Skip to content

Topical rVA576 for Treatment of Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis

Topical rVA576 for Treatment of Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis: a Randomised Placebo-controlled Double Masked Parallel Trial (TRACKER)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04037891
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-07-30
Start date
2019-03-04
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2025-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conjunctivitis, Allergic, Keratoconjunctivitis, Atopic, Keratoconjunctivitis, Vernal

Brief summary

Topical rVA576 for treatment of atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC),and severe allergic conjunctivitis (seasonal (SAC) or perennial (PAC)): a randomised placebo-controlled double masked parallel trial (TRACKER)

Detailed description

Recombinant rVA576 is a small protein (16.7kDa) which has two independent actions. It inhibits the activation and cleavage of complement C5 and it binds and inactivates leukotriene B4 (LTB4). It acts on the complement system by preventing the cleavage of C5 by C5 convertase into C5a and C5b and so is effective in inhibiting terminal complement activity irrespective of the activating pathway. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a type of allergic conjunctivitis which involves mast cell activation due to the predominance of inflammatory mediators such as eosinophils and Th2-generated cytokines (Mishra et al. 2011). Recombinant rVA576 eye drops solution is the investigational medicinal product. It is intended for ophthalmic use by topical administration to the eye. Recombinant rVA576 is a compact small protein molecule with a lipocalin-like structure consisting of alpha helices and a beta barrel. There is a surface-active site which binds to the complement C5 molecule with a high affinity (KD 1.85 x 10-8 M) and an internalised active site which binds the small eicosinoid molecule leukotriene B4 (Hepburn et al. 2007).

Interventions

DRUGrVA576

Part 1: The first 3 patients selected for the study will be treated with the active drug in open-label.

OTHERPlacebo

Part 2: Sixteen patients will be randomised 1:1. between active and placebo and patients allocated to either group will receive the appropriate product throughout the trial.

Sponsors

AKARI Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel group comparison with open-label sentinel group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 and above 2. Diagnosis of moderate to severe AKC, VKC, or severe allergic conjunctivitis (seasonal or perennial). Defined as: * AKC, VKC - a composite symptom/sign score from one eye of ≥ 18 out of 33 * Severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC) - a composite symptom/sign score from one eye of ≥ 15 out of 27 3. Will have had received some topical therapy during the last 3 months without improvement but will not currently be receiving systemic immunotherapy. Topical therapy may be topical calcineurin inhibitors, antihistamines or corticosteroids alone or in combination. Lubricants or artificial tears will not a count as topical therapy for these purposes. 4. Will have had at least 7 days without topical ocular corticosteroids prior to entry 5. Willing to give informed consent 6. Willing to use highly effective contraceptive precautions for the duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose of IMP 7. Willing to avoid prohibited medications for duration of study (see list of prohibited medications)

