Skip to content

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LOU064 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Sjögren's Syndrome

An Adaptive Phase 2 Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Multiple LOU064 Doses in Patients With Moderate to Severe Sjögren's Syndrome (LOUiSSe)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04035668
Acronym
LOUiSSe
Enrollment
73
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
2019-07-12
Completion date
2021-11-23
Last updated
2023-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sjögren Syndrome

Keywords

LOU064, remibrutinib, Sjogren Syndrome, Dry Eye Syndromes, Pathological Processes, Arthritis, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Rheumatic Diseases, Xerostomia, Salivary Gland Diseases, Mouth Diseases, Stomatognathic Diseases, Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases, Eye Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases, Immune System Diseases

Brief summary

This was an adaptive design phase 2 study to establish safety and efficacy; and to characterize the dose-response of LOU064 in subjects with moderate to severe Sjögren's syndrome. LOU064 is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor.

Detailed description

This study was planned as an adaptive Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, integrated dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple remibrutinib doses in patients with moderate to severe Sjögren's Syndrome. Of the initially planned two parts, only Part 1 of the study was conducted. In Part 1, the highest expected biologically active single dose of remibrutinib (100 mg) was tested in two different dosing regimens, a once daily dose (qd) or twice daily dose (bid), and compared to the placebo group. Each patient in Part 1 of the study underwent a screening period of up to 6 weeks, a treatment period of 24 weeks, and a follow-up period of 30 days post-treatment before the End of Study (EOS) visit. The total duration for each patient in the study, including Screening, was up to 35 weeks. For the treatment period, patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the 3 treatment groups: remibrutinib 100 mg bid, remibrutinib 100 mg qd and placebo.

Interventions

Remibrutinib 100 mg was administered orally as two 50 mg hard gelatin capsules. Patients in the remibrutinib 100 mg bid dose group took 2 capsules of active medication in the morning and 2 capsules of active medication in the evening. Patients in the remibrutinib 100 mg qd dose group took 2 capsules of active medication in the morning and 2 capsules of the placebo in the evening.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo was administered orally as two hard gelatin capsules. Patients in the placebo dose group took 2 capsules of placebo in the morning and 2 capsules of placebo in the evening.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of SjS according to the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria * Screening ESSDAI (based on weighted score) ≥ 5 derived from 8 domains * Screening ESSPRI ≥ 5 * Seropositive for anti-Ro/SSA antibodies at or within 3 months prior to screening * Unstimulated salivary flow \> 0 mL/min.

