Skip to content

NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: A PILOT STUDY

Pilot Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback Training in the Improvement of Cognitive Functions of the Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04027725
Acronym
NEUROFEEDEL
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-07-22
Start date
2019-07-16
Completion date
2019-07-16
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Mild cognitive Impairment, Neurofeedback, Electroencephalography, Memory, Attention

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of SMR neurofeedback training on cognitive performance and electrical brain activity in elderly with cognitive impairment.

Detailed description

Older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are at high risk to progress to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Slowing down effect of dementia by enhancing brain plasticity represents on of the most prominent challenges. Neurofeedback is one of the promising techniques that showed therapeutic efficacy and cognitive improvement in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, epilepsy, stroke. The investigators aim to study the effects of a sensorimotor neurofeedback training protocol (SMR) on cognitive performances in elderly and to assess whether MCI patients change in brain electrical activity after training.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNeurofeedback

Neurofeedback experiment will consist of 20 sessions of neurofeedback training, twice or three times a week during seven weeks. Each session will last for 40 minutes. The experimental group will undergo questionnaires, EEG recording and neuropsychological assessments in three-time points, pre-training (T0), post-trianing (T1) and 1 month follow-up (T2). Electroencephalography will be recorded by a technician in EEG for each participant, EEG power spectrum will be calculated in pre (T0) and post neurofeedback training/psycho-pedagogical care at T1 and T2.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, educational level of 9 years of studies minimum, righthandedness, subjective memory complaint confirmed by an informant, a mini mental Status Examination score \> 20, preserve activity of daily living and absence of dementia.

Exclusion criteria

Elderly persons who were under guardianship, resident in nursing facilities, neurological disease, psychiatric disease and involved in another cognitive intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning testBaseline assessment in 2 weeks period before intervention, change from baseline at immediately after the end of the intervention , and after 1-month follow-upAssessment of Verbal learning in episodic memory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
relative power for delta, theta, alpha, sensorimotor and lower beta frequency bands.assessment at baseline, change from baseline to immediately after the NF training and 1 month follow-upDescription : Electroencephalography was recorded and EEG power spectrum was calculated using the fast Fourier Transform. The power spectral density was calculated to extract the relative power for each frequency band and estimated as a log-ratio.

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnne-Sophie RIGAUD, Professor

APHP

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026