Skip to content

Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex and the Antidepressant Efficacy of Theta Burst Stimulation in Depressed Patients

Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex and the Antidepressant Efficacy of Theta Burst Stimulation in Depressed Patients and Its Predictors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04037592
Enrollment
34
Registered
2019-07-30
Start date
2019-07-24
Completion date
2021-01-31
Last updated
2022-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment Resistant Depression

Brief summary

This study evaluates an association between different dosage and the antidepressant efficacy of theta burst stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression. In a double-blind design, All patients are randomized to three groups, i.e. standardized dosage intermittent theta-burst stimulation treatment, high dosage intermittent theta-burst stimulation treatment or sham treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEActive standardized iTBS-DMPFC

Participants in the standardized dosage(600 pulse) of intermittent TBS(iTBS) active stimulation group will receive 3-week three-pulse 50-Hz bursts administered every 200 milliseconds (at 5 Hz) at an intensity of 80% active motor threshold (MT) to bilateral DMPF, twice a day. Bilateral side DMPFC will be targeted by MRI-neuronavigation system. Stimulation will be delivered to the DMPFC using a Magstim stimulator.

DEVICEActive high-dosage iTBS-DMPFC

Participants in the standardized dosage(1800pulse) of intermittent TBS(iTBS) active stimulation group will receive 3-week three-pulse 50-Hz bursts administered every 200 milliseconds (at 5 Hz) at an intensity of 80% active motor threshold (MT) to bilateral DMPF, twice a day. Bilateral side DMPFC will be targeted by MRI-neuronavigation system. Stimulation will be delivered to the DMPFC using a Magstim stimulator.

DEVICESham standardized iTBS-DMPFC or high-dosage iTBS-DMPFC

Half of the patients in the sham group received 3-week the same standardized iTBS parameter stimulation (standardized sham-iTBS), and the other half received the same high dosage iTBS parameter stimulation using a sham coil (high dosage sham-rTMS), which also improved the blinding process

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 21 to 70 years of age. * Diagnosed with the recurrent Major depressive disorder (MDD) and currently having a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) * Participants failed to respond to at least one adequate antidepressant treatment in their current episode * Participants have a Clinical Global Impression - Severity score of at least 4 and a total score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) at both screening and baseline visits ( Day -14 and Day 0) * Participants must discontinue their antidepressant medications at least for one week ( at least two weeks if Fluoxetine) prior to the TMS intervention and keep antidepressant-free during the study duration. * Participants also failed to respond to one complete left-sided DLPFC 10Hz rTMS/piTBS treatment course.

Exclusion criteria

* a lifetime psychiatric history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic disorders, or organic mental disorder including substance abuse and dependence (based on DSM-IV criteria) * Participants with a lifetime medical history of major systemic illness and clinically significantly abnormal screening examination that might affect safety, study participation, or confound interpretation of study results. * Participants with a lifetime medical history of neurological disorder records (e.g., stroke, seizure, traumatic brain injury, post brain surgery), brain implants (neurostimulators), cardiac pacemakers * Women with breastfeeding or pregnancy * Participants with a current strong suicidal risk (i.e., a score of 4 on item 3 of the HDRS-17)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 15(three-month after brain stimulation), Week 27(Six-month after brain stimulation)the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Remission rate after 3-week treatmentBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 15(three-month after brain stimulation), Week 27(Six-month after brain stimulation)17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤7 (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)
Changes in Clinical Global IndexBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3Clinical Global Index
Changes in depression severity, rated by self-reportedBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale, range from 0 to 66 with higher scores indicating more depressive and somatic symptom.
Changes in Young Mania Rating ScaleBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3Young Mania Rating Scale, range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more severe manic symptoms.
Baseline treatment refractory level and the further antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3Maudsley staging method
Baseline brain connectivity and the further antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3baseline functional MRI
the change of brain connectivity after 3-week iTBS treatmentBaseline, Week 3the change in brain connectivity
Response rate after 3-week treatment at the end of iTBS sessions and three and six month after.Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 15(three-month after brain stimulation), Week 27(Six-month after brain stimulation)improvement \> 50 % of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)
Changes in EEG band before and after brain stimulationDay 1(pre-RECT, post RECT, post 1st treatment, pre-30th treatment)Perform rostral anterior cingulate cortex(rACC)-engaging cognitive task(RECT) before 1-st treatment
Baseline single-pulse stimulation and the further antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3baseline single-pulse stimulation
Changes in single-pulse stimulation before and after brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3the change in single-pulse stimulation
Baseline paired-pulse stimulation and the further antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3baseline paired-pulse stimulation
Changes in paired-pulse stimulation before and after brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3the change in paired-pulse stimulation
Change in anxiosomatic cluster symptoms derived 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3the altered anxiosomatic cluster symptoms (range, 0 to 26, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiosomatic symptoms).The anxiosomatic cluster symptoms comprised nine items derived from HDRS-17: early insomnia, middle insomnia, slowness or retardation, psychic anxiety, autonomic anxiety, gastrointestinal symptoms, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, and hypochondriasis.
Baseline Life event stress scale and the further antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 3Life event stress scale,range from 0 to 1467 with higher scores indicating more life event stress.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026