Exclusion criteria

* Sjögren's Syndrome overlap syndromes with another autoimmune disease as primary illness * DMARDs or kinase inhibitors within 3 months prior to baseline above certain doses OR maintained during study * Rituximab or other B cell depleting drug within 12 months of Screening . * Current use of prednisone or equivalent \> 15mg/d or dose change within 2 weeks prior to Screening * Use of medication known to cause, as a major side effect, dry mouth / eyes * HIV, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, known or suspected history of an ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease such as tuberculosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. The instrument contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity: constitutional, lymphadenopathy, glandular, articular, cutaneous, pulmonary, renal, muscular, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological and biological. For each domain, features of disease activity were scored according to their severity. These scores were summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. ESSDAI total score ranges from 0 to 123 with higher values indicating more disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSDAI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24ESSPRI is an established disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. It consists of three domains of dryness, pain, and fatigue. The patient can assess the severity of symptoms they experience on a single 0-10 numerical scale for each of the three domains. The ESSPRI score is defined as the mean of scores from the three scales: (dryness + pain +fatigue) /3. ESSPRI total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more disease symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSPRI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24FACIT-F v4 is a short, 13-item, easy-to-administer tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). FACIT-F total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values indicating higher quality of life (less fatigue). A positive change from baseline is a favorable outcome. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in FACIT-F for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.
Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeBaseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24EQ-5D is a standardized instrument that measures the health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog scale (VAS).The EQ-5D VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale with 0 representing 'Worst imaginable Health State' and 100 'Best imaginable Health State'. A positive change from baseline is a favorable outcome. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeBaseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24The physician's global assessment scale was used for the Investigator to rate the disease activity of their patient using 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no disease activity (0) to maximal disease activity (100). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in PhGA score for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFrom first dose of study treatment up 30 days after last dose (Week 29)Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as TEAEs. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that started after the first dose of study medications or adverse events present prior to start of double-blind treatment but increased in severity. The number of participants in each category is reported in the table.
Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed blood concentration following a dose.
Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed blood concentration following a dose.
Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeBaseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 and Week 20ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. The instrument contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity: constitutional, lymphadenopathy, glandular, articular, cutaneous, pulmonary, renal, muscular, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological and biological. For each domain, features of disease activity were scored according to their severity. These scores were summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. ESSDAI total score ranges from 0 to 123 with higher values indicating more disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSDAI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) blood concentration following a dose.
Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 4pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUCtau is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve calculated/extrapolated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state. Tau was 24 hours for the qd dosing group and 12 hours for the bid dosing group. For the calculation of AUCtau, the pre-dose concentrations at Week 4 and Week 24 were duplicated as 24 hours and 12 hours concentrations for the qd and bid groups, respectively. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUCtau calculation.
Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 24pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUCtau is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve calculated/extrapolated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state. Tau was 24 hours for the qd dosing group and 12 hours for the bid dosing group. For the calculation of AUCtau, the pre-dose concentrations at Week 4 and Week 24 were duplicated as 24 hours and 12 hours concentrations for the qd and bid groups, respectively. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUCtau calculation.
Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 4pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUC0-4h is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours post-dose, which was the last sampling time. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-4h calculation.
Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 24pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUC0-4h is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours post-dose, which was the last sampling time. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-4h calculation.
Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 4pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. T1/2 is defined as the time taken for the blood concentration, as well as the amount of the drug in the body, to fall by one-half.
Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 24pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. T1/2 is defined as the time taken for the blood concentration, as well as the amount of the drug in the body, to fall by one-half.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) blood concentration following a dose.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 26 investigative sites in 12 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The screening period of up to 6 weeks began after the subject had provided written informed consent. Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the 3 treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Remibrutinib 100 mg Bid
Remibrutinib 100 mg twice daily (bid)
24
Remibrutinib 100 mg qd
Remibrutinib 100 mg once daily (qd)
25
Placebo
Placebo group
24
Total73

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event342
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision211
Overall StudySubject Decision220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRemibrutinib 100 mg BidRemibrutinib 100 mg qdPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.21
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
17 Participants17 Participants16 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants24 Participants23 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 250 / 490 / 240 / 73
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 2412 / 2527 / 4917 / 2444 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 241 / 252 / 491 / 243 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24

ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. The instrument contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity: constitutional, lymphadenopathy, glandular, articular, cutaneous, pulmonary, renal, muscular, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological and biological. For each domain, features of disease activity were scored according to their severity. These scores were summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. ESSDAI total score ranges from 0 to 123 with higher values indicating more disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSDAI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24-4.70 score on scaleStandard Error 0.78
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24-3.70 score on scaleStandard Error 0.8
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24-4.20 score on scaleStandard Error 0.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Total Score at Week 24-1.34 score on scaleStandard Error 0.74
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-4.71, -1.01]MMRM
95% CI: [-3.24, 1.25]MMRM
Secondary

Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 24

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUC0-4h is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours post-dose, which was the last sampling time. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-4h calculation.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 24420 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 259
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 24317 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 144
Secondary

Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 4

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUC0-4h is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours post-dose, which was the last sampling time. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-4h calculation.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 4351 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 169
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-4h) of Remibrutinib at Week 4393 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 207
Secondary

Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 24

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUCtau is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve calculated/extrapolated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state. Tau was 24 hours for the qd dosing group and 12 hours for the bid dosing group. For the calculation of AUCtau, the pre-dose concentrations at Week 4 and Week 24 were duplicated as 24 hours and 12 hours concentrations for the qd and bid groups, respectively. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUCtau calculation.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 24670 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 380
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 24636 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 306
Secondary

Area Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 4

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. AUCtau is defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve calculated/extrapolated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state. Tau was 24 hours for the qd dosing group and 12 hours for the bid dosing group. For the calculation of AUCtau, the pre-dose concentrations at Week 4 and Week 24 were duplicated as 24 hours and 12 hours concentrations for the qd and bid groups, respectively. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUCtau calculation.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 4569 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 311
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidArea Under the Blood Concentration-time Curve Within a Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady-state (AUCtau) of Remibrutinib at Week 41020 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 700
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over Time

ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. The instrument contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity: constitutional, lymphadenopathy, glandular, articular, cutaneous, pulmonary, renal, muscular, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological and biological. For each domain, features of disease activity were scored according to their severity. These scores were summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. ESSDAI total score ranges from 0 to 123 with higher values indicating more disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSDAI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 and Week 20

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.74 score on scaleStandard Error 0.72
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.57 score on scaleStandard Error 0.6
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-3.66 score on scaleStandard Error 0.74
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-4.40 score on scaleStandard Error 0.73
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-4.02 score on scaleStandard Error 0.71
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.68 score on scaleStandard Error 0.52
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.93 score on scaleStandard Error 0.71
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.05 score on scaleStandard Error 0.52
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.54 score on scaleStandard Error 0.62
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-2.56 score on scaleStandard Error 0.75
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-2.57 score on scaleStandard Error 0.74
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-3.26 score on scaleStandard Error 0.75
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.37 score on scaleStandard Error 0.37
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-3.11 score on scaleStandard Error 0.53
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.83 score on scaleStandard Error 0.51
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-3.83 score on scaleStandard Error 0.52
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-3.29 score on scaleStandard Error 0.51
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.55 score on scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-0.37 score on scaleStandard Error 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.36 score on scaleStandard Error 0.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-1.84 score on scaleStandard Error 0.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.79 score on scaleStandard Error 0.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.92 score on scaleStandard Error 0.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ESSDAI Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-2.16 score on scaleStandard Error 0.69
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.06595% CI: [-2.29, 0.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-3.24, -0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.28995% CI: [-2.17, 1.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.09395% CI: [-2.97, 0.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.09495% CI: [-2.84, 0.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-3.71, -0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-2.1, 0.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-1.75, 1.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-1.83, 2.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-3.2, 1.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-3.5, 0.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2095% CI: [-3.22, 0.95]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over Time

ESSPRI is an established disease outcome measure for Sjögren's Syndrome. It consists of three domains of dryness, pain, and fatigue. The patient can assess the severity of symptoms they experience on a single 0-10 numerical scale for each of the three domains. The ESSPRI score is defined as the mean of scores from the three scales: (dryness + pain +fatigue) /3. ESSPRI total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more disease symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in ESSPRI for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.17 score on scaleStandard Error 0.34
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.77 score on scaleStandard Error 0.36
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.83 score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.72 score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.88 score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.92 score on scaleStandard Error 0.38
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-0.44 score on scaleStandard Error 0.26
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20.18 score on scaleStandard Error 0.26
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.32 score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.14 score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.38 score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.39 score on scaleStandard Error 0.37
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.74 score on scaleStandard Error 0.39
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 24-0.76 score on scaleStandard Error 0.35
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.60 score on scaleStandard Error 0.22
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-0.13 score on scaleStandard Error 0.18
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.43 score on scaleStandard Error 0.21
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 24-0.96 score on scaleStandard Error 0.24
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.58 score on scaleStandard Error 0.26
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.83 score on scaleStandard Error 0.27
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.60 score on scaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.92 score on scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.71 score on scaleStandard Error 0.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-0.09 score on scaleStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.35 score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.66 score on scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.13 score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Total Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.57 score on scaleStandard Error 0.29
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.4695% CI: [-0.69, 0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.41895% CI: [-0.82, 0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.46695% CI: [-0.76, 0.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.5695% CI: [-0.67, 0.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.61695% CI: [-0.73, 0.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.58195% CI: [-0.81, 0.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.66395% CI: [-0.62, 0.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-1.35, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-1.42, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-1.31, 0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-1.44, 0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-1.39, 0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2095% CI: [-1.39, 0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [-1.37, 0.57]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over Time

