Skip to content

Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens Study

Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04017572
Acronym
OptiStAR
Enrollment
21
Registered
2019-07-12
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2021-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis, End Stage Kidney Disease

Keywords

dialysis, peritoneal dialysis

Brief summary

This clinical study is designed to evaluate the theoretical prediction of a lower glucose absorption in optimized automated peritoneal dialysis regimes. Patients will receive both a standard 6 x 2L 1.36% glucose regime or an optimized 7 x 2 L 2.27% glucose + 5 x 2 L 0.1% glucose regime in a crossover fashion.

Detailed description

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is a rapidly growing, home-based kidney replacement therapy promoting patient autonomy, and is associated with lower societal costs compared to hemodialysis. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on PD, the unwanted glucose absorption during APD is problematic. Recent results (Öberg CM, Rippe B, 2017, see references), using a theoretical model of APD, indicate that large reductions in glucose absorption are possible by using specialized so-called optimized bi-modal treatment regimes having UF cycles using a higher glucose concentration (e.g. 2.27% glucose) and Clearance cycles using a low glucose concentration (e.g. 0.1% glucose).

Interventions

PROCEDUREAutomated peritoneal dialysis (APD)

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) using the Baxter HomeChoice Pro Cycler.

Sponsors

Universidad de Córdoba
CollaboratorOTHER
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Lund University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 18 and 75 years; * duration of PD (automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)) \>4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional Classification; NYHA III or IV); * pregnancy; * catheter malfunction or * peritonitis within 3 months prior to the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glucose absorptionThrough study completion, up to 1 yearAmount of glucose absorbed across the peritoneal membrane during the treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UltrafiltrationThrough study completion, up to 1 yearAmount of water transported from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity during the treatment
Creatinine clearanceThrough study completion, up to 1 yearAmount of creatinine transported from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity during the treatment
Urea clearanceThrough study completion, up to 1 yearAmount of urea transported from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity during the treatment
Sodium removalThrough study completion, up to 1 yearAmount of sodium transported from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity during the treatment
Incidence of complicationsUp to 14 days post-interventionComplications that are or can be suspected to be related to the study intervention

Countries

Argentina

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026