Skip to content

a Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of the Holistic Treatment of Young High-risk Multiple Myeloma Patients

Phase II Open Lable Clinical Study Efficacy and Safety of the Holistic Treatment for Young Patients With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04008888
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2018-01-05
Completion date
2020-08-01
Last updated
2019-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma, Plasma Cell Leukemia, Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Loss of Chromosome 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), T(14;20), 1Q21 Amplification, Complex Karyotype

Brief summary

The clinical trial was conducted in a cohort of young, high-risk myeloma patients who were designed to receive a combination of high-dose chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The objective was to assess the progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS),and overall response rate (ORR) of the overall treatment.

Detailed description

50 cases of HR-NDMM patients were divided into two groups nonrandomizedly. TE group received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after induction therapy. Allo-sct for the young patients with suitable donors, Asct for the others. TNE group received consolidation therapy after induction therapy. All patients received PI-based maintenance therapy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAllogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Day 0 Infusion of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. For the allogeneic matched-related donors peripheral blood stem cells will be harvested with GCSF mobilization and infused fresh to the recipients.

PROCEDUREAutologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation x 1 or x 2

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation :Stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) at a dose of 10 μg/kg/day followed collecting CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells . Day 0 Infusion of autologous stem cells. Patients during 3-6 months after the 1st SCT will undergo a 2nd SCT. Patients who had not enough PBSC will undergo a 1st SCT.

DRUGMelphalan Given IV

conditioning regimen: autologous ARM: Day -2 Melphalan 200 mg/m\^2/day IV over 30 minutes. allogeneic ARM: Day -4, Day -3 Melphalan 70 mg/m\^2/day IV over 30 minutes

conditioning regimen:Days -6,-5,-4,-3 Fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day IV

DRUGPI and dexamethasone as maintenance therapy

Bortezomib and dexamethasone(VD),Ixazomib and dexamethasone(ID)

DRUGPI+IMids+Dexamethasone as Consolidated Chemotherapy

Oral lenalidomide at the starting dose of 25mg on days 1-21 every 28 days or days 1-14 every 21 days. Dexamethasone at 20mg twice weekly on days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11&12 of each 21-day.

Sponsors

Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of high-risk multiple myeloma In addition, patients must meet at least one of the following criteria I-IX (I-VIII at time of diagnosis or pre-autograft): I.Complex karyotype II.Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) translocation 4:14 or 14:16, III.FISH translocation 1q21, IV.FISH deletion 17p, V.R-ISS III stage, VI.Two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities exist VII.Plasma cell leukemia VIII.Extramedullary plasmacytoma IX.Recurrent or non-responsive (less than partial remission \[PR\]) MM after at least 4 cycles of PI/IMids-based chemotherapy 2. candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation 3. ECOG performance status score of 0,1,or2 -

Exclusion criteria

1. The current diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of disease, Waldenstr o m macroglobulinemia. 2. during the first 5 years of the study, there were no other malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer. 3. according to the National Cancer Institute general toxicity criteria (NCI CTC), subjects had peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above: 4. were enrolled within 6 months before had a myocardial infarction, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure ,uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled severe ventricular arrhythmias or ECG evidence of acute ischemia or conduction system abnormalities and activity the clinical significance of pericardial disease, or cardiac amyloidosis -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
progression free survival(PFS)1 Year post-autograftPFS is defined as the duration from the data of registration to either progressive disease or death, whichever comes first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall response(ORR)1 Year post-autograftORR is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve PR to better rate, according to the IMWG criteria
overall survival(OS)1 Year post-autograftOS is defined as the duration from the data of registration to death.If the subject is alive, the data will be censored as being alive; the vital status is unknown as last known.
Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease and/or Chronic Extensive Graft-versus-Host-Disease1 year post-allograftaGVHD The diagnosis of aGVHD is identified through various stages and grading of the disease related to Skin (Rash), Gut (Diarrhea, Nausea/vomiting and/or anorexia) and the liver (Bilirubin) assessed by severity and grading scale outlined in the section Grafts vs Hosts by Sullivan (1999). GVHD Grades Grade I: 1-2 Skin Rash; No gut or liver involvement Grade II: Stage 1-3 Skin rash; Stage 1 gut and/or stage 1 liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2-4 gut involvement and/or stage 2-4 liver involvement with or without rash Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death cGVHD The diagnosis of cGVHD requires at least one manifestation that is distinctive for chronic GVHD as opposed to acute GVHD. In all cases, infection and others causes must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of chronic GVHD.
Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)1 year post-allograftNumber of patients with non-relapse mortalities
Number of Patients Who Had Infections1 Year post-autograftNumber of patients who had infections

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWEI W SUI, Dr.
suiweiwei@ihcams.ac.cn86-022-23909171
Backup ContactGANG AN, Dr.
angang@ihcams.ac.cn86-022-23909171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026