Skip to content

Vitamin C Supplementation Intervention

Vitamin C Supplementation Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure-A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04036110
Enrollment
36
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
2018-08-14
Completion date
2020-06-16
Last updated
2021-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Vitamin C supplementation

Brief summary

This study is to test a low-cost, simple vitamin C supplementation intervention, that is, comparing placebo to 500 mg/day vitamin C and 1 gram/day vitamin C daily to assess feasibility and acceptability of vitamin C supplementation and effects on serum vitamin C level, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptom burden, oxidative stress, and cardiac function.

Detailed description

This study will address feasibility from the perspective of being able to: a) to detect significant differences in the serum vitamin C level after supplementation (3 months) between the intervention groups and the control group, b) to detect significant differences in health related quality of life (HRQOL), symptom burden, oxidative stress, and cardiac function after vitamin C supplementation (3 months) between the intervention groups and the control group.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin C 500 mg

500 mg tablet taken orally with one meal daily

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin C 1000 mg

1000 mg tablet taken orally with one meal daily

OTHERPlacebo

1 tablet taken orally with one meal daily

Sponsors

Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patents recruited will have a diagnosis of chronic HF, either preserved or reduced ejection fraction. The diagnosis and etiology of chronic HF will be confirmed by a HF cardiologist using established criteria. Other criteria: * have undergone evaluation of HF and optimization of medical therapy, * vitamin C supplementation \<500 mg/day * have not been referred for heart transplantation, * able to read and speak English, * \>1 month from any inpatient hospitalization

Exclusion criteria

* history of renal stones or renal disease (serum creatinine \>1.5, * history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) and cognitive impairment that precludes giving informed consent or ability to follow protocol instructions * pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Vitamin C Level at BaselineBaselineThe ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum
Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 3Month 3The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life ScoresBaseline and up to 3 months after enrollmentHealth related quality of life is measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a patient-reported outcome to measure the patient's perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical and emotional aspects of life. The questionnaire has 21 items to assess the impact of frequent physical symptoms of heart failure and the effects of heart failure on physical and emotional functions. The response scale for all 21 items on the MLHFQ is based on a 6-point (from 0 to 5). Scores are summed to a range of 0-105, in which with higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Total MSAS-HF ScoreBaseline and up to 3 months after enrollmentSymptom burden is measured using items from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Heart Failure (MSAS-HF). The MSAS-HF is an 8-item questionnaire to measure HF symptoms experienced by patients with HF. Patients will be first asked if the symptom was present during the previous 7 days. If present, three characteristics of each symptom will be rated: frequency of symptom, severity of symptom, and degree of symptom distress. Frequency is rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (1=no symptom to 5=all the time), severity rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely) and distress rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely). Burden score for each symptom can range from 0 (no burden) to 4 (greatest symptom frequency, severity, and distress). The total MAS-HF scores are summed to a range of 0-180, with higher scores indicating higher symptom burden. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Cardiac FunctionBaseline and up to 3 months after enrollmentThe MindWare Mobile impedance cardiograph (model number 50-2303-00) used to measure participant's cardiac function using the parameter of cardiac output. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Oxidative StressBaseline and up to 3 months after enrollmentThe ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify 8-iso-PGF2a isoprostane in serum to reflect oxidative stress. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study briefly suspended due to administrative reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention 1 (500 mg)
Participants take vitamin C (L-Ascorbic acid) 500 mg tablet orally with one meal daily for 3 months
12
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)
Participants take vitamin C (L-Ascorbic acid) 1000 mg tablet orally with one meal daily for 3 months
12
Control (Placebo)
Participants take vitamin C placebo (Sugar pill) tablet orally with one meal daily for 3 months
12
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up321
Overall StudyStudy Suspended451

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention 1 (500 mg)Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Control (Placebo)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants11 Participants11 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants7 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants5 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants7 Participants11 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Serum Vitamin C Level at Baseline

The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data unreported for participants who refused to provide blood sample

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Serum Vitamin C Level at Baseline13372 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11555
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Serum Vitamin C Level at Baseline16079 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12564
Control (Placebo)Serum Vitamin C Level at Baseline13111 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9135
Primary

Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 3

The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Data unreported for participants who refused to provide blood sample

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 321309 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11740
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 320574 ng/mLStandard Deviation 13144
Control (Placebo)Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 312537 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7945
Secondary

Cardiac Function

The MindWare Mobile impedance cardiograph (model number 50-2303-00) used to measure participant's cardiac function using the parameter of cardiac output. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment

Population: Data missing due to staff learning curve using the MindWare Mobile impedance cardiograph and technical problems to detect signal from participants with pacemaker devices which caused inability to measure impedance cardiograph.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Cardiac FunctionBaseline6.9 L/min
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Cardiac FunctionMonth 312.7 L/min
Control (Placebo)Cardiac FunctionBaseline5.6 L/minStandard Deviation 5.1
Control (Placebo)Cardiac FunctionMonth 314.2 L/minStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life Scores

Health related quality of life is measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a patient-reported outcome to measure the patient's perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical and emotional aspects of life. The questionnaire has 21 items to assess the impact of frequent physical symptoms of heart failure and the effects of heart failure on physical and emotional functions. The response scale for all 21 items on the MLHFQ is based on a 6-point (from 0 to 5). Scores are summed to a range of 0-105, in which with higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment

Population: Data unreported for some participants due to study suspended and lost to follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresBaseline45.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.2
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresMonth 368.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresBaseline31.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresMonth 347.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.9
Control (Placebo)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresBaseline44.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
Control (Placebo)Health Related Quality of Life ScoresMonth 327.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.6
Secondary

Oxidative Stress

The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify 8-iso-PGF2a isoprostane in serum to reflect oxidative stress. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment

Population: Data unreported for participants who refused to provide blood sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Oxidative StressBaseline23144 pg/mLStandard Deviation 44504
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Oxidative Stress3 months507 pg/mLStandard Deviation 262
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Oxidative StressBaseline10406 pg/mLStandard Deviation 27203
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Oxidative Stress3 months2431 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3753
Control (Placebo)Oxidative StressBaseline13832 pg/mLStandard Deviation 20676
Control (Placebo)Oxidative Stress3 months2580 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2667
Secondary

Total MSAS-HF Score

Symptom burden is measured using items from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Heart Failure (MSAS-HF). The MSAS-HF is an 8-item questionnaire to measure HF symptoms experienced by patients with HF. Patients will be first asked if the symptom was present during the previous 7 days. If present, three characteristics of each symptom will be rated: frequency of symptom, severity of symptom, and degree of symptom distress. Frequency is rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (1=no symptom to 5=all the time), severity rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely) and distress rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely). Burden score for each symptom can range from 0 (no burden) to 4 (greatest symptom frequency, severity, and distress). The total MAS-HF scores are summed to a range of 0-180, with higher scores indicating higher symptom burden. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment

Population: Data unreported for some participants due to study suspended and lost to follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Total MSAS-HF ScoreBaseline47.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.7
Intervention 1 (500 mg)Total MSAS-HF ScoreMonth 324.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.3
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Total MSAS-HF ScoreMonth 324.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.4
Intervention 2 (1000 mg)Total MSAS-HF ScoreBaseline20.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Control (Placebo)Total MSAS-HF ScoreBaseline31.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.8
Control (Placebo)Total MSAS-HF ScoreMonth 320.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026