Skip to content

Speech Performance of Rugby Players When Using Different Types of Mouthguard

Speech Performance of Rugby Players When Using Different Types of Mouthguard

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04010500
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-07-08
Start date
2018-05-18
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Speech

Keywords

dental trauma, rugby, mouthguard, speech, contact sports

Brief summary

Participation in contact sports is linked to an increased risk of dental injuries. To reduce the risk and severity of sports-related dental injuries, mouthguards are often recommended to be worn during training and competition. However, athletes often complain that they cannot talk properly when using mouthguards. It is hypothesized that speech performance differs when using different types of mouthguards. A group of female national rugby players will be asked to pronounce four Malay words with plosive sounds (/p/, /b/, /d/ and /t/) repeatedly in three conditions: (i) when not using any mouthguard, (ii) when using 'boil and bite' mouthguard, and (iii) when using custom-fitted mouthguard. The sounds will be recorded for spectrographic analysis. The difference in mean voice onset time between conditions will be assessed.

Interventions

Control (not using mouthguard)

DEVICE'boil and bite' mouthguard

KHZ058 Bicolor Mouth Guard (Shenzhen Kanghao Industrial Co. Ltd, China) will be immersed in a bowl of hot water (about 80 °C). After 50 seconds, the softened sheet will be fitted on the maxillary arch of the participant. The participant will then bite down to ensure the mouthguard stay firmly on the maxilla. After that, the mouthguard will be removed and immersed in cold water to retain its shape.

DEVICEcustom-fitted mouthguard

The custom-fitted mouthguards will be constructed using the dual laminated technique with two layers of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) thermoplastic sheets (Dentsply International Raintree Essix, Court East Sarasota, USA).

Sponsors

Amy Liew
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The participants will articulate phonemes with plosive sounds (/p/, /b/, /d/ and /t/) for the following conditions in a pre-determined sequence: (i) not using mouthguard; (ii) using a 'boil and bite' mouthguard; and (iii) using a custom-fitted mouthguard. A washout interval of one hour will be implemented between conditions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adult female aged 18 years old and older * currently representing the nation and participating actively in rugby * native speakers of Malay (national language)

Exclusion criteria

* did not play rugby within the last six months * edentulism * used a mouthguard, orthodontic appliance or removable prosthodontics appliance within the last six months * known history of allergy to polymers * medical problems (ASA classification 3 and above)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean voice onset timeImmediateThe delay between the start of the speech sound and the beginning of vocal cord vibration (in millisecond)

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026