Skip to content

Innovative Liver Elasticity, Attenuation, and Dispersion Ultrasound Study

Innovative Liver Elasticity, Attenuation, and Dispersion Ultrasound Study for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04012242
Acronym
iLEAD
Enrollment
400
Registered
2019-07-09
Start date
2019-06-15
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2022-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elastography, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Ultrasound

Keywords

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Ultrasound, Elastography, Dispersion

Brief summary

The objective of this study is: (1) to investigate the correlation of ultrasound parameters (SW speed, Dispersion slope, Attenuation value, Normalized Local Variance, Liver / Kidney Intensity Ratio) with the pathological parameters (fibrosis, intralobular inflammation, ballooning degeneration and steatosis); (2) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SW speed for liver fibrosis, Dispersion slope for intralobular inflammation and Attenuation value for steatosis by comparison with the tissue diagnosis by liver biopsy.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUltrasound application

Shear wave elastography, shear wave dispersion, attenuation imaging, and intensity analysis

Sponsors

Tokyo Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients who are scheduled for liver biopsy for the differential diagnosis of NASH and/or NAFLD patients who are scheduled for the MR elastography (MRE) and MRI-proton density fat friction (MRI-PDFF). * Without a history of alcohol use, which lead to alcoholic hepatic involvement (pure alcohol below 30 g/day for male, 20 g/day for female).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with endocrine disorder (hypopituitarism, growth hormone deficiency, hyperthyroidism etc.), serious nutrition disorder, and drug-induced hepatic involvement (steroid, tamoxifen, valproic acid, amiodarone etc.), which may lead to the steatosis * Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and HIV patients * Primary biliary cholangitis, Primary sclerosing cholangitis, and Autoimmune hepatitis patients * Wilson's disease, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and hemochromatosis patients * Malignant liver tumor, common bile duct stone, and jaundice patients * Patients after jejunoileal bypass surgery or massive intestinal resection surgery * Patients whose treatment changes during the period between imaging examination and liver biopsy, including medications such as antidiabetic drugs and other treatments which may change the fat deposition or inflammation of liver.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic performance of Dispersion slope for intralobular inflammation (A01 vs. A23)At the time of examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic performance of SW speed for fibrosis (F0 vs. F1234, F01 vs. F234, F012 vs. F34, and F0123 vs. F4).At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of Normalized Local Variance for fibrosis (F0 vs. F1234, F01 vs. F234, F012 vs. F34, and F0123 vs. F4)At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of Normalized Local Variance for steatosis (S0 vs. S123, S01 vs. S23, and S012 vs. S3)At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of Dispersion slope for intralobular inflammation (A0 vs. A123, and A012 vs. A3)At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of Attenuation value for steatosis (S0 vs. S123, S01 vs. S23, and S012 vs. S3)At the time of examination
Correlation between ultrasound parameters and the pathological parametersAt the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of the computer aided algorithm for NASHAt the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of MRI-PDFF for steatosis (S0 vs. S123, S01 vs. S23, and S012 vs. S3).At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of CAP for steatosis (S0 vs. S123, S01 vs. S23, and S012 vs. S3).At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of MRE for fibrosis (F0 vs. F1234, F01 vs. F234, F012 vs. F34, and F0123 vs. F4).At the time of examination
Diagnostic performance of Liver/Kidney Intensity Ratio for steatosis (S0 vs. S123, S01 vs. S23, and S012 vs. S3)At the time of examination

Countries

China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactFuminori Moriyasu, MD, PhD
moriyasy@iuhw.ac.jp+81-3-3402-3151
Backup ContactKatsutoshi Sugimoto, MD, PhD
sugimoto@tokyo-med.ac.jp+81-3-3342-6111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026