Skip to content

Management of Signs and Symptoms Associated With Dry Eye Disease

A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate PROKERA® in the Management of Signs and Symptoms Associated With Dry Eye Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04015219
Enrollment
3
Registered
2019-07-10
Start date
2018-07-18
Completion date
2020-10-05
Last updated
2022-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Brief summary

A prospective randomized, and controlled study to compare the effectiveness of PROKERA® SLIM plus standard of care (SOC) in the PROKERA® SLIM Arm to SOC alone in the Control Arm. Subjects presenting with moderate DED defined as corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 3 points out of 9 will be recruited.

Interventions

DEVICESelf retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane

PROKERA SLIM

OTHERlifitegrast ophthalmic solution

Xiidra® (5% lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, Shire, Lexington, MA)

Sponsors

BioTissue Holdings, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with moderate dry eye defined as corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 3 * Age ≥ 18 years * Distance best corrected visual acuity better than 20/60 Snellen equivalent in each eye * Willing to sign a written informed consent to participate * Able to follow study instructions, with the intention of completing all required visits

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of persistent corneal epithelial defect or ulcer in either eye * Presence of active ocular infection in either eye * Presence of ocular inflammation that is not related to keratoconjunctivitis sicca, e.g., allergy, severe blepharitis * Presence of other corneal disorder(s) that give rise to reduced corneal sensitivity, such as recurrent herpes keratitis * Presence of corneal diseases other than dry eye that can disturb the pre-corneal tear film such as epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD) * Contact lens wear * History of recent ocular surgery/trauma, which could affect corneal sensitivity, e.g., corneal transplantation, LASIK * Presence of cicatricial ocular surface diseases * A medical or ocular condition, or a personal situation, which in the principal investigator's opinion, is not appropriate for participation in the trial * Any scheduled or planned ocular or systemic surgery or procedure during the study * Pregnancy and women who are expecting to be pregnant. * Current enrolment in another interventional drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of anticipated entry into this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal Fluorescein Staining1 monthcorneal fluorescein staining score of study eye graded from 0 to 9, with a score of 9 being worse. The corneal fluorescein staining score is the sum of three scores by subdividing the entire cornea into upper 1/3, middle 1/3, and lower 1/3, of which each is graded from 0 (no staining) to 3 (diffuse staining).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eye Dryness Score1 monthPatient subjectively evaluates eye dryness score using a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 maximal discomfort
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)1 monthPatient subjectively evaluates OSDI questionnaire, OSDI is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Arm
PROKERA SLIM + Standard of Care Self retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane: PROKERA SLIM lifitegrast ophthalmic solution: Xiidra® (5% lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, Shire, Lexington, MA)
2
Control Arm
Standard of Care lifitegrast ophthalmic solution: Xiidra® (5% lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, Shire, Lexington, MA)
1
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment ArmTotalControl Arm
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Corneal Fluorescein Staining

corneal fluorescein staining score of study eye graded from 0 to 9, with a score of 9 being worse. The corneal fluorescein staining score is the sum of three scores by subdividing the entire cornea into upper 1/3, middle 1/3, and lower 1/3, of which each is graded from 0 (no staining) to 3 (diffuse staining).

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment ArmCorneal Fluorescein Staining0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Control ArmCorneal Fluorescein Staining3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Eye Dryness Score

Patient subjectively evaluates eye dryness score using a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 maximal discomfort

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment ArmEye Dryness Score57.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46
Control ArmEye Dryness Score75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

Patient subjectively evaluates OSDI questionnaire, OSDI is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment ArmOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)64.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Control ArmOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026