Skip to content

The Cycle Nation Project (Phase 2: Feasibility)

The Cycle Nation Project: A Workplace Intervention to Increase the Number of People Cycling Regularly (Phase 2: Feasibility)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04035941
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
2019-08-05
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2019-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Behavior

Keywords

physical activity, cycling

Brief summary

Interventions to increase the number of people cycling regularly are likely to induce a range of health and societal benefits, including reduced incidence of heart disease, cancer and obesity, improved mental health and well-being, and reduced road congestion and air pollution. They are also likely to provide tangible financial and in-kind benefits to employers and society, through reduced workforce absenteeism, increased productivity and decreased use of NHS resources. However, increasing the number of people cycling regularly is complex and interventions undertaken to date have only been modestly successful. Thus, to induce a step-change in the number of people cycling in the United Kingdom (UK), in line with British Cycling and HSBC UK's stated aim of getting two million more people on bikes, new approaches are needed. The research team have been working with staff and management at British Cycling and HSBC to co-develop a novel, multi-component intervention for delivery at HSBC offices to increase the number of employees cycling regularly. The intervention has four main components: 1) a six (intermediate) or nine (foundation) week practical skills programme; 2) cycle provision (tune-up/loan/subsidised purchase) schemes; 3) establishment of a cycle-friendly workplace culture; 4) a cycle app. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of this intervention in a before-and-after study in four HSBC offices around the UK.

Detailed description

Objective: To assess the feasibility of the novel multicomponent workplace cycling intervention that aims to support more employees to cycle regularly. There are eight related research questions: 1. Can sufficient (\ 20-30) employees per HSBC office be recruited to take part in the intervention? 2. Can participants be retained in the study for up to three months? 3. To what extent do participants receive the intervention as intended (exposure)? 4. To what extent is the intervention acceptable to participants, those leading the intervention (local cycle champions), local HSBC office management and local bike providers? 5. How feasible and acceptable is it to conduct a suite of measurements, including self-report questionnaires, objective physical activity and blood biomarkers of cardiovascular disease, in this setting? 6. Does the intervention have potential to increase cycling and cycle journeys (likely primary outcomes in a future RCT)? 7. To what extent do participants improve on a range of behavioural, psychological, clinical and work-related outcomes? 8. Does the intervention have potential to be cost-effective, and what are the range of cost and benefit outcomes that are to be considered? Setting and Participants: The study will be conducted at four HSBC offices across the UK, which have some degree of on-site cycle infrastructure (e.g. secure bike racks, showers, lockers). At each office, up to 40 participants will be recruited to either the foundation (nine-week) or intermediate (six-week) practical skills programme (up to 160 participants in total across the four sites). Participants will be self-identified infrequent cyclists (currently cycle less than once per month or not at all) aged 18 years or over who are current HSBC employees. Interventions: The intervention has four main components. 1. Practical skills programme: this has two versions - a core six-week programme (intermediate), with an additional three weeks (nine weeks in total - foundation) covering basic cycling skills. It is designed to be delivered at HSBC offices by trained 'cycle champions' - ideally HSBC staff members. Each session includes group-based learning activities and in-saddle, off- and on-road practical cycle training. Participants will receive information delivered simply in handbook format with a toolkit of skills and behaviour change techniques (e.g. goal setting) participants can apply to increase their cycling and maintain this long-term. 2. Cycle provision scheme: participants will have the opportunity to have their own bicycles serviced or obtain a loaned bike or e-bike from local bike shops before the start of the programme. At the end of the programme, participants will be given support and advice to take part in the HSBC subsidised cycle purchase bike to work scheme. 3. Cycle-friendly workplace culture: all of the HSBC offices taking part in the study will have a minimum of secure bike locks as part of an ongoing roll-out of cycle infrastructure across HSBC UK offices. During training, the cycle champion will be asked to identify (and subsequently implement) other cycle-friendly features (e.g. availability of cycle tools and spares, flexible hours to avoid peak commuter traffic, flexible dress code, altruistic reward scheme for cycling). 4. Our Cycle Hub app: an adapted version of an existing HSBC app including route planning, goal setting and practical skills videos, as well as supportive social interaction among participants. Outcomes: The feasibility study will assess: recruitment, retention, adherence, feasibility of delivery of all components, fidelity to intervention protocol, acceptability (to participants and cycle champions, other staff in the office who are not doing the practical skills programme but are exposed to the cycle-friendly culture, HSBC office managers and bike providers), and likely primary outcomes of any future randomised controlled trial (RCT) - number of people cycling regularly (both monthly and weekly) and number of cycling journeys for transport or leisure in the last month, both self-reported. The investigators will also assess likely secondary outcomes in a future RCT at baseline, 9 weeks, and 13 weeks. 1. behavioural - objectively-measured cycling and other physical activity (using the activPAL device and a new algorithm specifically-developed to detect cycling) and self-reported cycling activity, modes of transport, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, dietary intake. 2. psychological - self-reported motivation, autonomy, competence, relatedness and perceptions of safety in relation to cycling, wellbeing, self-esteem, vitality, quality of life and perceived general physical health. 3. work-related - productivity, job satisfaction, occupational stress, absenteeism and presenteeism. 4. clinical - objectively-measured weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Cardio-metabolic disease risk biomarkers related to glucose, insulin, HbA1c, lipids and liver function will be assessed at baseline and 13 weeks only (opt in). Participant characteristics (e.g. date of birth, gender, postcode of residence, marital status, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, job description) will be recorded at baseline only. Extent of delivery, acceptability and perceived utility of programme components (practical skills programme components, bike provision, cycle-friendly culture and cycle app), and acceptability of the study procedures will be assessed at follow up only. Adverse events and injury will be assessed at all time points. Health economists will work with HSBC head office staff to identify available sources of cost and benefit data throughout the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCycle Nation Multicomponent Intervention

