Skip to content

Pressure Gradient for Venous Return in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

The Pressure Gradient for Venous Return (PVR) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04030221
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-23
Start date
2019-07-20
Completion date
2019-08-20
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fluid Responsiveness

Keywords

the pressure gradient for venous return, fluid responsiveness

Brief summary

Surgical patients, especially those with insufficient blood volume and hypotension, often need fluid therapy. However, there is still a lack of simple and reliable indicators for judging transfusion responsiveness in some types of surgery. Previous studies have shown that Pressure Gradient for Venous Return (PVR) can be used to guide infusion. Thus, our aim is to explore the relationship between PVR and liquid reactivity.

Detailed description

Fluid resuscitation is one of the key issues in the management of surgery and anesthesia. Fluid infusion test is a method to determine patients' reactivity to liquid therapy. The commonly used Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) and Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) are good predictors of fluid responsiveness, but they are not suitable for operations with increased intra-abdominal pressure, such as laparoscopy surgery. Some studies have shown that Pressure Gradient for Venous Return (PVR) may has the same effect as PPV/SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR). In the case that PPV/SVV cannot be used, PVR may be used alternatively. Therefore, our aim is to explore the relationship between the changes of PVR and fluid responsiveness during liquid infusion and to determine relevant parameters. We will choose patients planed to receive laparoscopic surgery and general anesthesia, especially the patients with gastrointestinal tumors because of generally long operation time and much infusion volume. In our hospital, these patients will routinely indwelled arterial catheters and deep venous catheters during the operation. The former is mainly used to monitor direct arterial pressure, and the latter is used for fluid infusion.Through the above two pathways, we can collect the hemodynamic parameters of patients, and then establish the relationship between PVR and FR. In our study, a good FR was defined as a 10% increase in cardiac index (CI) after fluid infusion, and PVR is calculated by a special formula based on some specific parameters of hemodynamics.

Interventions

250 ml of liquid will be given within 10 minutes for each patients, and the hemodynamic parameters before and after fluid infusion will be recorded. Then the experiment is completed.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* cardiac insufficiency; severe arrhythmias; patients using intra-aortic balloon pump; use of left ventricular assist devices; spasm of peripheral arteries caused by some factor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hemodynamic parametersAt enrollmentdirect arterial pressure including systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure; central venous pressure.These data are collected continuously and dynamically.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYan Min, Doctor
zryanmin@ziu.edu.cn+86-13757118632

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026