Skip to content

Comparing the Visual Outcome, Visual Quality, and Satisfaction Among Three Types of Multi-focal Intraocular Lenses

Comparing the Visual Outcome, Visual Quality, and Satisfaction Among Three Types of Multi-focal Intraocular Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04019691
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-07-15
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2022-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Keywords

multifocal intraocular lens

Brief summary

The investigators are going to Investigate the comparative efficacy of the patients who underwent cataract surgery with three different multifocal IOLs.

Detailed description

Going to analyze the clinical results of 60 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery and multifocal IOL implantation. The patients were divided into the following three groups: Mix-and-Match, EDOF, and Trifocal. The clinical assessments included uncorrected near, intermediate, distance and best corrected distance visual acuity, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and reading speed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by questionnaire. All outcomes were compared among the three groups.

Interventions

DEVICETrifocal

Phacoemulsification and implantation of FineVision PodFT IOLs (PhysIOL SA) in both eyes.

DEVICEMix-and-Match

Phacoemulsification and implantation of Tecnis ZKB00 multifocal IOL with +2.75 D add power (Abbott Medical Optic Inc., Santa Ana, CA) in the dominant eye, and a Tecnis ZLB00 multifocal IOL with +3.25 D add power (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.) in the non-dominant eye.

DEVICEEDOF

Phacoemulsification and implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 trifocal IOLs (Abbot Medical Optics Inc.) in both eyes.

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral senile cataracts and the desire to be spectacle-free for all distances

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 21 years, had corneal astigmatism \>1.00 D, previous ocular surgery or trauma, or ocular disease other than cataracts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative uncorrected near, intermediate, and far visual acuity.At 1month and 3months after surgerylogMAR
Postoperative contrast sensitivity in the three groups.Postoperative 3 months3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree using a CSV-1000 chart (Vector Vision, reenville, OH) under photopic (85 cd/m2), mesopic (\ 3 cd/m2), and mesopic with glare conditions
Postoperative satisfaction questionnaire.Postoperative 3 monthspatients were shown images and asked to rate the frequency, degree, and discomfort related to the visual artifacts as none, minimal, moderate, or severe (0, 1, 2, or 3 points for the respective levels). The mean score was calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative refractive outcomePostoperative 3 monthsDiopter

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026