Emphysema or COPD
Conditions
Brief summary
Rationale: The bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using vapor was found to be effective and the treatment has an acceptable safety profile. The results of this trial has led to the inclusion of this treatment in the COPD GOLD guidelines in 2019. In the Netherlands the treatment has not been performed so far but the treatment device has been made available to the UMCG hospital to perform emphysema treatments. Some of the patients refered to the UMCG could benefit from the Vapor treatment and therefore with this treatment we will be able to treat patients who have no other treatment options left. Objective: The overall aim of this study is to gain experience with the Thermal Vapor treatment by investigating the safety and efficacy of the treatment. Primary Objective: The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function (measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment. Study designThis study will be a prospective observational, single center study. All patients that undergo the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using thermal Vapor will be asked if their data can be captured in the database. Study population: Patients with severe COPD who undergo the Thermal Vapor treatment.
Detailed description
Rationale: The STEP-UP trial investigated the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using vapor and showed that the treatment group significantly improved after 6 months compared to the control group in Lung function and quality of life. The authors also concluded that the treatment has an acceptable safety profile. The results of this trial has led to the inclusion of this treatment in the COPD GOLD guidelines in 2019. In the Netherlands the treatment has not been performed so far but the treatment device has been made available to the UMCG hospital to perform emphysema treatments. Yearly, approximately 600 severe emphysema patients are refered to the UMCG for a bronchoscopic treatment but only approximately 10% is suitable for a treatment with endobronchial valves or coils. Some of the other patients could benefit from the Vapor treatment and therefore with this treatment we will be able to treat patients who have no other treatment options left. Objective: The overall aim of this study is to gain experience with the Thermal Vapor treatment by investigating the safety and efficacy of the treatment. Primary Objective: The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function (measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment. Secondary Objectives: Safety • A secondary objective is to investigate the safety of the Thermal Vapor treatment by recoding all the adverse events that occur between baseline and 1 year follow up after treatment. Efficacy • A secondary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function, lung hyperinflation, quality of life, dyspnea, CT parameters and exercise capacity between baseline and 6 and 12 months follow up after treatment. Longterm • A secondary objective is to investigate the long term effect of the treatment in terms of change in Lung function, lung hyperinflation, quality of life and exercise capacity between baseline and up to 5 years follow up after treatment. Study designThis study will be a prospective observational, single center study that will investigate the safety and efficacy of the InterVapor (Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation System) that will be introduced in the Netherlands for the first time. All patients that undergo the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using thermal Vapor will be asked if their data can be captured in the database. Study population: Patients with severe COPD who undergo the Thermal Vapor treatment. Main study parameters: The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function which will be measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment.
Interventions
OTHERNA: intervention is not part of the study
NA: it is not an interventional study
Sponsors
University Medical Center Groningen
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of COPD 2. FEV1%pred \<45% and FVC\<70%pred, 3. Severe lung hyperinflation: RV\>175%pred and RV/TLC\>55% 4. Patients will have heterogeneous emphysema, as evidenced by high-resolution CT demonstrating a heterogeneity Index \>1.2 in at least one segment to be treated. 5. Nonsmoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study 6. Completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing. 7. Read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
Exclusion criteria
1. FEV1 \< 15% predicted 2. Inability to walk \>140 meters in 6 minutes (6MWD) following optimized medical management 3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 or more hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrolment. 4. Highly diseased lower lobes (tissue to air ratio of \<11%) 5. Presence of single large bulla (defined as \> 1/3 volume of lobe) or a paraseptal distribution of emphysema in the treated lobe 6. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure \>45 mm Hg via echocardiogram. 7. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by: PaCO2 \>8.0 kPa and/or PaO2 \< 6.0 kPa (on room air). 8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under conscious sedation or general anaesthesia. 9. Subject is taking \>5 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lung function | Between baseline and 6 months follow up | Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety by number of adverse events | Between baseline and 1 year follow up | Number of all adverse events |
| Lung function | Between baseline and 1 year follow up | Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second |
| Hyperinflation | Between baseline and 6 months follow up | Change in Residual Volume |
| Quality of life measured by a questionnaire | Between baseline and 6 months follow up | Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (range 0-100, highest indicated worsed quality of life) |
| Exercise capacity | Between baseline and 6 months follow up | Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) |
Outcome results
None listed