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument that measures the health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog scale (VAS).The EQ-5D VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale with 0 representing 'Worst imaginable Health State' and 100 'Best imaginable Health State'. A positive change from baseline is a favorable outcome. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 2-3.05 score on scaleStandard Error 3.11
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.74 score on scaleStandard Error 2.71
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 81.46 score on scaleStandard Error 3.2
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 12-2.36 score on scaleStandard Error 2.71
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.44 score on scaleStandard Error 3.27
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.91 score on scaleStandard Error 3.15
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 241.81 score on scaleStandard Error 3.47
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 205.37 score on scaleStandard Error 3.33
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.03 score on scaleStandard Error 2.86
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 121.58 score on scaleStandard Error 2.82
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 245.73 score on scaleStandard Error 3.65
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 164.27 score on scaleStandard Error 3.54
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 81.76 score on scaleStandard Error 3.2
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 2-2.86 score on scaleStandard Error 3.16
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 243.77 score on scaleStandard Error 2.52
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 2-2.95 score on scaleStandard Error 2.22
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.88 score on scaleStandard Error 1.97
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.39 score on scaleStandard Error 1.95
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 161.92 score on scaleStandard Error 2.41
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 81.61 score on scaleStandard Error 2.26
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 202.23 score on scaleStandard Error 2.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 83.44 score on scaleStandard Error 3.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 124.00 score on scaleStandard Error 2.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 2-3.02 score on scaleStandard Error 3.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 161.79 score on scaleStandard Error 3.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 42.99 score on scaleStandard Error 2.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 205.29 score on scaleStandard Error 3.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS Score Over TimeWeek 242.07 score on scaleStandard Error 3.22
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.49495% CI: [-7.84, 7.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.86695% CI: [-10.81, 3.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.68495% CI: [-9.37, 5.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.90895% CI: [-10.93, 2.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.48795% CI: [-8, 8.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.7995% CI: [-10.61, 4.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-6.48, 9.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-9.06, 8.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-9.59, 6.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-9.34, 8.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-11.74, 3.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-14.34, 4.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2095% CI: [-15.44, 2.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [-14.01, 6.16]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over Time

FACIT-F v4 is a short, 13-item, easy-to-administer tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). FACIT-F total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values indicating higher quality of life (less fatigue). A positive change from baseline is a favorable outcome. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in FACIT-F for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 2010.01 score on scaleStandard Error 2.2
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 248.17 score on scaleStandard Error 2.45
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 21.80 score on scaleStandard Error 1.32
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 44.83 score on scaleStandard Error 1.5
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 84.00 score on scaleStandard Error 1.64
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 164.40 score on scaleStandard Error 1.97
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 124.88 score on scaleStandard Error 1.8
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 2-0.51 score on scaleStandard Error 1.35
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 163.29 score on scaleStandard Error 2.08
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 43.97 score on scaleStandard Error 1.57
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 124.25 score on scaleStandard Error 1.86
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 83.79 score on scaleStandard Error 1.66
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 204.32 score on scaleStandard Error 2.3
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 244.64 score on scaleStandard Error 2.55
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 83.90 score on scaleStandard Error 1.17
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 20.64 score on scaleStandard Error 0.95
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 124.56 score on scaleStandard Error 1.3
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 163.84 score on scaleStandard Error 1.44
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 207.16 score on scaleStandard Error 1.6
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 44.40 score on scaleStandard Error 1.09
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 246.40 score on scaleStandard Error 1.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 247.45 score on scaleStandard Error 2.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 127.30 score on scaleStandard Error 1.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 167.73 score on scaleStandard Error 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 23.37 score on scaleStandard Error 1.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 85.26 score on scaleStandard Error 1.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 205.77 score on scaleStandard Error 2.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Total Score Over TimeWeek 43.51 score on scaleStandard Error 1.58
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.9495% CI: [-6.18, 0.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.32295% CI: [-2.95, 4.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.75395% CI: [-5.32, 2.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.89195% CI: [-7.13, 1.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.94195% CI: [-8.77, 1.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.30495% CI: [-4.01, 6.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.6495% CI: [-6.89, 4.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-1.44, 6.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-3.46, 5.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-4.43, 4.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-4.53, 5.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-4.6, 6.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2095% CI: [-0.66, 12.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [-3.53, 10.59]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over Time

