Study: Time of Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) of OlorinabWeek 41.00 Hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026