Skip to content

A Pilot Study Comparing Oxygen Delivery Via Helmet Interface Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study of Non-invasive Oxygenation and Ventilation in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF): A Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Via Helmet Interface Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04035460
Acronym
NOVA-pilot
Enrollment
1
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2021-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

non-invasive ventilation

Brief summary

Our main objective is to collect feasibility data on helmet NIPPV and other clinical elements in to eventually prepare for a full scale randomized trial based on findings of this pilot study.

Detailed description

Patients with acute hypoxemia leading to respiratory failure are frequently supported by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Unfortunately an invasive approach to support is associated with risks of lung injury, infection, need for heavy sedation, and increased mortality. Non-invasive oxygen delivery, by mask (BiPAP or CPAP), high flow nasal cannula or helmet interface, is better tolerated and reduces risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. A growing body of medical literature and clinical experience suggests that non-invasive oxygen delivery can prevent the need for endotracheal intubation in some patients. This proposal will compare two different modes of non-invasive oxygen delivery: helmet and high flow nasal cannula.

Interventions

DEVICEHelmet

The helmet encloses the head and neck of the patient, has a rigid ring and is secured by 2 armpit braces. A soft collar adheres to the neck and ensures a sealed connection once the helmet is inflated.

Large-bore nasal prongs through which oxygen is delivered at high flow rates

Sponsors

Baystate Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. AHRF defined as: A ratio of partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) between 100 - 250 mm Hg while breathing O2 from Venturi mask, or other delivery system that allows quantification of FiO2 such as Mask-NIPPV or HFNC. When no arterial blood gas (ABG) result available, use transcutaneous oxygen saturation measurement (SpO2) to impute PaO2 (Appendix A.2 for Table of PaO2 / FiO2 imputed from SpO2 \[Brown 2017\]. If no oxygenation data prior to use of Mask-NIPPV or HFNC are available, then P/F ratio 100 - 250 on Mask-NIPPV or HFNC meets this criterion. 3. Respiratory rate (RR) ≥24 /min and/or subjective shortness of breath (Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale ≥ 2)

Exclusion criteria

1. P/F Ratio \< 100 (Severe ARDS) on quantifiable FiO2 2. More than 24 hours has elapsed since the patient met criteria for AHRF (Inclusion #2 and 3, above) 3. Urgent need for intubation Criteria for intubation: i. RR\>40 ii. Lack of improvement of respiratory muscle fatigue iii. Copious tracheal secretions that require frequent suctioning iv. Acidosis with a potential Hydrogen (pH) \<7.35 v. Acute hypercarbia (PaCO2 \> 45 mm Hg) vi. SpO2 \< 88% for more than 5 minutes despite FiO2 and non-invasive support vii. Respiratory or cardiac arrest viii. Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 4. Contraindication to HFNC, Helmet-NIPPV, or Mask-NIPPV 5. Upper airway obstruction, facial trauma 6. Copious secretions, airway bleeding, epistaxis or vomiting 7. Primary cause of respiratory failure is exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma 8. Elevated intracranial pressure \>20 mm Hg 9. Home mechanical ventilation except for CPAP/BiPAP used solely for sleep disordered breathing 10. Persistent hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure (SBP)\<90 or mean arterial pressure (MAP)\<60 despite IV fluid resuscitation, or norepinephrine dose \> 0.1 mcg/kg/min or equivalent vasopressor dose) 11. Plan for procedure during which NIPPV or HFNC is contraindicated. Okay to enroll if procedure is complete and AHRF persists within 24 hours. 12. Absence of airway protective gag reflex or cough 13. Tracheostomy 14. Lack of informed consent 15. Pregnancy 16. Actual body weight exceeding 1 kg per cm of height 17. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage 18. Severe acute pancreatitis as etiology for hypoxemia 19. Recent upper gastrointestinal surgical anastomosis within the past 30 days 20. Enrollment in another clinical trial within the past 30 days 21. Unsuitable for non-invasive ventilation in the judgment of the treating MD 22. Decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment. Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) or No Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (No CPR) order may be enrolled. 23. Do not intubate order

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of intubation28 daysTo determine the rates of intubation for subjects with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF) managed by non-invasive modalities High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Helmet NIPPV.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubation28 daysHours and minutes from time of initiation of protocol until intubation
Intubation-free days through day 2828 daysnumber of days from the time of randomization to day 28 after randomization on which the patient is not intubated and does not require invasive mechanical ventilation
Organ-failure-free days through day 2828 daysDaily determination of presence or absence of Cardiovascular, Kidney, Liver, Central Nervous System, and Hematological Dysfunction.
Mortality prior to discharge from hospital (up to study day 90 whichever comes first)90 dayshospital mortality
Hospital mortality to day 2828 dayshospital mortality
ICU free-days to day 2828 daysdays not in ICU
Hospital length of stay28 daysduration of hospital stay
Rate of cross-over between groups28 daysThe percentage of patients in each group crossed over to the alternative group or another form of noninvasive ventilation.
Complications28 daysAdverse events other than failure of the noninvasive oxygenation device
Ventilator associated pneumonia, barotrauma28 daysComplications due to mechanical ventilation
Total daily dose of sedative medications (milligram)7 daysAssessment of Sedation medications
Highest level of daily mobility through day 77 daysActivity level
Tolerance of the devices28 daysDaily assessment with visual analog scale for comfort, range 0-5, with 0= no discomfort and 5=unable to tolerate
Rate and reason for exclusion from enrollment to this trial of Helmet-NIPPV vs. HFNCthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearReasons for exclusion of patients meeting inclusion criteria
Rate of intubation in non-enrolled patients that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria28 daysUsual care comparison
Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS)7 daysHighest daily RASS score. The scale range is -5 to +4 in integer increments, Where -5 is unarousable, 0 is alert and calm, and +4 is combative
Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)7 daysDaily assessment of presence or absence of delirium

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026