Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Heart Failure
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this proposal is to compare clinical outcomes, implementation metrics (i.e., patient reach and clinician adoption), and clinician preferences of two designs (customized vs. commercial) of a clinical decision support (CDS). Beta blocker prescribing for patients with heart failure will be used as a test case. The best practices in CDS design, including the user-centered design will be incorporated into the customized CDS and compared to a commercially-available CDS in the electronic health record using a cluster randomized trial.
Interventions
Active computerized clinical decision support alert within the electronic health record that recommends initiation of an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Study subjects are providers Inclusion Criteria: * Prescribing primary care clinicians at University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) who provide care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in prescription of Beta blocker (BB) | 6 months post CDS implementation | Number of prescriptions of an evidence based BB during a primary care office visit. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Reach | 6 months post CDS implementation | The proportion of unique patients with heart failure who were seen by primary care and not taking an evidence based BB who the CDS fired for. |
| Clinician Adoption | 6 months post CDS implementation | The proportion of CDS who were not outright dismissed by the clinician. |
| Factors Influencing Clinician Adoption of the CDS per Qualitative Interviews | 6 months post CDS implementation | Clinician-reported factors that influence adoption of the CDS. |
Countries
United States