Skip to content

The Efficacy of Interferential Current Treatment on Knee Osteoarthritis

The Efficacy of Interferential Current Treatment on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Double Blind Study That Compares the Effects of Different Carrier Frequencies

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04015323
Enrollment
61
Registered
2019-07-10
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2019-12-01
Last updated
2020-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

interferential current, knee osteoarthritis, pain

Brief summary

The effects of different carrier frequencies of interferential current on pain and function in patients with knee arthrosis will be compared

Detailed description

60 patients with knee osteoarhthritis will be enrolled in the study. Subjects will be randomized to 3 groups. All patients will receive interferential currents to both their knees, with different carrier frequencies (2, 4 and 8 kilohertz (kHz) respectively). The effect of different types of carrier frequencies on pain, 10 meter walk test will be analysed.

Interventions

An electrotherapy current with different carrier frequencies

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 50-80 years * Knee VAS pain scores ≥ 4 * Kellgren-Lawrence radiologic scores 2 and 3

Exclusion criteria

* History of knee surgery * Inflammatory arthritis * Paralysis of lower extremities * Serious cardiovascular disease /presence of cardiac pacemaker * Severe osteoarhthritis of lower extremity joints other than the knees * History of newly diagnosed cancer (ın the last 6 months) * Cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain scores according to visual analog scale (VAS)At baseline, on the 3rd week visit (last day of interference therapy) and on the 7th week visitA visual analog scale value between 0-10. 0 meaning lack of pain and 10 meaning the worst pain the patient has experienced.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in functional status levels according to Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arhtiritis Incex (WOMAC) scaleAt baseline, on the 3rd week visit (last day of interference therapy) and on the 7th week visitWomac scale is a questionnaire assessing patients' level of pain and functional status. Scores. Scores range from 0 to 96, 0 representing best and 96 representing worst scores. Pain, stiffness and functional limitation subscores are added up to obtain a total WOMAC score.
Change in pain status levels according to Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arhtiritis Incex (WOMAC) scaleAt baseline, on the 3rd week visit (last day of interference therapy) and on the 7th week visitWomac scale is a questionnaire assessing patients' level of pain and functional status. Scores. Scores range from 0 to 96, 0 representing best and 96 representing worst scores. Pain, stiffness and functional limitation subscores are added up to obtain a total WOMAC score.
Change in 10 meter walking test scoreAt baseline, on the 3rd week visit (last day of interference therapy) and on the 7th week visitThis test is a measure that is used to assess walking speed in meters per second over 10 meters. It is used to determine functional mobility.
Change in the number of paracetamol tablets taken in a weekAt baseline, on the 3rd week visit (last day of interference therapy) and on the 7th week visitNumber of 500 mg tablets taken over one week will be written by subjects.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026