Conjunctivitis, Allergic, Keratoconjunctivitis, Atopic, Keratoconjunctivitis, Vernal
Conditions
Brief summary
Topical rVA576 for treatment of atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC),and severe allergic conjunctivitis (seasonal (SAC) or perennial (PAC)): a randomised placebo-controlled double masked parallel trial (TRACKER)
Detailed description
Recombinant rVA576 is a small protein (16.7kDa) which has two independent actions. It inhibits the activation and cleavage of complement C5 and it binds and inactivates leukotriene B4 (LTB4). It acts on the complement system by preventing the cleavage of C5 by C5 convertase into C5a and C5b and so is effective in inhibiting terminal complement activity irrespective of the activating pathway. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a type of allergic conjunctivitis which involves mast cell activation due to the predominance of inflammatory mediators such as eosinophils and Th2-generated cytokines (Mishra et al. 2011). Recombinant rVA576 eye drops solution is the investigational medicinal product. It is intended for ophthalmic use by topical administration to the eye. Recombinant rVA576 is a compact small protein molecule with a lipocalin-like structure consisting of alpha helices and a beta barrel. There is a surface-active site which binds to the complement C5 molecule with a high affinity (KD 1.85 x 10-8 M) and an internalised active site which binds the small eicosinoid molecule leukotriene B4 (Hepburn et al. 2007).
Interventions
Part 1: The first 3 patients selected for the study will be treated with the active drug in open-label.
Part 2: Sixteen patients will be randomised 1:1. between active and placebo and patients allocated to either group will receive the appropriate product throughout the trial.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel group comparison with open-label sentinel group.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Aged 18 and above 2. Diagnosis of moderate to severe AKC, VKC, or severe allergic conjunctivitis (seasonal or perennial). Defined as: * AKC, VKC - a composite symptom/sign score from one eye of ≥ 18 out of 33 * Severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC) - a composite symptom/sign score from one eye of ≥ 15 out of 27 3. Will have had received some topical therapy during the last 3 months without improvement but will not currently be receiving systemic immunotherapy. Topical therapy may be topical calcineurin inhibitors, antihistamines or corticosteroids alone or in combination. Lubricants or artificial tears will not a count as topical therapy for these purposes. 4. Will have had at least 7 days without topical ocular corticosteroids prior to entry 5. Willing to give informed consent 6. Willing to use highly effective contraceptive precautions for the duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose of IMP 7. Willing to avoid prohibited medications for duration of study (see list of prohibited medications)
Exclusion criteria
1. Eye surface disease other than AKC, VKC or severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC) 2. Contact lens use during the study 3. Complete or partial tarsorrhaphy. If such a procedure becomes necessary during the course of the trial patients may remain in the trial providing that at least 50% of the eye surface remains visible to slit lamp examination 4. Ankyloblepharon of any degree at entry to the trial 5. Known or suspected ocular malignancy 6. Active ocular infection at entry to the trial. Patients with eye surface bacterial, viral, fungal or protozoal infection may enter the trial after elimination of the infection as confirmed by eye swabs 7. Known or suspected uveitis 8. Participation in any other clinical trial within 1 month of enrolment 9. Use of any of the following prohibited medications: * Eculizumab * Any other investigational complement inhibitor whether systemic or topical (e.g. RA101495) * Montelukast * Zafirlukast * Pranlukast * Zileuton * Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) 10. Corneal perforation 11. Uncontrolled glaucoma (increase in dose of glaucoma medication or surgical intervention for glaucoma within 3 months prior to entry) 12. Pregnancy (females) 13. Breast feeding (females) 14. Known allergy to ticks or severe reaction to arthropod venom (e.g. bee or wasp venom) 15. Use of topical ocular steroids within 7 days of the Screening visit 16. Failure to satisfy the PI of suitability to participate for any other reason
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Ocular TEAE | 56 days | Incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) during the treatment period which have occurred during the 56 days following randomisation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 56 | Graded on patient diary cards at the intervals Day 1-14, 15-28, 29-42 and 43-56. Eye comfort scoring: 0 - Perfectly comfortable 1. \- Slight discomfort. Some burning, itching or stinging for up to half a minute after using the eye drop, solution but the discomfort improves without treatment. 2. \- Moderate discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging lasts for 0.5 minute or longer but improves without treatment. 3. \- Severe discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging last for at least 0.5 minute and requires washing the eyes to relieve it. 4. \- Unbearable burning itching or stinging. So severe that you cannot continue treatment. The 14 day average score for each interval have been calculated for each patient (possible range of 0 to 40). Classifications were assigned using the average total score at each two week period as follows: \< 10 = Comfortable/Acceptable, 10 - 19 = Moderately Uncomfortable, 20 - 29 = Very Uncomfortable, \>= 30 = Severely/Unacceptably Uncomfortable. |
| Visual Acuity | Day 1 to 56 | Visual acuity for the worst eye over time by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts comparison from Day 1 to Day 56 In ETDRS charts, zero indicates standard vision, positive values indicates poor vision, and negative values indicates good vision. |
| Clinical Scores | Day 1 to 56 | Change from Day 1 in composite clinical scores at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56, for the eye judged as worst affected at each visit. Score calculated from symptom and sign sub-components. AKC/VKC: symptom sub-component consisted of itch, tearing, discomfort, discharge, and photophobia, and the sign component consisted of bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy, punctate keratitis, neovascularization of cornea, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, blepharitis. SAC/PAC: symptom sub-component consisted itch, tearing, discomfort, and photophobia, and the sign sub-component consisted of upper tarsal conjunctival hyperaemia, upper bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, blepharitis. For each sign/symptom a score of 0 - 3 is awarded (0=absence of a sign/symptom; an increase in score indicates increase in severity). These scores are summed at the end of the exam to give the composite score. Range:0 to 33 (AKC/VKC) or 27 (SAC/PAC). |