Exclusion criteria

1. Eye surface disease other than AKC, VKC or severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC) 2. Contact lens use during the study 3. Complete or partial tarsorrhaphy. If such a procedure becomes necessary during the course of the trial patients may remain in the trial providing that at least 50% of the eye surface remains visible to slit lamp examination 4. Ankyloblepharon of any degree at entry to the trial 5. Known or suspected ocular malignancy 6. Active ocular infection at entry to the trial. Patients with eye surface bacterial, viral, fungal or protozoal infection may enter the trial after elimination of the infection as confirmed by eye swabs 7. Known or suspected uveitis 8. Participation in any other clinical trial within 1 month of enrolment 9. Use of any of the following prohibited medications: * Eculizumab * Any other investigational complement inhibitor whether systemic or topical (e.g. RA101495) * Montelukast * Zafirlukast * Pranlukast * Zileuton * Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) 10. Corneal perforation 11. Uncontrolled glaucoma (increase in dose of glaucoma medication or surgical intervention for glaucoma within 3 months prior to entry) 12. Pregnancy (females) 13. Breast feeding (females) 14. Known allergy to ticks or severe reaction to arthropod venom (e.g. bee or wasp venom) 15. Use of topical ocular steroids within 7 days of the Screening visit 16. Failure to satisfy the PI of suitability to participate for any other reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Ocular TEAE56 daysIncidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) during the treatment period which have occurred during the 56 days following randomisation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 56Graded on patient diary cards at the intervals Day 1-14, 15-28, 29-42 and 43-56. Eye comfort scoring: 0 - Perfectly comfortable 1. \- Slight discomfort. Some burning, itching or stinging for up to half a minute after using the eye drop, solution but the discomfort improves without treatment. 2. \- Moderate discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging lasts for 0.5 minute or longer but improves without treatment. 3. \- Severe discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging last for at least 0.5 minute and requires washing the eyes to relieve it. 4. \- Unbearable burning itching or stinging. So severe that you cannot continue treatment. The 14 day average score for each interval have been calculated for each patient (possible range of 0 to 40). Classifications were assigned using the average total score at each two week period as follows: \< 10 = Comfortable/Acceptable, 10 - 19 = Moderately Uncomfortable, 20 - 29 = Very Uncomfortable, \>= 30 = Severely/Unacceptably Uncomfortable.
Visual AcuityDay 1 to 56Visual acuity for the worst eye over time by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts comparison from Day 1 to Day 56 In ETDRS charts, zero indicates standard vision, positive values indicates poor vision, and negative values indicates good vision.
Clinical ScoresDay 1 to 56Change from Day 1 in composite clinical scores at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56, for the eye judged as worst affected at each visit. Score calculated from symptom and sign sub-components. AKC/VKC: symptom sub-component consisted of itch, tearing, discomfort, discharge, and photophobia, and the sign component consisted of bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy, punctate keratitis, neovascularization of cornea, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, blepharitis. SAC/PAC: symptom sub-component consisted itch, tearing, discomfort, and photophobia, and the sign sub-component consisted of upper tarsal conjunctival hyperaemia, upper bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, blepharitis. For each sign/symptom a score of 0 - 3 is awarded (0=absence of a sign/symptom; an increase in score indicates increase in severity). These scores are summed at the end of the exam to give the composite score. Range:0 to 33 (AKC/VKC) or 27 (SAC/PAC).
MMP-9 PositiveDay 1 to 56Percentage of patients with Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) positive levels at Days 1, 28, and 56. MMP-9 is a is a nonspecific inflammatory marker. Detection was made using the Inflammadry® device. This device gives a binary (positive/negative) result.
Tear Film Break up TimeChange from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56Change from Day 1 in Tear film break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56. TBUT data was available for one eye only. Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. To measure TBUT, fluorescein is instilled into the patient's tear film and the patient is asked not to blink while the tear film is observed under a broad beam of cobalt blue illumination. The TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal.

Countries

Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients in Part 1 did not continue into Part 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
rVA576, Open-label Period
Part 1: The first three patients selected were treated with active drug in an open-label manner. They had weekly clinic visits for up the first two weeks and thereafter biweekly visits. When the third of the first three patients had completed their first two weeks of treatment, the PI reviewed the safety, tolerability, and ease of application for each patient before deciding to proceed to the randomised, double masked comparative phase of the study (Part 2). The three patients were to continue on the study and complete eight weeks of treatment as open-label patients.
3
rVA576, Double-blind Period
Part 2: A randomised, double-masked, placebo controlled trial of topical rVA576, or placebo eye drops in moderate to severe AKC, VKC and severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC).
3
Placebo
Part 2: A randomised, double-masked, placebo controlled trial of topical rVA576, or placebo eye drops in moderate to severe AKC, VKC and severe allergic conjunctivitis (SAC or PAC).
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Open-label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject100
Randomized, Double-blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceborVA576, Double-blind PeriodrVA576, Open-label Period
Age, Continuous32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42
33.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.04
30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.55
Indication
Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC)
8 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Indication
Perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Indication
Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC)
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Indication
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Patient group
AKC/VKC
10 Participants4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Patient group
SAC/PAC
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
7 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 30 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 32 / 33 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 30 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Ocular TEAE

Incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) during the treatment period which have occurred during the 56 days following randomisation.

