Skip to content

Efficacy of EMF BCI Based Device on Acute Stroke

The Efficacy of ElectroMagnetic Field Brain Computer Interface Based Device in the Management of Acute Stroke Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04039178
Enrollment
28
Registered
2019-07-31
Start date
2018-09-04
Completion date
2020-03-21
Last updated
2021-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Stroke

Keywords

BCI, BQ, motor function, acute stroke, EMF

Brief summary

The study tests the efficacy of a non-invasive device with low intensity electromagnetic field dedicated treatment to enhance the recovery of stroke patients impaired hand motor function

Detailed description

The study investigates the effect of BCI based stimulation device on upper limb motor function of acute stroke patients. The BQ device (BrainQ Technologies Ltd., Israel), a Brain Computer Interface based stimulation device, uses machine learning tools to identify high resolution spectral patterns associated with motor functions in EEG measurements of healthy/non healthy subjects. These patterns are then translated into a tailored frequency dependent low intensity, non-invasive electro-magnetic treatment protocol.

Interventions

DEVICEBQ

The BQ device (BrainQ Technologies Ltd., Israel), a Brain Computer Interface based stimulation device, uses machine learning tools to identify high resolution spectral patterns associated with motor functions in EEG measurements of healthy/non healthy subjects. These patterns are then translated into a tailored frequency dependent low intensity, non-invasive electro-magnetic treatment protocol.

DEVICESham

Sham BQ device

Sponsors

BrainQ Technologies Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sham device appears as real device. Only randomizer which is a third party, is unblinded. First 4 patients are non randomized

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, double blinded, sham device controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of 1st ever ischemic stroke confirmed by imaging or 1st recurrent ischemic stroke with no previous neurological impairment in the same limb before current stroke happened 2. 72h to 15 days from stroke onset or 21 days from stroke onset in case the patient was still unstable at day 15 from stroke onset). 3. Medically stable patients 4. Age: \> 18, \<80 years, and independent in their daily activities before the stroke 5. Right dominant hand 6. FM \>10, \<45 of upper tested limb. 7. Able to sit in a chair for 70 consecutive minutes and follow three verbal instructions: * Bring your healthy arm to the level of your shoulder * Pick up this pen with your healthy hand. * Put your healthy hand on your waist 8. Able to understand the information provided and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication for performing MRI scanning 2. History of recent epileptic seizures or epilepsy and/or currently taking medication that are known to lower the seizure threshold 3. Patients with an acute problem such as active infection at the time of recruitment for research 4. Previous disease of the central nervous system 5. Damage to the joints, bones and muscles causing restriction of movement of the upper limb being tested 6. Patients known to suffer from some peripheral nerve damage of the upper limb that being tested 7. Pregnant women and women who have the ability to become pregnant unless they are on an acceptable method of contraception during the study. 8. Alcoholism or drug addiction as defined by DSM-IV within last 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)Two monthsFMA score of upper limb, range between 0 to 66 (higher the better)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BBTtwo monthsBox and Blocks test
TMTtwo monthsTrail making test
NIHSStwo monthsThe national institutes of health stroke scale, a 0 to 42 scale, the higher the worse.
Promis 10two monthsThe PROMIS Global Health short form, 10 questions questionnaire, calculated through a look up t-score table
ARATtwo monthsAction Research Arm test
mRstwo monthsmodified Rankin scale, a 0 to 6 scale, the higher the worse
MRI-DTItwo monthsmagnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging
brain recovery biomarkerstwo monthsUCH-L1, and GFAP
MoCAtwo monthsMontreal cognitive assessment

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026