Skip to content

Breath and Air Stacking on Respiratory Mechanics in Tracheostomized Patients

Comparison Between Breath Stacking and Air Stacking on Respiratory Mechanics and Ventilatory Pattern in Tracheostomized Patients: Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04012489
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-07-09
Start date
2018-02-25
Completion date
2019-05-14
Last updated
2019-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Infection, Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

Physical Therapy Modalities, Respiratory Care Units, Respiratory Mechanics

Brief summary

The researchers hypothesized that the aid of the resuscitator by the technique Air Stacking increase lung volume, promoting increased lung compliance and improvement of the ventilatory pattern. In addition, Air Stacking does not depend on patient collaboration. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of breath stacking and air stacking techniques on respiratory mechanics and ventilatory pattern in patients admitted to the ICU

Interventions

Patients were connected to a unidirectional valve coupled to artificial airway (tracheostomy), with bacteriological filter. The ventilator was coupled to the unidirectional valve to measure inspiratory volume mobilized in each cycle and a connection to adapt a manometer. The patient performed successive inspirations for a maximum period of 30 seconds or until unidirectional valve opening or volume increase was observed for 2 consecutive efforts. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.

PROCEDUREAir Stacking

The same system of monitoring and adaptation of the ventilometer and manometer was carried out. A manual resuscitator coupled to a unidirectional valve was used, both connected to the tracheostomy, with a filter interface. Slow and successive inspirations were performed through slow compression of the resuscitator until the maximum inspiratory pressure reached 40 cmH2O. Ten cycles of the technique were performed, with an interval of 30 seconds.

Sponsors

Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients without mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours * Mucus hypersecretion (defined as the need for suctioning \< 2-h intervals)

Exclusion criteria

* bronchospasm. * Pleural effusion or pneumothorax undrained. * Bronchopleural or tracheoesophageal fistula. * Neuromuscular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Static compliance of respiratory systemBaseline (before) and immediately after Breath Stacking or Air StackingCompliance was assessed through the occlusion maneuver at the end of inspiration, considering tidal volume, plateau pressure and PEEP. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
Total Resistance of respiratory systemBaseline (before) and immediately after Breath Stacking or Air StackingThe total resistance of the respiratory system was evaluated through the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the resistive pressure, measured by the difference between the maximum plateau pressure. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026