Skip to content

Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound

Imagio® Pivotal Multi-Reader, Multi-Case Study of Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound to Guide Decision to Biopsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04030104
Acronym
Reader-02
Enrollment
480
Registered
2019-07-23
Start date
2019-07-30
Completion date
2019-11-03
Last updated
2021-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The Imagio® Pivotal Study is intended to evaluate if the results observed in the previous Feasibility Study can be confirmed for pre-specified effectiveness endpoints. Using Intention-to-Diagnose (ITD) masses from the PIONEER Pivotal study, 480 to 840 masses are to be used for the Pivotal Study, the remaining masses will be reserved for training the SenoGram® model.

Detailed description

This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study (NCT01943916) or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study (NCT03708393) are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study. Imagio® \[Ultrasound (IUS) + Optoacoustic (OA)\] (IUS)(IUS+OA) training will be completed prior to any reads taking place. Read 1 will be immediately followed by Read 2 within the same read session.

Interventions

DEVICEReader Study - Imagio Ultrasound

Imagio ultrasound images to be reviewed as part of Reader study

DEVICEReader Study Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic Imaging

Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic images to be reviewed as part of Reader study

DEVICEMammography

Mammography as available per standard of care

Sponsors

Seno Medical Instruments Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Readers will not be provided with information regarding the initial patient diagnosis

Intervention model description

This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* One analyzable mass per patient: BI-RADS 3 and 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 masses as declared by clinical site investigator via PIONEER study inclusion criteria and categorized as BIRADS 3, 4a, 4b 4c and 5 by conventional diagnostic ultrasound (CDU) * Masses declared to be in the PIONEER Intention to Diagnose (ITD)/analysis population, including high risk cases per original PIONEER protocol * Patient age, indication for study entry and available medical history * Evaluable mammograms and OA and IUS video loops and stills for each mass

Exclusion criteria

* Critical missing IUS or OA still image and/or video loop views or incorrect IUS or OA stills and video loops that would preclude a case from being evaluated by readers * Reader-02 Proficiency Test and training cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-upPrimary effectiveness endpoint was the difference (gain) in specificity (fSp) at fixed 98% sensitivity for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). fSp derived from empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using endpoint interpolation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-upNLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). NLR = \[(1-sensitivity) / specificity\].
Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-upPLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). PLR = \[sensitivity / (1-specificity)\].
Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-uppAUC considers only the region of the area under the ROC curve that corresponds to clinically relevant values of sensitivity, defined as 95% to 100%, for Imagio IUS+OA vs. IUS alone, averaged across 15 readers. Both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). A higher pAUC indicates better diagnostic accuracy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

New Independent Reader Study (new readers re-reading a sub-set of randomly selected images acquired during PIONEER-01 Study- (NCT01943916)). Reader-02 study execution dates: 30 Jul 2019 to 3 Nov 2019

Pre-assignment details

Imagio Ultrasound (IUS) and Imagio optoacoustic/ultrasound (IUS+OA) images of breast masses previously acquired from the PIONEER-01 study (NCT01943916) referenced above were used for this study. Reader-02 was a single-arm sequentially read multi reader/case (MRMC) study comparing IUS vs Imagio (IUS+OA). New readers were recruited-NO new subjects/masses. Results were based on biopsy diagnosis or truth panel decision as ground truth obtained during PIONEER-01.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
Each subject had one mass that was read by all readers. Each subject served as her own control, with imaging of each mass by both IUS and IUS+OA modalities. Therefore, baseline data derived from PIONEER-01 for sub set of 480 cases read during Reader-02 Study.
480
Total480

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
Age, Continuous49.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
387 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Mass Diagnosis
Subjects (Benign+TPB+HR)
300 Participants
Mass Diagnosis
Subjects (Cancer)
180 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
54 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
389 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
480 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
480 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 480
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 480

Outcome results

Primary

Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)

Primary effectiveness endpoint was the difference (gain) in specificity (fSp) at fixed 98% sensitivity for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). fSp derived from empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using endpoint interpolation.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Population: Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
IUS AloneGain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)38.22 % benign+TPB masses correctly identified
Imagio (IUS+OA)Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)47.20 % benign+TPB masses correctly identified
p-value: 0.0268Random Reader, Random Mass
Secondary

Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)

NLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). NLR = \[(1-sensitivity) / specificity\].

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Population: Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
IUS AloneNegative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)0.053 Ratio
Imagio (IUS+OA)Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)0.047 Ratio
Secondary

Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)

pAUC considers only the region of the area under the ROC curve that corresponds to clinically relevant values of sensitivity, defined as 95% to 100%, for Imagio IUS+OA vs. IUS alone, averaged across 15 readers. Both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). A higher pAUC indicates better diagnostic accuracy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Population: Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
IUS AlonePartial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)0.0205 Percentage of Probability
Imagio (IUS+OA)Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)0.0244 Percentage of Probability
Secondary

Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)

PLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). PLR = \[sensitivity / (1-specificity)\].

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

Population: Total population of subjects/masses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
IUS AlonePositive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)1.548 Ratio
Imagio (IUS+OA)Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)1.959 Ratio

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026