Skip to content

Connected Health to Decrease Opioid Use in Patients With Chronic Pain

Connected Health to Decrease Opioid Use in Patients With Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04013529
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-09
Start date
2018-08-31
Completion date
2020-09-15
Last updated
2021-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The objective of this pilot study to evaluate if behavioral incentives applied at the VA Medical Center can appreciably increase participation in activities that promote mobility, and subsequently reduce pain severity and opioid use.

Detailed description

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and costly condition in the US. An estimated 88.5 million adults suffer from daily pain, resulting in estimated cost of $500- 635 biJlion due to lost productivity, and $261-300 billion in health care expenditures. To manage their chronic pain, 5 to 8 million Americans take an opioid medication daily. Yet , the risks associated with ongoing opioid prescription , including overdose, abuse and diversion, temper their analgesic effects. Opioids are not more effective in the treatment of chronic pain compared with non-opioid approaches. Current guidelines have adapted to the evidence, recommending opioid-sparing approaches for treating patients with chronic pain, and tapering for those on higher doses to safer levels of use. Tapering opioids, however, requires replacing them with effective non-opioid strategies. Improving mobility has been shown to improve pain and decrease medication use among patients chronically prescribed opiates. Concurrently, financial incentives and the use of behavioral incentives have been shown to promote mobility. Appreciating the gains in health outcomes that can be made with connected health approaches, we propose a novel pilot study designed to evaluate if technology enabled care (TEC) strategies and financial incentives can improve patient mobility in our chronic pain population, reduce pain and decrease opioid use . Our primary aim is to determine if chronic pain patients who receive TEC-enhanced treatment with financial incentives demonstrate increased participation in activities that promote mobility (physical therapy, yoga, tai chi) in comparison to patients receiving usual care. Secondary outcomes will include whether increased activity participation also reduces pain severity and opioid use, and improves function and increases the number of daily steps taken. The results of this pilot will enable us to determine what strategies are effective at increasing mobility and if these gains translate into reduced pain and decreased opioid use.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRegret lottery

Subjects who achieve step goals are entered into a lottery in which they can win a financial incentive of $30 or $100.

BEHAVIORALWay to Health technology enhanced care

Subjects receive text reminders to reach activity goals.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic non-malignant pain * High dose opioid therapy * Possession of activated cell phone with text messaging capabilities * Willingness to comply with study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Pain of malignant origin * Sensory impairments precluding use of text messaging and activity tracker * Physical disability precluding improvements in physical activity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activity Participation12 weeksStanford Exercise Questionnaire; min score = 0, max score = 180; higher scores = better outcome
Increased Mobility12 weekssteps per day measured by wearable step tracker at 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Opioid Use12 weeksmeasured by opioid morphine mg equivalents used each day (MED)
Physical Function12 weeksmeasured by interference with walking on PROMIS (Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain interference tool, which is a 6-item self-report survey; each item is scored from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), thus scores ranged from 6 to 30, with higher score indicating more pain interference.
Pain Severity12 weeksmeasured by pain severity on PROMIS (Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain severity tool, which is a 3-item self-report survey; each item is scored from 1 (no pain at all) to 5 (very severity), thus scores ranged from 3 to 15, with higher score indicating more severe pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Participate in technology-enabled care without regret lottery Way to Health technology enhanced care: Subjects receive text reminders to reach activity goals.
20
Experimental
Participate in technology-enabled care with regret lottery Regret lottery: Subjects who achieve step goals are entered into a lottery in which they can win a financial incentive of $30 or $100. Way to Health technology enhanced care: Subjects receive text reminders to reach activity goals.
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalExperimental
Age, Continuous55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants35 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants40 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants37 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Activity Participation

Stanford Exercise Questionnaire; min score = 0, max score = 180; higher scores = better outcome

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlActivity Participation156.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 116.8
ExperimentalActivity Participation135.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 123
p-value: =0.9ANCOVA
Primary

Increased Mobility

steps per day measured by wearable step tracker at 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlIncreased Mobility4313 steps per dayStandard Deviation 4231
ExperimentalIncreased Mobility4075 steps per dayStandard Deviation 5598
p-value: =0.88ANCOVA
Secondary

Daily Opioid Use

measured by opioid morphine mg equivalents used each day (MED)

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlDaily Opioid Use167.2 morphine mg equivalents per day (MED)Standard Deviation 244.4
ExperimentalDaily Opioid Use31.9 morphine mg equivalents per day (MED)Standard Deviation 35.53
p-value: <0.17ANCOVA
Secondary

Pain Severity

measured by pain severity on PROMIS (Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain severity tool, which is a 3-item self-report survey; each item is scored from 1 (no pain at all) to 5 (very severity), thus scores ranged from 3 to 15, with higher score indicating more severe pain.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPain Severity6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
ExperimentalPain Severity6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
p-value: =0.81ANCOVA
Secondary

Physical Function

measured by interference with walking on PROMIS (Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain interference tool, which is a 6-item self-report survey; each item is scored from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), thus scores ranged from 6 to 30, with higher score indicating more pain interference.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical Function25.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.94
ExperimentalPhysical Function24.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.49
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026