Time frame: 56 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
rVA576, Open-label PeriodIncidence of Ocular TEAE3 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodIncidence of Ocular TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Ocular TEAE3 Participants
95% CI: [-53.57, 72.99]
Comparison: Comparison of incidence of ocular TEAE in all patients receiving rVA576 (part 1 and 2) vs placebo95% CI: [-25.45, 78.39]
Secondary

Clinical Scores

Change from Day 1 in composite clinical scores at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56, for the eye judged as worst affected at each visit. Score calculated from symptom and sign sub-components. AKC/VKC: symptom sub-component consisted of itch, tearing, discomfort, discharge, and photophobia, and the sign component consisted of bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy, punctate keratitis, neovascularization of cornea, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, blepharitis. SAC/PAC: symptom sub-component consisted itch, tearing, discomfort, and photophobia, and the sign sub-component consisted of upper tarsal conjunctival hyperaemia, upper bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, blepharitis. For each sign/symptom a score of 0 - 3 is awarded (0=absence of a sign/symptom; an increase in score indicates increase in severity). These scores are summed at the end of the exam to give the composite score. Range:0 to 33 (AKC/VKC) or 27 (SAC/PAC).

Time frame: Day 1 to 56

Population: Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess this score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.~Note there were two patients on Placebo with SAC; therefore, scored on a different scale compared to patients with AKC or VKC. For the purposes of the outcome measure, the SAC and AKC/VKC scores were combined to derive a single value across all participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
rVA576, Open-label PeriodClinical ScoresDay 5610.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
rVA576, Open-label PeriodClinical ScoresBaseline23.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
rVA576, Open-label PeriodClinical ScoresDay 2814.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
rVA576, Open-label PeriodClinical ScoresDay 4216.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
rVA576, Open-label PeriodClinical ScoresDay 1416.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodClinical ScoresDay 2819.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodClinical ScoresBaseline20.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodClinical ScoresDay 1415.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodClinical ScoresDay 4216.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodClinical ScoresDay 5615.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboClinical ScoresDay 1414.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
PlaceboClinical ScoresDay 4211.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
PlaceboClinical ScoresBaseline21.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboClinical ScoresDay 2815 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
PlaceboClinical ScoresDay 5611.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.28
Placebo (SAC/PAC)Clinical ScoresDay 2817.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
Placebo (SAC/PAC)Clinical ScoresBaseline19.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Placebo (SAC/PAC)Clinical ScoresDay 1417.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Secondary

MMP-9 Positive

Percentage of patients with Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) positive levels at Days 1, 28, and 56. MMP-9 is a is a nonspecific inflammatory marker. Detection was made using the Inflammadry® device. This device gives a binary (positive/negative) result.

Time frame: Day 1 to 56

Population: There were too few patients to make a meaningful interpretation.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyePositive0 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyeNegative1 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyeNegative1 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyeNegative2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyeNegative0 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyePositive1 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyeNegative1 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyePositive1 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyeNegative1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyeNegative0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyeNegative0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyeNegative0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyeNegative0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyePositive1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyePositive2 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyeNegative1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyePositive3 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyeNegative1 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyePositive1 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyeNegative4 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyePositive3 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyeNegative5 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyeNegative2 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 left eyeNegative3 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 right eyeNegative3 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveBaseline left eyePositive4 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyePositive2 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 56 left eyePositive0 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveBaseline right eyePositive2 Participants
PlaceboMMP-9 PositiveDay 28 right eyeNegative3 Participants
Secondary

Post-instillation Comfort

Graded on patient diary cards at the intervals Day 1-14, 15-28, 29-42 and 43-56. Eye comfort scoring: 0 - Perfectly comfortable 1. \- Slight discomfort. Some burning, itching or stinging for up to half a minute after using the eye drop, solution but the discomfort improves without treatment. 2. \- Moderate discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging lasts for 0.5 minute or longer but improves without treatment. 3. \- Severe discomfort. Burning, itching or stinging last for at least 0.5 minute and requires washing the eyes to relieve it. 4. \- Unbearable burning itching or stinging. So severe that you cannot continue treatment. The 14 day average score for each interval have been calculated for each patient (possible range of 0 to 40). Classifications were assigned using the average total score at each two week period as follows: \< 10 = Comfortable/Acceptable, 10 - 19 = Moderately Uncomfortable, 20 - 29 = Very Uncomfortable, \>= 30 = Severely/Unacceptably Uncomfortable.

