Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Conditions
Keywords
HA (hydroxylapatite) coated SL-PLUS™ MIA stem
Brief summary
Summary from initial protocol Goal: Validation of the HA (hydroxylapatite) coated SLPLUS ™ MIA stem within an observation study Study design: prospective, multicenter, observational, noncomparative study Study population: 300 consecutive cases (HA-coated implants), 60 cases per study site. Intervention (if applicable): Implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis Main goals/endpoints: Radiological: radiolucent lines, osteolysis, hypo- and hypertrophy of the cortex, loosening of the implant or migration. Clinical: Harris Hip Score, HOOS Score, EQ-5D, implant-related complications, revisions Type and extent of the risks associated with the study participation as well as benefits for the patient: All patients will benefit from the hip prostheses without exception. There are no increased risks for the patients participating in the study compared to patients who do not participate. Normal, necessary follow-up exams will be performed over the course of 10 years. In addition, study patients are asked to provide information on their general state of health and the condition of their hip in two questionnaires. These clinical and radiological follow-up exams will then be quantitatively evaluated within the scope of the study in accordance with a standardized protocol. Accordingly, the direct benefit for the patients from the participation in the study is currently not yet foreseeable.
Interventions
DEVICETotal Hip Arthroplasty
Total Hip Arthroplasty using the SL-PLUS™ MIA cement free hip stem
Sponsors
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Primary total hip endoprosthesis of the side affected (unilateral or bilateral) * Patient shall be provided with a HA coated SLPLUS™ MIA stem * Patient has no general medical contraindications regarding the surgery * Signed informed consent form for the participation in the study * X-ray examinations are possible * Patient is willing to participate in the post-operative follow-up program * Age: 18-75 years
Exclusion criteria
* Previous failed hip joint surgery (endoprosthesis) of the side affected * Previous infections in the joint affected; systemic infections
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| EuroQuol-5D questionnaire | up 10 years after implantation | EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal |
| Harris Hip Score | up 10 years after implantation | The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a clinician-based outcome measure frequently used for the evaluation of patients following a total hip arthroplasty |
| WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index | up 10 years after implantation | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is widely used in the evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales:\[1\] Pain (5 items): during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing upright Stiffness (2 items): after first waking and later in the day Physical Function (17 items): using stairs, rising from sitting, standing, bending, walking, getting in / out of a car, shopping, putting on / taking off socks, rising from bed, lying in bed, getting in / out of bath, sitting, getting on / off toilet, heavy domestic duties, light domestic duties |
| Survival, Kaplan Meier | up 10 years after implantation | Hip implants in situ after 10 years of follow-up |
| Intra- und perioperative implant-related Adverse Events (AE) and complications until discharge | up to patient's discharge from the hospital / clinic (from surgery up to 7 days after surgery) | Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Device Effects |
| Postoperative AE up to 10 years after the surgery | up 10 years after implantation | Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Device Effects |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Radiographic changes defined as radiolucent lines,osteolysis, hypo- and hypertrophy of the cortex, loosening of the implant or migration. | up 10 years after implantation |
Countries
Austria
Outcome results
None listed