Skip to content

Lowlands Saves Lives: A Randomized Trial Comparing CPR-quality Between Face-to-face vs. Lifesaver VR Training

Lowlands Saves Lives: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Face-to-face vs. Virtual Reality Training Using the Lifesaver VR-app on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04013633
Enrollment
381
Registered
2019-07-10
Start date
2019-08-16
Completion date
2020-08-18
Last updated
2020-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Basic life support (BLS), Virtual reality (VR), Education, Lay-person training

Brief summary

The objective of the Lowlands Saves Lives trial is to compare the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between face-to-face versus Lifesaver Virtual Reality smartphone application trained participants using a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed description

In order to optimize survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, basic life support (BLS) training of lay-person volunteers is essential. Face-to-face training has long been considered the standard, but new training-methods have emerged, of which the Lifesaver VR (developed by the UK Resuscitation Council) app seems promising. It is unknown which training method results in the highest quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Therefore, we conduct this randomized controlled trial in which subjects will be randomized to either one of the two training methods. Following the training, all participants will undergo CPR-quality testing using certified manikins and blinded assessors. The present study will be conducted during Lowlands Science, a section of the Lowlands music festival exclusively dedicated to science. Lowlands will be held on August 16-18 of 2019 and over 50.000 attendees are expected.

Interventions

OTHERLifesaver virtual reality training

CPR training using the Lifesaver virtual reality application

Short face-to-face CPR training

Sponsors

Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors are blinded for study groups

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (≥18 years). * Provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Alcohol level \>0.5‰ and not able to perform tandem gait test. * For any reason not being able to partake in the face-to-face or VR-app training (e.g. clear alcohol or drugs intoxication). * For any reason not being able to perform the CPR test on the CPR-manikin (e.g. clear alcohol or drugs intoxication).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chest compression qualityDuring post-training CPR test, performed on the same day as the trainingChest compression quality measured as depth (mm) and rate (compressions/min) measured using CPR manikin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flow fractionDuring post-training CPR test, performed on the same day as the trainingPercentage of time where compressions are given, measured using CPR manikin
CPR performance scoreDuring post-training CPR test, performed on the same day as the trainingCPR performance score from BLS-training checklist

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026