Skip to content

ERAS in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Who Underwent Laparoscopic Repair

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Who Underwent Laparoscopic Repair, a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04039646
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-31
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hospital Cost, Hospital Stay

Keywords

Perforated peptic ulcer, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Laparoscopic repair, Complications

Brief summary

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a frequent emergency condition worldwide with associated mortality up to 30%. Open procedures have in the most part been replaced by laparoscopic techniques. The standard postoperative management of PPUD patients is predominantly based on traditional practices. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate the feasibility of enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in patients who underwent laparoscopic repair for Perforated peptic ulcer.

Detailed description

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a frequent emergency condition worldwide with associated mortality up to 30%. Open procedures have in the most part been replaced by laparoscopic techniques. The standard postoperative management of PPUD patients is predominantly based on traditional practices. Randomization will be made at the end of the surgical procedure. Patients will be included in groups 1 or2. Group 1 is the control group and will receive standard postoperative care, and group 2 is the ERAS group.The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate the feasibility of ERAS in patients who underwent laparoscopic repair for Perforated peptic ulcer.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTERAS treatment

The ERAS group had an enhanced postoperative recovery protocol. The gastric content was aspirated via the nasogastric tube by the anesthesiologist at the end of the procedure, and the nasogastric tube was withdrawn in the operating room immediately after the patient had recovered from anesthesia. and also early feeding and move.

Sponsors

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Perforated ulcer less than 10 mm in size 2. Patients received laprascopic repair

Exclusion criteria

\- 1\. refusal to join the study or sign the informed consent form 3. age younger than 18 years 3.the presence of any psychiatric or neurologic disease 4. class 3 and 4 surgical patients according to the classification of The American Society of Anesthesiologists 5. septic shock on admission 6. pregnancy 7. multiple perforated peptic ulcers 8. spontaneously sealed-off perforated ulcers that were diagnosed either preoperatively or during surgery and that did not require surgical repair 9.conversion to open technique 10. perforated ulcers that were not amenable to Graham patch repair because of size or technical considerations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital stay30 daysThe time patients stay in hospital.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJia Gang Han, MD
hjg211@163.com+86013522867841

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026