Skip to content

Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

IMPAACT 2016 - Evaluating a Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04024488
Enrollment
484
Registered
2019-07-18
Start date
2024-04-06
Completion date
2025-06-05
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1-infection

Keywords

Mental Health, Adherence, Trauma-Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Brief summary

IMPAACT 2016 was a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The intervention was adapted to the local context through advance conduct of focus groups and pilot testing.

Detailed description

IMPAACT 2016 was a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The trial was preceded by an adaption of the TI-CBT Intervention at each site using the "ADAPT-ITT" model, which included focus groups and pilot tests. Participant-level data was not collected during the focus group phase, and the pilot phase consent form specified that collected data would not be analyzed. Per protocol, only data from the randomized trial were analyzed. The study was closed early due to the funding constraints. In the randomized study, youth were individually randomized to either the TI-CBT Intervention arm or the Discussion Control arm. Youth participants met as a group within their randomized arm and received multiple group sessions within an 8-week period. Each arm featured 15 groups with an average of 8.5 youth per group, or a total of 254 youth in the Randomized Trial. TI-CBT Intervention and Discussion Control groups could be mixed-gender, which required at least two participants of each gender. Caregivers (with consent and youth permission) were assigned to the same study arm as their youth. Caregiver participants met as a group within their arm for two caregiver-specific sessions on two separate weeks, separate from their youth's group sessions. Each arm featured 15 groups with an average of 7.7 caregivers per group, or a total of 230 caregivers in the Randomized Trial. Youth and caregivers completed a follow-up assessment immediately after their last group session and two additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months. Youth and caregivers received 1 two-hour booster group session consistent with their assigned study arm immediately after the 6-month assessments. The booster sessions were intended to enhance treatment effects and increase sustainability. Following completion of 6-month assessments (primary timepoint), data were analyzed to determine the short-term effects of the interventions. Additional analyses to assess long-term effects of the interventions, including the effects of the booster group session, will be performed after the completion of 12-month assessments. Results are reported for youth participants in the randomized trial only, because limited sociodemographic characteristics and no primary or secondary outcome measures were collected for caregivers. As specified in the protocol and statistical analysis plan, primary outcomes were analyzed with groups as the analytic units due to the presence of intracluster correlation among participants in the same group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALYouth TI-CBT Intervention Arm

For youth, each TI-CBT group session was led by IYL. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches youth strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Youth Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.

BEHAVIORALYouth Discussion Control Arm

For youth, each discussion group session was led by IYL. Discussion topics were selected by youth in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.

BEHAVIORALCaregiver TI-CBT Intervention Arm

For caregivers, each TI-CBT group session was led by adult study staff. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Caregiver Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.

BEHAVIORALCaregiver Discussion Control Arm

For caregivers, each discussion group session was led by adult study staff. Discussion topics were selected by caregivers in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.

Sponsors

International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In the Randomized Trial, youth participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two study arms: TI-CBT Intervention or Discussion Control. Participating caregivers were assigned to the same arm as their youth. For youth, the TI-CBT Intervention arm consisted of six 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions led by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6 months. The caregivers of youth who were enrolled in the TI-CBT Intervention arm received two 2-hour group sessions led by adult study staff during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6 months. The Youth Discussion Control arm consisted of six 2-hour discussion group sessions led by IYL during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months. The caregivers of youth randomized to the Discussion Control arm had two 2-hour discussion group sessions led by adult study staff during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- For Youth Participants: * If of legal age to provide independent informed consent as determined by site Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and consistent with site IRB/EC policies and procedures: potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation. * If not of legal age to provide independent informed consent: Parent or guardian is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation and potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed assent for study participation. * Confirmed HIV-infection based on documented testing of two samples collected at different time points as documented in medical records or by confirmatory testing. * Age limit 15-19 years * At screening, aware of his or her HIV infection, as confirmed by Investigator of Record or designee. * At screening, has been prescribed ART for a minimum of 24 weeks prior to screening based on medical record documentation. * At screening, meets at least one of the following indicators of moderate to severe mental health symptomology: * Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10 * General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score ≥ 10 * UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) score \>= 35 Inclusion Criteria - For Caregiver Participants: * Caregiver, defined as a biological parent, legal guardian, or person who provides emotional, psychological and/or informational care to a youth taking part in the Randomized Trial, as identified by the youth, and for whom the youth has provided written permission to participate in the study. * Of legal age to provide independent consent and willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

