Skip to content

Psychological Determinants of the Therapeutic Observance of Osteoporotic Patients

Psychological déterminants of the Therapeutic Observance of Osteoporotic Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04029870
Acronym
OSTEOPSY
Enrollment
152
Registered
2019-07-23
Start date
2019-06-17
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2023-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Keywords

Osteoporosis, adherence to therapy, psychological determinants, self regulation model

Brief summary

Osteoporosis is a skeletal pathology characterized by decreased bone mass and deterioration of bone tissue. This pathology affects predominantly women, which is estimated that 40% of them will suffer an osteoporotic fracture. The incidence of osteoporosis, thus representing a major public health problem where osteoporotic fractures have a higher incidence than those combined with cardiovascular disease and breast cancer (INSERM, 2016; WHO 2008). It causes traumatic fractures that have the effect of dependence and loss of functional autonomy associated, in terms, with the risk of a reduction in life expectancy. The management of osteoporosis therefore becomes an issue for rheumatologists. The latter involves both compliance with hygienic-Dietetic measures (such as calcium intake, physical activities, prevention of falls...) and medicated treatments whose action is intended, for some, to block bone destruction or, for others to stimulate bone formation. The efficacy of drug treatments is now proven, these treatments are however profitable only if the therapeutic adherence of the patients is maximal. However, rheumatologists and researchers generally find an average rate of 70% enrolment after 6 months of treatment, most often lowered to 50% after 12 months of treatment, thus increasing fractures. On the other hand, the literature informs the medical and educational aspects of the problem of non-observance in osteoporotic patients, but curiously, it does not say anything of the psychological aspects likely to be linked to these behaviors of non-adherence to therapy. The objective of this thesis work is to take an interest in the underlying psychological determinants that may explain the behaviour of adherence and/or non-adherence of osteoporotic patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be treated with an anti-osteoporotic drug for at least three months * Mastering the French language orally and in writing * Have obtained the patient's oral agreement to participate in the research * Present post-menopausal osteoporosis * Present a densitometric osteoporosis with a T-score (-2.5) treated medically per OS (example: biphosphonates) or by subcutaneous injection (example: prolia) * Present a history of severe osteoporotic fractures after falls of its height.

Exclusion criteria

* Present a psychiatric history * Present an intellectual disability * Present major cognitive disorders related to neurodegenerative disease or other nervous system disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to therapyDay 1The influence of psychological emission on the therapeutic adherence is measured with an adherence scale (EGOMAC) which includes 3 items: drugs observance, hygiene compliance and dietary restrictions. The item are scored on a 4-point scale with 1-strongly disagree; 2-disagree, 3-agree and 4-fully agree.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to therapyYear 1The influence of psychological emission on the therapeutic adherence is measured with an adherence scale (EGOMAC) which includes 3 items: drugs observance, hygiene compliance and dietary restrictions. The item are scored on a 4-point scale with 1-strongly disagree; 2-disagree, 3-agree and 4-fully agree.
Perception of diseaseday 1with the validated Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire.The Brief IPQ has nine items rated on a scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). The first five assess cognitive perceptions such as effect on life; duration of illness control over illness; beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment, and experience of symptoms. Items 6 and 8 assess emotional aspects to include concern about illness and a multifaceted question about mood. Item 7 assesses degree of understanding of the illness. The final item is open-ended asking respondent to rank the 3 most impotant factors causing their illness.
Perception of treatmentday 1Wit the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire which comprises 18 items which assesses medication beliefs in general and in specific conditions allowing for the investigation of the overall perceptions of medication in general as well as perceptions of medication in their chronic disease. The item are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with scores ranging from 4 to 20.
Anxietyday 1Anxiety is measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale composed of 14 items, seven items for the anxiety subscale and seven for the depression subscale. Each item is scored on a response-scale with four alternatives ranging between 0 and 3. For both subscale, score of less than 7 indicates non-cases; between 8 and 10: mild; between 11 and 14: moderate and between 15 and 21: severe.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026