The physician's global assessment scale was used for the Investigator to rate the disease activity of their patient using 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no disease activity (0) to maximal disease activity (100). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The baseline value is defined as the last assessment performed prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in PhGA score for all post-baseline time points up to Week 24. Values estimated from the model are presented in this table.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. FAS included all participants who were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 2-4.21 score on scaleStandard Error 2.9
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 12-13.85 score on scaleStandard Error 3.63
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 8-13.68 score on scaleStandard Error 3.39
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 24-21.25 score on scaleStandard Error 3.88
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 20-23.56 score on scaleStandard Error 3.43
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 16-19.37 score on scaleStandard Error 3.61
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 4-9.58 score on scaleStandard Error 2.89
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 2-4.02 score on scaleStandard Error 2.85
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 12-9.45 score on scaleStandard Error 3.68
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 24-13.15 score on scaleStandard Error 3.95
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 4-8.93 score on scaleStandard Error 2.96
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 8-13.78 score on scaleStandard Error 3.28
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 16-7.25 score on scaleStandard Error 3.74
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 20-17.31 score on scaleStandard Error 3.48
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 8-13.73 score on scaleStandard Error 2.37
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 2-4.12 score on scaleStandard Error 2.04
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 20-20.43 score on scaleStandard Error 2.45
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 24-17.20 score on scaleStandard Error 2.78
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 4-9.26 score on scaleStandard Error 2.08
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 16-13.31 score on scaleStandard Error 2.61
Any RemibrutinibChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 12-11.65 score on scaleStandard Error 2.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 2-4.82 score on scaleStandard Error 3.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 8-13.23 score on scaleStandard Error 3.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 16-15.90 score on scaleStandard Error 3.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 12-17.67 score on scaleStandard Error 3.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 24-20.15 score on scaleStandard Error 3.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 20-17.57 score on scaleStandard Error 3.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Scale (PhGA) Score Over TimeWeek 4-7.28 score on scaleStandard Error 2.95
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.57595% CI: [-6.75, 8.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.29495% CI: [-9.22, 5.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.4595% CI: [-8.4, 7.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.91395% CI: [-2.74, 14.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.72295% CI: [-6.16, 11.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.24195% CI: [-10.96, 5.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.74295% CI: [-6.09, 11.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-8.28, 7.91]MMRM
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-8.87, 7.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-9.28, 9.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-14.71, 5.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-22.47, -1.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2095% CI: [-16, 3.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2495% CI: [-19.16, 2.96]MMRM
Secondary

Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 24

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. T1/2 is defined as the time taken for the blood concentration, as well as the amount of the drug in the body, to fall by one-half.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdElimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 243.15 hoursStandard Deviation 0.907
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidElimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 243.88 hoursStandard Deviation 1.95
Secondary

Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 4

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. T1/2 is defined as the time taken for the blood concentration, as well as the amount of the drug in the body, to fall by one-half.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdElimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 43.08 hoursStandard Deviation 0.998
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidElimination Half-life (T1/2) of Remibrutinib at Week 43.86 hoursStandard Deviation 2.28
Secondary

Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed blood concentration following a dose.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdMaximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24224 ng/mLStandard Deviation 202
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidMaximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24169 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.9
Secondary

Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed blood concentration following a dose.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdMaximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4183 ng/mLStandard Deviation 82.5
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidMaximum Observed Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4225 ng/mLStandard Deviation 154
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as TEAEs. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that started after the first dose of study medications or adverse events present prior to start of double-blind treatment but increased in severity. The number of participants in each category is reported in the table.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up 30 days after last dose (Week 29)

Population: Safety Analysis Set defined as participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAE22 Participants
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsStudy drug-related TEAE10 Participants
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsStudy drug-related TEAE8 Participants
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAE21 Participants
Any RemibrutinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Any RemibrutinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsStudy drug-related TEAE9 Participants
Any RemibrutinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAE20 Participants
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 24

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) blood concentration following a dose.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 24

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdTime to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 241.00 hours
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidTime to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 241.00 hours
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 4

Remibrutinib was determined in whole blood by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on remibrutinib blood concentrations by using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8 or higher). Concentrations below the LLOQ were treated as zero. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) blood concentration following a dose.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (PKS) with a valid value for the outcome measure. PKS is defined as participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any study drug, and with no protocol deviations that impact PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Remibrutinib 100 mg qdTime to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 41.00 hours
Remibrutinib 100 mg BidTime to Reach Maximum Observed Blood Concentration (Tmax) of Remibrutinib at Week 41.00 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026