Skip to content

Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Using Biological Mesh With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Following ELAPE

Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Using Biological Mesh With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04033484
Enrollment
66
Registered
2019-07-26
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perineal Wound Complications After ELAPE

Keywords

extralevator abdominoperineal excision, Perineal wound healing, negative pressure wound therapy, biological mesh

Brief summary

Perineal wound healing is a significant challenge after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) due to a high rate of wound breakdown. And it was proved that neoadjuvant radiotherapy significantly increases perineal wound problems after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Negative pressure therapy has proven benefits in open wounds, and recently a negative pressure system has been developed for use on closed wounds at high risk of breakdown. A systematic review suggested a significant decrease in perineal wound complications when using incisional negative pressure wound therapy was demonstrated, with surgical site infection rates as low as 9% (vs 41% in control groups). The review suggested that incisional negative pressure wound therapy decreases perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection. Prospective study also suggested that after ELAPE the application of a negative pressure system to the perineal wound closed with biologic mesh may reduce perineal wound complications. The aim of the present study was to determine whether negative pressure therapy combined with biological mesh compared with biological mesh alone after ELAPE could improve wound healing.

Interventions

PROCEDURENegative Pressure Wound Therapy

The perineal wound was reconstructed with biologic mesh after ELAPE. The subcutaneous adipose layer was closed with 2/0 vicryl sutures, and a suction drain was left in the deep layer. The subcuticular layer and skin were closed with 3/0 vicryl mattress sutures and the negative pressure system applied at 80 mmHg

Sponsors

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Rectal cancer within 4 cm of the anal verge 2. T3 or T4, as determined by pre-operative MRI examination; patient did receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 3. Absence of distant metastases 4. Absence of intestinal obstruction

Exclusion criteria

1. T1-T2, as determined by pre-operative MRI before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 2. Distant metastases 3. Intestinal obstruction 4. Pregnancy or lactating 5. Contraindications to surgery 6. A mental disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
perineal wound complications6 months after operationperineal wound complications after pelvic floor reconstruction following ELAPE

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJia Gang Han, MD
hjg211@163.com+86013522867841

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026