| MMP-9 Positive | Day 1 to 56 | Percentage of patients with Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) positive levels at Days 1, 28, and 56. MMP-9 is a is a nonspecific inflammatory marker. Detection was made using the Inflammadry® device. This device gives a binary (positive/negative) result. |
| Tear Film Break up Time | Change from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56 | Change from Day 1 in Tear film break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56. TBUT data was available for one eye only. Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. To measure TBUT, fluorescein is instilled into the patient's tear film and the patient is asked not to blink while the tear film is observed under a broad beam of cobalt blue illumination. The TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal. |
Countries
Spain, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Patients in Part 1 did not continue into Part 2.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period Part 1: The first three patients selected were treated with active drug in an open-label manner. They had weekly clinic visits for up the first two weeks and thereafter biweekly visits. When the third of the first three patients had completed their first two weeks of treatment, the PI reviewed the safety, tolerability, and ease of application for each patient before deciding to proceed to the randomised, double masked comparative phase of the study (Part 2). The three patients were to continue on the study and complete eight weeks of treatment as open-label patients. | 3 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period Part 2: A randomised, double-masked, placebo controlled trial of topical rVA576, or placebo eye drops in moderate to severe AKC, VKC and severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC). | 3 |
| Placebo Part 2: A randomised, double-masked, placebo controlled trial of topical rVA576, or placebo eye drops in moderate to severe AKC, VKC and severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC). | 6 |
| Total | 12 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-label Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Randomized, Double-blind Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo | rVA576, Double-blind Period | rVA576, Open-label Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 32.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42 | 33.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.04 | 30.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81 | 44.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.55 |
| Indication Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Indication Perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Indication Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Indication Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Patient group AKC/VKC | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Patient group SAC/PAC | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Hispanic or Latino | 12 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 6 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 3 | 2 / 3 | 3 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 6 |
Outcome results
Incidence of Ocular TEAE
Incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) during the treatment period which have occurred during the 56 days following randomisation.
Time frame: 56 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Incidence of Ocular TEAE | 3 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Incidence of Ocular TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Incidence of Ocular TEAE | 3 Participants |
Clinical Scores
Change from Day 1 in composite clinical scores at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56, for the eye judged as worst affected at each visit. Score calculated from symptom and sign sub-components. AKC/VKC: symptom sub-component consisted of itch, tearing, discomfort, discharge, and photophobia, and the sign component consisted of bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy, punctate keratitis, neovascularization of cornea, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, blepharitis. SAC/PAC: symptom sub-component consisted itch, tearing, discomfort, and photophobia, and the sign sub-component consisted of upper tarsal conjunctival hyperaemia, upper bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, blepharitis. For each sign/symptom a score of 0 - 3 is awarded (0=absence of a sign/symptom; an increase in score indicates increase in severity). These scores are summed at the end of the exam to give the composite score. Range:0 to 33 (AKC/VKC) or 27 (SAC/PAC).
Time frame: Day 1 to 56
Population: Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess this score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.~Note there were two patients on Placebo with SAC; therefore, scored on a different scale compared to patients with AKC or VKC. For the purposes of the outcome measure, the SAC and AKC/VKC scores were combined to derive a single value across all participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Clinical Scores | Day 56 | 10.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Clinical Scores | Baseline | 23.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Clinical Scores | Day 28 | 14.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Clinical Scores | Day 42 | 16.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Clinical Scores | Day 14 | 16.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Clinical Scores | Day 28 | 19.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Clinical Scores | Baseline | 20.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Clinical Scores | Day 14 | 15.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Clinical Scores | Day 42 | 16.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Clinical Scores | Day 56 | 15.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| Placebo | Clinical Scores | Day 14 | 14.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Placebo | Clinical Scores | Day 42 | 11.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.32 |
| Placebo | Clinical Scores | Baseline | 21.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| Placebo | Clinical Scores | Day 28 | 15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.48 |
| Placebo | Clinical Scores | Day 56 | 11.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.28 |
| Placebo (SAC/PAC) | Clinical Scores | Day 28 | 17.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.78 |
| Placebo (SAC/PAC) | Clinical Scores | Baseline | 19.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.54 |
| Placebo (SAC/PAC) | Clinical Scores | Day 14 | 17.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.36 |
MMP-9 Positive
Percentage of patients with Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) positive levels at Days 1, 28, and 56. MMP-9 is a is a nonspecific inflammatory marker. Detection was made using the Inflammadry® device. This device gives a binary (positive/negative) result.
