Skip to content

Improving Skin Cancer Management With Artificial Intelligence (04.17 SMARTI)

A Pilot Study of an Artificial Intelligence System as a Diagnostic Aid to Improve Skin Cancer Management (04.17 SMARTI)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04040114
Acronym
SMARTI
Enrollment
200
Registered
2019-07-31
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma (Skin), Skin Cancer

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Surveillance, Melanoma, Skin Cancer, photography

Brief summary

The study is designed to be able to prove if the Molemap Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm can be used as a diagnostic aid in a clinical setting. This study will determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of the Molemap AI algorithm is comparable to a specialist dermatologist, teledermatologist and registrar (as a surrogate for a general practitioner). The study patient population will be adult patients who require skin cancer assessment. The use of AI as a diagnostic aid may assist primary care physicians who have variable skill in skin cancer diagnosis and lead to more appropriate referrals (rapid referral for lesions requiring treatment and fewer referrals for benign lesions), thereby improving access and reducing waiting times for specialist care.

Detailed description

This is a pilot study which aims to establish whether artificial intelligence can be used as a diagnostic aid to improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes in the specialist setting prior to conducting a much larger trial of the intervention in primary care. Objectives: 1. To establish whether the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence system is on par with teledermatologists' clinical assessment. 2. To establish the safety and feasibility of offering artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid prior to conducting a large trial of the intervention in primary care. Hypotheses: 1. The AI algorithm will have diagnostic accuracy comparable with a teledermatologists' assessment. 2. The AI algorithm will have a diagnostic accuracy more conservative (i.e. more false positives) than dermatologists in the clinical setting. 3. The AI algorithm will have greater diagnostic accuracy than the registrar. 4. The AI algorithm will lead to a reduction in the number of biopsies performed by the registrar the likely impact of which will be reduced cost to patients and the healthcare system. Trial Design: The pilot study will take place in specialist dermatology and melanoma clinics in Victoria, Australia. Potential participants will be identified and screened at the general dermatology and melanoma clinics by the clinic doctors who deem the participant meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intervention: Photography of lesions using a MoleMap camera device with automated artificial intelligence providing an assessment of the lesion in real time. This pilot study will be a before and after intervention trial design. For the initial 'lead-in' phase, no AI diagnosis will be provided back to the treating clinicians. This phase will be used for prospective data collection. For the intervention phase, an AI diagnosis will be provided to the dermatology registrar (who is used in this pilot study as a surrogate for the GP) and dermatologist after they have both assessed the patient clinically. Management of the lesion will be determined by the dermatologist and recorded. The safety of the device will be determined by its use in the setting of specialist dermatology clinics to ensure that patients are receiving the highest standard of care with a dermatologist providing a clinical diagnosis and management for all lesions tested. It is anticipated that the full trial will expand to include multiple sites across Australia and New Zealand.

Interventions

DEVICEMolemap Skin Cancer Triage Artificial Intelligence Device

This device/software incorporates artificial intelligence to provide a diagnostic aide for clinicians of patients with potentially malignant skin lesions. The software is supported by the use of cameras for acquisition of images.

Sponsors

Monash University
CollaboratorOTHER
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Teledermatologist will be blinded to the Artificial Intelligence algorithm diagnosis.

Intervention model description

Controlled before-and-after intervention study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients attending the specialist dermatology clinics for skin cancer assessment or surveillance. 2. Patients may or may not have a lesion of concern. 3. Patients must have at least two lesions imaged during full skin examination by a dermatologist. 4. Age greater than 18 years. 5. Participant is willing and able to undertake investigation of suspicious lesion (e.g. skin biopsy).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient does not give informed consent. 2. Patient is unable or unwilling to have a full skin examination 3. Patient has a known past or current diagnosis of cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of the device when compared prospectively to a teledermatologist assesment12 monthsSensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to the teledermatologist.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of the device when used prospectively as compared to a dermatologist assessment12 monthsSensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to the dermatologist.
Diagnostic accuracy of the device compared to teledermatologist, dermatologist and registrar using histopathology as 'gold standard' for any lesions biopsied.12 monthsSensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to histopathology of any lesions biopsied.
Appropriate selection of lesions by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists12 monthsThis will be assessed by comparing the lesions selected for review by the registrar with the lesions selected by the dermatologist.
Appropriateness of management by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists and impact AI might have on this.12 monthsThis will be assessed by comparing the registrars clinical assessment with the dermatologists clinical assessment and if providing the AI assessment in real time has an impact.

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026