This intervention group will receive 4 elements: 1. Practical skills programme: a workplace-based programme covering basic cycling skills, delivered by trained 'cycle champions' - HSBC staff members. 2. Cycle provision scheme: participants will have the opportunity to have their own bicycles serviced or obtain a loaned bike or e-bike from local bike shops before the start of the programme. 3. Cycle-friendly workplace culture: all offices taking part will have a minimum of secure bike parking facilities as part of an ongoing roll-out of cycle infrastructure across HSBC UK offices. 4. Our Cycle Hub app: an adapted version of an existing HSBC app including route planning, goal setting and practical skills videos, as well as supportive social interaction among participants.

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Glasgow
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Study design: A before-and-after feasibility study with follow up to six months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any staff members who currently cycle less than once per month or not at all

Exclusion criteria

* Staff members who currently cycle more than once per month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant questionnaire: Likert scale of training course acceptability9 weeksSelf-reported questionnaire measured acceptability of all elements of intervention delivery
Cycle Champion interviews: acceptability of cycle training course delivery9 weeksInterview measured acceptability of all elements of intervention delivery (cycle champions)
Feasibility of intervention delivery: Investigator conducted session observations9 weeksTo measure the feasibility of delivery of all cycle training components by investigator conducted session observations.
Feasibility of intervention delivery: Investigator conducted interviews9 weeksTo measure the feasibility of delivery of all cycle training components by investigator conducted interviews with cycle champions.
Cycling behaviourChange from baseline to 13 weeksSelf reported number of people cycling regularly (both monthly and weekly) and number of cycling journeys for transport or leisure in the last month.
Participant and Cycle Champion recruitmentConducted pre baselineMeaseurement of the recruitment of participants and cycle champions.
Participant and Cycle Champion retentionChange from baseline to 9 weeksMeasurement of the number of participants and cycle champions who undertake the training course to completion, as well as participant drop-out
Participant adherence to the cycle training courseThrough study completion to 9 weeksMeasurement of participant attendance to training sessions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant self-reported work-related stress: Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured work-related stress adapted from Kessler et al's World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ)
Participant self-reported autonomy: Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured autonomy adapted from Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 75e102.
Participant self-reported competence: 6 item Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured competence adapted from Roberts, G.C., Treasure D. C., & Balague, G. (1998). Achievement goals in sport: The development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Sciences. 19, 337-347.
Participant self-reported relatedness: 6 item Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured relatedness adapted from Van den Broeck et al (2010). J Occup Organiz Psych 83:981-1002
Participant self-reported perceptions of cycling safety: 5 item Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured scale of perceptions of cycling safety
Participant self-reported self esteem: 10 item Rosenberg scale of self esteemChange from baseline to 13 weeksSelf-esteem questionnaire
Participant self-reported vitality: 4 item Bostic scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeks4-item scale of vitality (Bostic, T. J., McGartland-Rubio, D., & Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling)
Participant self-reported general physical health: EQ-5D-5LChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measure of health-related quality of life
Body massChange from baseline to 13 weeksBody mass in kilograms
Body Mass Index (BMI)Change from baseline to 13 weeksWeight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
Waist circumferenceChange from baseline to 13 weeksWaist circumference in centimeters
Participant self-reported wellbeing: 14 item Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales - WEMWBSChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured participant wellbeing.
Objectively-measured incidental physical activityChange from baseline to 13 weeksMinutes spent in activity per day measured using the activPAL device.
Participant questionnaire reported motivation: 15 item Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeks15 item scale adapted from Markland, D. & Tobin, V. (2004). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 191-196 (BREQ-2 for PA)
Participant questionnaire measured work-related productivity: Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksLikert scale of productivity adapted from Kessler et al's World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ)
Participant self-reported monthly cycling activity: number of rides and durationChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured of cycling activity adapted from Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003, 35:1381-1395. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003, 35:1381-1395. Adapted DINE questionnaire: Roe L, Strong C, Whiteside C, Neil A, Mant D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 375-81.
Participant self-reported dietry intake: DINE questionnaireChange from baseline to 13 weeksAdapted DINE questionnaire: Roe L, Strong C, Whiteside C, Neil A, Mant D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 375-81.
Participant self-reported number of days of work-related absenteeism/presenteeismChange from baseline to 13 weeksSelf reported days per month of absenteeism/presenteeism adapted from Kessler et al's World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ)
Participant self reported job satisfaction: Likert scaleChange from baseline to 13 weeksQuestionnaire measured job satisfaction adapted from Kessler et al's World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood pressureChange from baseline to 13 weeks
Homestasis Model Estimated Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)Change from baseline to 13 weeksCalculated from fasting insulin and glucose concentrations

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactGreig RM Logan, PhD
greig.logan@glasgow.ac.uk01413304377
Backup ContactJason MR Gill, PhD
jason.gill@glasgow.ac.uk01413302916

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026