Skip to content

Infant Formula With Partially Hydrolyzed Cow's Milk Protein Versus a Formula With Intact Protein

Randomized, Parallel, Double-blind Study With a Partially Hydrolyzed Infant Formula With Cow's Milk Protein vs a Formula With Intact Protein to Assess Growth and Impact on the Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Colic in the Healthy Infant.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04015089
Acronym
VEGY-UP
Enrollment
156
Registered
2019-07-10
Start date
2018-07-19
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infant Colic

Keywords

Infant formula, Partially hydrolized protein infant formula

Brief summary

Randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial, comparing a partially hydrolyzed serum proteins infant formula with a conventional formula with intact protein in healthy infants that suffer from colic

Detailed description

Demonstrate that an infant formula with partially hydrolized cow's milk protein of serum proteins is equivalent to an intact protein formula in healthy children in terms of safety of use and suitability, to prove that it can be a alternative with digestive health benefits in healthy children with infant colic.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPartially hydrolyzed formula (pHF)

Infant formula with partially hydrolyzed protein

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTStandard formula (SF)

Infant formula with intact protein

Sponsors

Laboratorios Ordesa
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Weeks to 8 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children diagnosed as nursing colic according to Roma IV criteria. * Infants who have received breastfeeding at least 2 weeks. * Infants who at the time of inclusion in the study whose parents/legal guardians voluntarily decide not to continue exclusive breastfeeding or only maintain it in residual form (less than 20% of the daily intake, one breast intake per day). * Full-term infants (\>37 weeks of gestation). * Infants with weight suitable for their gestational age (2500-4500g). * Normal APGAR score: 7-10. * Infants between 2 and 8 weeks of life. * Infants whose parents/legal guardians have signed informed consent. * Infants with good availability of clinical follow-up until the end of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Infants fed from birth with exclusive infant formula. * Infants with congenital diseases or malformations that may affect growth. * Infants with major medical conditions that require chronic medication or close medical checks. * Infants who have taken any type of antibiotics or probiotics prior to the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Growth standard calculated z-scoresFrom baseline to 3 months after starting with the formulaUsing Z-scores including: weight (g), size (cm) and cranial perimeter (cm)
Symptoms associated with infant colicFrom baseline to 3 months after starting with the formulaHours of crying, wakefulness, sleep for 24 hours, by adapting Barr's crying letter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infant illness and infection outcomesBaseline, 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visit, and 6, 9 months oldSpecific parent-reported infant symptoms (digestive, respiratory or other infections)
Behaviour/temperament test1, 6, 12 months oldInfant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised test: For this study, the very short form validated in Spanish that includes 37 items will be applied. Parents are asked to rate the frequency of specific, temperament-related behaviors observed during the last week.
Growth standard calculated z-scoresAt 6, 9 and 12 months old.Using Z-scores including: weight (g), size (cm) and cranial perimeter (cm)
Food survey at the first year of lifeAt 12 months oldInvestigator will conduct a food consumption frequency survey
Product safetyAt 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visit, and 6, 9 months oldAssessment of acceptance of the formula and record of potential adverse or side effects related to taking the product.
Assessment of supplementary foodAt 6 and 9 months oldInvestigator will collect data from the timetable for introduction of the different food groups
Gatrointestinal tolerance recordingBaseline, 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visit, and 6, 9 months oldRecord in the patient's diary stool patterns (depositional rhythm and quality of faeces)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactRoser De Castellar, MD
Roser.DeCastellar@ordesa.es+34 902105243

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026