Time frame: Day 1 to 56

Population: The Comfort score data was not available for one patient in the nomacopan group Part 2, and in one patient in Part 1, after Day 14, both due to withdrawal.~Because only two patients in the Part 2 nomacopan group had data to assess comfort score, it is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Moderately Uncomfortable0 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Comfortable/Acceptable3 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Moderately Uncomfortable0 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Comfortable/Acceptable2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Moderately Uncomfortable0 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Comfortable/Acceptable2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Comfortable/Acceptable2 Participants
rVA576, Open-label PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Moderately Uncomfortable0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Moderately Uncomfortable1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Moderately Uncomfortable1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Comfortable/Acceptable1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Comfortable/Acceptable1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Moderately Uncomfortable1 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Comfortable/Acceptable2 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Moderately Uncomfortable0 Participants
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Comfortable/Acceptable1 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Moderately Uncomfortable1 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Comfortable/Acceptable4 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDay 1 to 14Moderately Uncomfortable2 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Comfortable/Acceptable5 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 15 to 28Moderately Uncomfortable1 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Comfortable/Acceptable4 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 29 to 42Moderately Uncomfortable2 Participants
PlaceboPost-instillation ComfortDays 43 to 56Comfortable/Acceptable5 Participants
Secondary

Tear Film Break up Time

Change from Day 1 in Tear film break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56. TBUT data was available for one eye only. Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. To measure TBUT, fluorescein is instilled into the patient's tear film and the patient is asked not to blink while the tear film is observed under a broad beam of cobalt blue illumination. The TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal.

Time frame: Change from Day 1 at Day 14, 28, 42 and 56

Population: Patient numbers within each treatment group are too small to make meaningful comparisons, and so no further analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
rVA576, Open-label PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 428.0 secondsStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Open-label PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 2811.0 secondsStandard Deviation 1.41
rVA576, Open-label PeriodTear Film Break up TimeBaseline5.0 secondsStandard Deviation 5.57
rVA576, Open-label PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 146.0 secondsStandard Deviation 3.61
rVA576, Open-label PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 566.5 secondsStandard Deviation 2.12
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 284.5 secondsStandard Deviation 0.71
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodTear Film Break up TimeBaseline3.0 secondsStandard Deviation 1
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 142.5 secondsStandard Deviation 0.71
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 424.0 secondsStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodTear Film Break up TimeDay 565.0 secondsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTear Film Break up TimeDay 567.4 secondsStandard Deviation 1.95
PlaceboTear Film Break up TimeDay 428.0 secondsStandard Deviation 2.16
PlaceboTear Film Break up TimeBaseline3.5 secondsStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboTear Film Break up TimeDay 285.0 secondsStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboTear Film Break up TimeDay 143.7 secondsStandard Deviation 2.25
Secondary

Visual Acuity

Visual acuity for the worst eye over time by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts comparison from Day 1 to Day 56 In ETDRS charts, zero indicates standard vision, positive values indicates poor vision, and negative values indicates good vision.

Time frame: Day 1 to 56

Population: Only one patient in the nomacopan group in Part 2 had data to assess this score. It is not meaningful to compare the nomacopan and placebo groups, and so further analysis was not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
rVA576, Open-label PeriodVisual AcuityDay 1459.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 48.5
rVA576, Open-label PeriodVisual AcuityDay 4285.5 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0.7
rVA576, Open-label PeriodVisual AcuityBaseline56.7 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 49.1
rVA576, Open-label PeriodVisual AcuityDay 2884.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Open-label PeriodVisual AcuityDay 56 (end of dosing)87.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 1.4
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodVisual AcuityDay 2878.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodVisual AcuityDay 4283.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodVisual AcuityDay 56 (end of dosing)81.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodVisual AcuityDay 1482.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 0
rVA576, Double-blind PeriodVisual AcuityBaseline66.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 19.8
PlaceboVisual AcuityDay 56 (end of dosing)77.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 10.56
PlaceboVisual AcuityBaseline82.7 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 8.778
PlaceboVisual AcuityDay 1482.0 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 7.18
PlaceboVisual AcuityDay 2879.8 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 10.68
PlaceboVisual AcuityDay 4279.3 Number of ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 15.33

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026