- For Youth Participants: * At entry, participating in a study delivering a mental health or ART adherence intervention. * Prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test * Any other condition, adverse social situation or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would preclude informed assent and informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsAverage (standard deviation) of the group-level mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score within arm. The GAD-7 features 7 items assessing frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 7 items are summed to obtain a GAD-7 score ranging from 0 (least) to 21 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe anxiety symptoms.
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA-PTSD-RI) at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsAverage (standard deviation) of the group-level mean UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) score within arm. The UCLA PTSD-RI assesses DSM-IV criteria for PTSD in youth. If prior trauma is endorsed, assessment asks whether 31 PTSD symptoms have occurred within the past month on a scale from 0="None" to 4="Most of the time". A scoring algorithm is applied to the 31 items to calculate a score ranging from 0 (least) to 80 (most severe symptoms). A score of 35 or more indicates moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. If no trauma is endorsed, no score is calculated.
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsAverage (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Composite score within arm. Composite scores are a study-specific measure of combined mental health symptoms. A participant's PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores at the given timepoint are each standardized according to baseline to get Z scores. The 3 Z scores are summed to obtain a Composite score. Composite scores are not Z scores themselves and can range from -Inf to +Inf, with greater scores reflecting more severe symptoms overall. Composite scores of 0 at baseline represent average symptom levels overall, but otherwise do not have a meaningful central value.
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsAverage (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score within arm. The PHQ-9 features 9 items assessing the frequency of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 9 items are summed to obtain a PHQ-9 score ranging from 0 (least) to 27 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe depression symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score within arm. The GAD-7 features 7 items assessing frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 7 items are summed to obtain a GAD-7 score ranging from 0 (least) to 21 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe anxiety symptoms.
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at IPL (Immediately Post Last Group Session)After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score within arm. The PHQ-9 features 9 items assessing the frequency of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 9 items are summed to obtain a PHQ-9 score ranging from 0 (least) to 27 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe depression symptoms.
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) score within arm. The UCLA PTSD-RI assesses DSM-IV criteria for PTSD in youth. If prior trauma is endorsed, assessment asks whether 31 PTSD symptoms have occurred within the past month on a scale from 0="None" to 4="Most of the time". A scoring algorithm is applied to the 31 items to calculate a score ranging from 0 (least) to 80 (most severe symptoms). A score of 35 or more indicates moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. If no trauma is endorsed, no score is calculated.
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Composite score within arm. Composite scores are a study-specific measure of combined mental health symptoms. A participant's PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores at the given timepoint are each standardized according to baseline to get Z scores. The 3 Z scores are summed to obtain a Composite score. Composite scores are not Z scores themselves and can range from -Inf to +Inf, with greater scores reflecting more severe symptoms overall. Composite scores of 0 at baseline represent average symptom levels overall, but otherwise do not have a meaningful central value.
Group-level Mean ART Adherence at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsAverage (standard deviation) of the group-level mean antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence score within arm. The Wilson 3-Item Adherence Scale assessed self-reported ART adherence. Within the past 30 days, the 3 items correspond to missed daily doses (0-30), adherence to medication instructions ("Very poor" to "Excellent"), and frequency of perfect use ("Never" to "Always"). Responses on the three items are transformed linearly to scores between 0 and 100 points and averaged to obtain a single score. Scores range from 0 (worst) possible adherence to 100 (best possible adherence).
Viral Load at 6 Monthsat 6 monthsHIV-1 RNA
Group-level Mean ART Adherence at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session).After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks).Self-report - Wilson 3-item scale (range 0-100, higher=better)
Viral Load at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)HIV-1 RNA

Countries

Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Zimbabwe

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRDorothy Dow, MD, MSc

Duke University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Accrual occurred between April 2024 and October 2024 in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe at 8 different sites. The first participant was enrolled on 6 April 2024 and the trial closed to accrual on 7 October 2024.

Pre-assignment details

No data for focus groups or pilot tests is reported because participant data was not collected by focus groups and the pilot consent form stated that collected data would not be analyzed. The data reported for all group-level measures reflect an aggregate of the 15 groups in each arm, instead of the individual participants in each arm.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous41.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
ART adherence score74.9 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3
Composite score-0.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Enrolled in school20 Participants
GAD-7 score9.8 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Group-level mean age17.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Group-level mean ART adherence score76.4 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Group-level mean Composite score0.1 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Group-level mean GAD-7 score9.9 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Group-level mean HIV stigma score15.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Group-level mean PHQ-9 score12.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Group-level mean UCLA PTSD-RI score41.1 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Group-level percentage of female participants56 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Group-level percentage of participants enrolled in school14.5 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Group-level percentage of participants virally suppressed (<200 copies/mL)87.8 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Group-level percentage of participants with some secondary education64.4 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6
Group-level percentage of participants working outside home15 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Highest level of education attained
Some primary
155 Participants
Highest level of education attained
Some secondary
75 Participants
Highest level of education attained
University
15 Participants
Highest level of education attained
Vocational
3 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
>=10,000
8 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
1,000 to <10,000
11 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
200 to <1,000
2 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
<40
217 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
40 to <200
3 Participants
HIV stigma score7.7 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Housing with electricity159 Participants
Housing with pipe water80 Participants
Owns a cellphone147 Participants
PHQ-9 score12.1 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
126 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Botswana
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malawi
125 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Zimbabwe
59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants
UCLA PTSD-RI score40.3 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
Virally suppressed (< 200 copies/mL)110 Participants
Working outside of home18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1280 / 126
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 1281 / 126
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1281 / 126

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026