Skip to content

Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04034069
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-07-26
Start date
2019-09-09
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

stroke, theta burst stimulation, upper limb, metaplasticity, priming

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation primed with continous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) on improving the upper limb motor functions of stroke survivors and to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity with electroencephalography (EEG).

Detailed description

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered to the affected primary motor cortex (M1) appears to enhance the brain response to rehabilitative intervention in patients with stroke. However, its clinical utility is highly affected by the response variability. New evidence has reported that preceding iTBS with a priming session of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), may stabilize and even boost the facilitatory effect of iTBS on the stimulated M1, via metaplasticity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of iTBS primed with cTBS, on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) on improving the upper limb motor functions of patients with chronic stroke and to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity with electroencephalography (EEG). A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed with an estimated total of 36 patients with subacute or chronic stroke. All participants will be randomly allocated to receive 10-session intervention of different TBS protocols (i.e., cTBS+iTBS, sham cTBS+iTBS and sham cTBS+sham iTBS), delivered for 3-5 sessions per week, lasting for 2-3 weeks. All participants will receive a 60-minute standard RAT after each stimulation session. Primary outcome will be Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes will be Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), kinematic outcomes generated during RAT as well as and EEG.

Interventions

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a potent form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can enhance the corticomotor excitability, whereas standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can suppress the corticomotor excitability. Sham stimulation uses an extreme low stimulation intensity which will not influence with corticomotor excitability. In the present study, real stimulation will be delivered in an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold while sham stimulation will be delivered in an intensity of 20% individual resting motor threshold.

Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device. HandyRehab hand robot (Zunosaki Company Ltd., Hong Kong SAR) will be used for upper limb distal joints training. It is an exoskeleton over the hand which provides power-driven extension and grasping force to the fingers and thumb in order to assist the patient to open and close the paretic hand by means of surface electromyography-triggered from the signals through the forearm extensors and flexors.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* with a diagnosis of a unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; * with stroke onset more than 6 months; * from 18 to 75 years old; * with mild to moderate impairment of upper limb functions due to stroke, measured using the Hong Kong Version of the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK) from level 2 to level 7; * be able to understand verbal instruction and follow one-step commands; * be able to give informed consent to participate;

Exclusion criteria

* any contraindications to rTMS/TBS, such as unstable medical condition, history of epileptic seizures, metal implants in vivo (eg, pacemaker, artificial cochlear, and implant brain stimulator), and a history of receiving craniotomy; * previous diagnosis of any neurological disease excluding stroke; * presence of any sign of cognitive problems (Abbreviated mental test Hong Kong version \< 6/10); * patients with extreme spasticity in any hemiplegic upper limb joint (Modified Ashworth score \> 2) or severe pain that hinder the upper limb motor training; * with other notable impairment of the upper limb affected by stroke, eg, recent fracture, severe osteoarthritis, congenital upper limb deformity * any sign of anxiety or depression, as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. * concurrent participation in an upper limb rehabilitation program or a medicine trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE)BaselineFMA-UE is a standard upper limb motor impairment assessment for stroke survivors. FMA-UE assesses voluntary movement, reflex activity, grasp and coordination.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)BaselineARAT is a standard upper limb functional performance assessment for stroke survivors. ARAT assesses a patient's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape. ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensorimotor event-related desynchronizationBaselineElectroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by movement and mirror visual feedback-based observation of movement
Mean velocityBaselineMean velocity is a quantified assessment for movement efficiency during robot-assisted training with Fourier M2 device.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026