Skip to content

qMOLI- A Qualitative Assessment of Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Labour Induction

An Alongside Qualitative Study Exploring Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Expectations and Experiences of Labour Induction With Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Hypertension in Pregnancy in India

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04037683
Acronym
qMOLI
Enrollment
136
Registered
2019-07-30
Start date
2019-10-18
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pre-Eclampsia

Keywords

induction of labour, intrapartum fetal monitoring, qualitative, semi-structured interview, focus groups

Brief summary

Q MOLI is an alongside qualitative study, for the 'Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Labour Induction' (MOLI) pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial, comparing a misoprostol/misoprostol regime vs the standard misoprostol/oxytocin induction of labour regime.1000 patients with hypertensive disease in pregnancy will be recruited, over 24 months, in Nagpur, India.

Detailed description

Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews, with participants (pregnant women with hypertension/pre-eclampsia participating in the 'Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Labour Induction' (MOLI) study who consent to enter the qualitative study) in a randomised trial, pre and post induction of labour and focus group discussions with healthcare professionals involved in the study (MOLI study staff; practitioners who are involved in screening, recruiting, randomising and consenting participants to the MOLI study). The investigators aim to assess the priorities, experiences and acceptability of women being induced for hypertension in pregnancy in India, and clinician's views on the feasibility, usability, acceptability and barriers to implementation of various induction protocols. 1. Explore patients' perceptions, expectations, priorities, understanding of and concerns around induction of labour, prior to induction. 2. To explore the experiences, acceptability and satisfaction of patients post induction and any differences between the two RCT groups; misoprostol/misoprostol vs misoprostol/oxytocin regimes. 3. To better understand the feasibility, usability and acceptability of the different induction regimes to health care professionals. To explore potential barriers for implementing research findings into clinical practice and potential solutions. 4. To explore patients' and staff perspectives of the fetal monitoring regimens during the induction process.

Interventions

Misoprostol 25mcg orally given 2-hourly

DRUGOxytocin

Oxytocin infusion

Sponsors

Government Medical College, Nagpur
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gynuity Health Projects
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

MOLI RCT participants (women being induced) Inclusion criteria * Women who are recruited to the MOLI RCT and are either antenatal, or post-induction and meet all of the eligibility criteria: * Women who consent to join the qualitative study

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are not recruited to the MOLI RCT * Women who lack the capacity to make an informed decision * Women under the age of 16 * Women who have had a stillbirth in this pregnancy * Women who are distressed/in pain * Women too unwell to take part in interviews, or who need urgent intervention (in less than 2 hours) * Where delay in starting the IOL process due to time of interview could cause harm to the patient * Women who do not give consent to be in the study MOLI practitioners Inclusion criteria • Practitioners who are involved in screening, recruiting, randomising and consenting participants to MOLI RCT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' views on induction of labour, prior to induction.6 monthsExplore patients' perceptions of induction of labour, prior to induction.
Patients' views on induction of labour, post induction.6 monthsTo explore the experiences of patients post induction and any differences between the two RCT groups; misoprostol/misoprostol vs misoprostol/oxytocin regimes.
Clinicians' views on various induction protocols.6 monthsTo better understand the acceptability of the different induction regimes to health care professionals. To explore potential barriers for implementing research findings into clinical practice and potential solutions.
Patients' views on the fetal monitoring regimens during the induction process.6 monthsTo explore patients' perspectives of the fetal monitoring regimens during the induction process.
Staff's views on the fetal monitoring regimens during the induction process.6 monthsTo explore staff perspectives of the fetal monitoring regimens during the induction process.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026