Skip to content

Sarilumab in Patients With Glucocorticoid-Dependent Sarcoidosis

A Phase II, Single-Site, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Withdrawal Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With Glucocorticoid-Dependent Sarcoidosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04008069
Enrollment
16
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-09-03
Completion date
2022-09-09
Last updated
2023-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcoidosis

Keywords

glucocorticoid-dependent

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and the safety of sarilumab in patients with glucocorticoid-dependent sarcoidosis.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectivness and the safety of sarilumab in patients with glucocorticoid-dependent sarcoidosis. To demonstrate that sarilumab treatment will be effective for inducing and maintaining glucocorticoid-free remission in male or female patients with biopsy proven active, glucocorticoid-dependent sarcoidosis affecting the lungs, lymph nodes, liver, kidneys, spleen, bone, soft tissues, skin, and/or eyes.

Interventions

DRUGSarilumab

Sarilumab 200 mg administered subcutaneously

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo administered subcutaneously

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Study doctor and personnel will not know whether you are assigned to the sarilumab group or the placebo group after Week 16.

Intervention model description

All subjects will all receive sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneously every two weeks for the first 16 weeks of the study. At Week 16, those patients who were able to successfully taper off of prednisone will then be assigned randomly to receive either sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneously every two weeks (study drug) or placebo subcutaneously for an additional 12 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven non-caseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis * negative infectious studies including AFB and fungal stains, and with compatible clinical and/or radiographic manifestations of sarcoidosis. * Involvement of the lungs (stage II or III pulmonary sarcoidosis), lymph nodes, liver, kidneys, spleen, bone, soft tissues, skin, and/or eyes. * At least one active manifestation, defined by the need for ongoing glucocorticoid treatment to control a sign or symptom of sarcoidosis, which requires treatment with prednisone (or equivalent corticosteroid) ≥ 10 mg and ≤ 60 mg daily (i.e. glucocorticoid dependence), with stable dosing for ≥ 28 days prior to baseline. * patients taking a glucocorticoid other than prednisone, will be changed to prednisone at the equivalent dose and take this daily for ≥ 14 days prior to baseline. * DMARDs including methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or anti-malarials (i.e. hydroxychloroquine) permitted must be stable for ≥ 28 days prior to baseline and remain stable during follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

* Stage IV pulmonary sarcoidosis. * Central nervous system sarcoidosis. * Cardiac sarcoidosis. * Prior treatment with an anti-IL-6 therapy. * Treatment with a biologic agent including rituximab, belimumab, TNF inhibitors, abatacept, or IL-17 inhibitors administered within 28 days prior to baseline (6 months for rituximab). * Treatment with cyclophosphamide within 3 months prior to baseline. * Treatment with prednisone \< 10 mg or \> 60 mg daily. * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the study drug. * History of, or current, inflammatory or autoimmune disease other than sarcoidosis which would present a safety issue or confound interpretation of the data. * Prior or current history of other significant concomitant illness that, according to the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study. These include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular (including stage III or IV cardiac failure according to the New York Heart Association classification), neurological (including demyelinating disease), active infectious diseases, or history of diverticulitis or gastrointestinal perforation. * Patients currently pregnant or breast-feeding. * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) who are unwilling to utilize adequate contraception and unwilling to not become pregnant during the full course of the study (must be willing to be tested for pregnancy). Adequate contraceptive measures include oral contraceptives (continuous use, as per prescription, for 2 or more cycles prior to screening), intrauterine devices, contraceptive sponges, condoms or diaphragms plus foam, or jelly, or surgical procedures such as bilateral tubal ligation or vasectomy in partner. * Administration of a live/attenuated vaccine within 30 days. * Evidence of active tuberculosis, HIV, or hepatitis B or C infection. * History of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer. * Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities at the screening visit: hemoglobin \<8.5 g/dL, white blood cells \<3000/mm3, neutrophils \<2000/mm3, platelet count \<150,000 cells/mm3, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or ALT \>1.5 x ULN, and/or bilirubin (total) above the upper limit of normal (unless Gilbert's disease has been determined by genetic testing and documented). * Presence of severe uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia (\>350 mg/dL, 9.1 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (\>500 mg/dL, 5.6 mmol/L) at screening or baseline. * Patients with calculated creatinine clearance \<30 mL/minute (using Cockroft-Gault formula). * History of alcohol or drug abuse within 5 years prior to the screening visit. * Participation in any clinical research study evaluating another investigational drug or therapy within 5 half-lives or 60 days of first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration, whichever is longer. * Any patient who has had surgery within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or with planned surgery during the course of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Without Sarcoidosis Flare (Flare-Free Survival)Week 16 to Week 28The primary outcome was flare-free survival of sarilumab-treated patients compared to placebo-treated controls. Patients will be considered to have flared if they receive rescue medication including increased glucocorticoids, or if they discontinue the study treatment in order to start a different therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedBaseline, and week 16DLCO is a pulmonary function test, and measures the partial pressure difference between inspired and expired carbon monoxide. DLCO% predicted is defined as DLCO% of the patient divided by the average DLCO% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition.
Change in Pulmonary Function (FEV1) Percent PredictedBaseline and week 16FEV1 percent predicted is a normalized value of FEV1 calculated using the Knudson equation and based upon participant age, gender, and height.
Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreBaseline, week 16, and week 28Physician and patient assessments assessed using the extrapulmonary physician organ severity tool (ePOST). Score Description: 0: Not affected 1. Slight 2. Mild 3. Moderate 4. Moderate to severe 5. Severe 6. Very Severe 17 organ domains were rated and summed to create a total score (range 0-102, higher scores correspond with more severity).
Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline, week 16, and week 28Physician rates patient's disease on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.
Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline, week 16, and week 28Patient rates their disease on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.
Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Baseline, week 16, and week 28FACIT-F score Total score range: 0-52, lower scores correspond with more fatigue.
Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationBaseline, week 16, and week 28The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 68 joints for tenderness and pain with movement and 66 joints for swelling (hip joints can be evaluated for tenderness only, not for swelling. Joint evaluation score: 0: Absent 1: Present 9: Not applicable
Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisBaseline, week 16, and week 28Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index evaluates 7 parameters on a 0 to 4 scale, summed for an overall scale score of 0 to 28 (higher values indicate higher activity/severity).
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedBaseline and week 16FVC is a pulmonary function test, and is defined as the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after taking a full breath. FVC% predicted is defined as FVC% of the patient divided by the average FVC% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition.
Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeBaseline, week 16, and week 28ACE is a serum marker that is increased in sarcoidosis. ACE is produced by epithelioid cells that are derived from recently-activated macrophages in granulomas; thus, ACE is an appropriate representative of whole-body granuloma.
Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, week 16, and week 28CRP is a protein made by the liver. The level of CRP increases when there's inflammation in the body.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline, week 16, and week 28ESR is the rate at which red blood cells in anticoagulated whole blood descend in a standardized tube over a period of one hour.
Change in Prednisone DoseBaseline, week 16, and week 28
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeBaseline, week 16, and week 28Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.
Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeBaseline, week 16, and week 28Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.
Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeBaseline, week 16, and week 28Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.
Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeBaseline, week 16, and week 28Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.
Change in Size of Sarcoidosis LesionsBaseline, week 16, and week 28