Time frame: Day 1 to 56
Population: There were too few patients to make a meaningful interpretation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Positive | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Negative | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Negative | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Positive | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Positive | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Negative | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Negative | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Negative | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Negative | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Positive | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Positive | 3 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Negative | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Positive | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Negative | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Positive | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Negative | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Negative | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 left eye | Negative | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 right eye | Negative | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline left eye | Positive | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 56 left eye | Positive | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Baseline right eye | Positive | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | MMP-9 Positive | Day 28 right eye | Negative | 3 Participants |
Post-instillation Comfort
Graded on patient diary cards at the intervals Day 1-14, 15-28, 29-42 and 43-56. Eye comfort scoring: 0 - Perfectly comfortable 1. \- Slight discomfort. Some burning, itching or stinging for up to half a minute after using the eye drop, solution but the discomfort improves without treatment. 2. \- Moderate discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging lasts for 0.5 minute or longer but improves without treatment. 3. \- Severe discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging last for at least 0.5 minute and requires washing the eyes to relieve it. 4. \- Unbearable burning itching or stinging. So severe that you cannot continue treatment. The 14 day average score for each interval have been calculated for each patient (possible range of 0 to 40). Classifications were assigned using the average total score at each two week period as follows: \< 10 = Comfortable/Acceptable, 10 - 19 = Moderately Uncomfortable, 20 - 29 = Very Uncomfortable, \>= 30 = Severely/Unacceptably Uncomfortable.
Time frame: Day 1 to 56
Population: The Comfort score data was not available for one patient in the nomacopan group Part 2, and in one patient in Part 1, after Day 14, both due to withdrawal.~Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess comfort score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 3 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 1 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 2 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Day 1 to 14 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 15 to 28 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 29 to 42 | Moderately Uncomfortable | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Post-instillation Comfort | Days 43 to 56 | Comfortable/Acceptable | 5 Participants |
Tear Film Break up Time
Change from Day 1 in Tear film break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56. TBUT data was available for one eye only. Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. To measure TBUT, fluorescein is instilled into the patient's tear film and the patient is asked not to blink while the tear film is observed under a broad beam of cobalt blue illumination. The TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal.
Time frame: Change from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56
Population: Patient numbers within each treatment group are too small to make meaningful comparisons, and so no further analysis was performed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 42 | 8.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 28 | 11.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Baseline | 5.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 5.57 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 14 | 6.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 3.61 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 56 | 6.5 seconds | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 28 | 4.5 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Baseline | 3.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 1 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 14 | 2.5 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 42 | 4.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 56 | 5.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 56 | 7.4 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.95 |
| Placebo | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 42 | 8.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 2.16 |
| Placebo | Tear Film Break up Time | Baseline | 3.5 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Placebo | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 28 | 5.0 seconds | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Placebo | Tear Film Break up Time | Day 14 | 3.7 seconds | Standard Deviation 2.25 |
Visual Acuity
Visual acuity for the worst eye over time by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts comparison from Day 1 to Day 56 In ETDRS charts, zero indicates standard vision, positive values indicates poor vision, and negative values indicates good vision.
Time frame: Day 1 to 56
Population: Only one patient in the nomacopan group in Part 2 had data to assess this score. It is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Visual Acuity | Day 14 | 59.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 48.5 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Visual Acuity | Day 42 | 85.5 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Visual Acuity | Baseline | 56.7 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 49.1 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Visual Acuity | Day 28 | 84.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Open-label Period | Visual Acuity | Day 56 (end of dosing) | 87.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Visual Acuity | Day 28 | 78.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Visual Acuity | Day 42 | 83.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Visual Acuity | Day 56 (end of dosing) | 81.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Visual Acuity | Day 14 | 82.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 0 |
| rVA576, Double-blind Period | Visual Acuity | Baseline | 66.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Placebo | Visual Acuity | Day 56 (end of dosing) | 77.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 10.56 |
| Placebo | Visual Acuity | Baseline | 82.7 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 8.778 |
| Placebo | Visual Acuity | Day 14 | 82.0 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 7.18 |
| Placebo | Visual Acuity | Day 28 | 79.8 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 10.68 |
| Placebo | Visual Acuity | Day 42 | 79.3 Number of ETDRS letters | Standard Deviation 15.33 |