Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement

Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04029324
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-07-23
Start date
2019-07-15
Completion date
2022-10-01
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Diseases, Tooth Fractures

Brief summary

Immediate implant placement (IIP) has been an attractive treatment concept for both patients and clinicians due to reduced surgical interventions and total treatment span. Although soft-tissue alterations or midfacial recession have been demonstrated in previous studies, recent studies have reported positive result following IIP with the modification of surgical interventions. However, high-quality evidence (≥Ib: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial) on comparing the clinical outcome of IIP with early implant placement (type 2) is limited.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtooth extraction

Under local anesthesia, tooth will be extracted atraumatically.

PROCEDUREImplant placement

Dental implants will be placed according to the instructions in fresh sockets or alveolar ridge.

PROCEDUREBone augmentation

Bone substitute will be used to augment or maintain the bone contour.

PROCEDURECoronally repositioned flap

After periosteal releasing incision, mucoperiosteal flap will be sutured at a more coronally position

Sponsors

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age ≧18 years * single hopeless teeth in anterior maxilla * enough apical bone volume to achieve primary stability (\>4mm)

Exclusion criteria

* active periodontoal infection * incomplete buccal bone plate * unwilling to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Midfacial recession1-year follow-upRecession of midfacial gingival level before extraction and 1-year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding on probing %T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-upBleeding on probing % between crown delivery and 1-year follow-up
Pink esthetic scoreT2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-up
Probing depthT2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-upProbing depth between crown delivery and 1-year follow-up
Papillae recession1-year follow-upRecession of papillae before extraction and 1-year follow-up
marginal bone loss1-year follow-upmarginal bone level between crown delivery and 1-year follow-up
Visual Analogue Scale assessementT1: immediately after surgery,T2:crown delivery, T3: 1-year follow-upVisual Analogue Scale on post-operative pain, esthetics and function

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJunyu Shi, Phd
sakyamuni_jin@163.com8653315299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026