Skip to content

Auditory Steady State Response vsAuditory Brainstem Response

[ASSR] in Hearing Impaired Children With Absent [ABR] Waves

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04040517
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-31
Start date
2019-12-01
Completion date
2021-01-01
Last updated
2019-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Impaired Children

Keywords

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

All children with hearing loss should have access to resources necessary to reach their maximum potential. The following principles provide the foundation for effective EHDI\[Early Hearing Detection & Intervention\] systems and have been updated and expanded since the 2000 JCIH \[ joint Committee on Infant Hearing \] position statement .

Detailed description

1. All infants should have access to hearing screening using a physiologic measure at no later than 1 month of age. 2. All infants who do not pass the initial hearing screening and the subsequent rescreening should have appropriate audiological and medical evaluations to confirm the presence of hearing loss at no later than 3 months of age. 3. All infants with confirmed permanent hearing loss should receive early intervention services as soon as possible after diagnosis but at no later than 6 months of age. A simplified, single point of entry into an intervention system that is appropriate for children with hearing loss is optimal. The importance of early identification and habilitation of hearing loss for improved access to auditory stimuli and for positive prognosis of speech and language is well established in the literature . Auditory brain stem response (ABR) is the most commonlly used test in clinical practice to estimate the degree of hearing loss, but the auditory brainstem response (ABR) cannot differentiate between severe and profound SNHL \[5\], whereas the ASSR can provide threshold information in a frequency-specific manner at intensity levels of 120 dB and higher. This intensity stimulation advantage uniquely qualifies the ASSR for investigation of residual hearing in young and difficult-to-test cochlear implant candidates.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEvoked potential audiometer

The ASSR \[ steady state response\] test stimuli are modulated pure tones with insert earphone..

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 4 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Absent ABR \[Auditory Breanstem Response\] waves . * normal middle ear function

Exclusion criteria

* Ears with otitis media with effusion, * Preserved otoacuastic emission , * Preserved ABR waves .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A 40 hearing impaired children with absent ABR wavesone yearevaluation by auditory steady state response (ASSR)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
After ASSR evaluation for this patient we can take decision either for hearing aid amplification of for (surgery) cochlear implant .one yearevaluation by auditory steady state response (ASSR)

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Salama Bakr, MD
mohamedsalamabakr@yahoo.com01006550289
Backup ContactMohammad Mohammad El-Moursy, MD
moursy¬_audio2020@yahoo.com01003615648

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026