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Sixteen participants were screened, fifteen met eligibility criteria and were allocated to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants who enter the study, to receive open-label sarilumab every two weeks for 16 weeks.
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Open-Label PeriodAdverse Event100
Open-Label PeriodLack of Efficacy400
Randomized-Withdrawal PeriodAdverse Event012
Randomized-Withdrawal PeriodLack of Efficacy001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51
Age, Customized
< 50 years
4 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 50 Years
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 20 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 151 / 25 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 150 / 20 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Without Sarcoidosis Flare (Flare-Free Survival)

The primary outcome was flare-free survival of sarilumab-treated patients compared to placebo-treated controls. Patients will be considered to have flared if they receive rescue medication including increased glucocorticoids, or if they discontinue the study treatment in order to start a different therapy.

Time frame: Week 16 to Week 28

Population: Assessed in participants in the randomized-withdrawal period

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants Without Sarcoidosis Flare (Flare-Free Survival)2 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants Without Sarcoidosis Flare (Flare-Free Survival)7 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

ESR is the rate at which red blood cells in anticoagulated whole blood descend in a standardized tube over a period of one hour.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 16-3.00 cells per hourStandard Deviation 6.51
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline9.33 cells per hourStandard Deviation 5.65
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 28-2.00 cells per hourStandard Deviation 6.96
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 16-7.00 cells per hourStandard Deviation 1.41
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline9.50 cells per hourStandard Deviation 2.12
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 28-6.00 cells per hour
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline10.9 cells per hourStandard Deviation 7.38
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 28-1.20 cells per hourStandard Deviation 7.46
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Change at week 16-3.43 cells per hourStandard Deviation 6.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale Score

Physician and patient assessments assessed using the extrapulmonary physician organ severity tool (ePOST). Score Description: 0: Not affected 1. Slight 2. Mild 3. Moderate 4. Moderate to severe 5. Severe 6. Very Severe 17 organ domains were rated and summed to create a total score (range 0-102, higher scores correspond with more severity).

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 16-0.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreBaseline2.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 28-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 16-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreBaseline7.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 28-2.00 score on a scale
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreBaseline2.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 28-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) Scale ScoreChange at week 16-0.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)

FACIT-F score Total score range: 0-52, lower scores correspond with more fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 285.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 161.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Baseline38.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 16-1.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Baseline51.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 280 score on a scale
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Baseline37.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 286.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score (Fatigue Scale)Change at Week 165.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent Predicted

FVC is a pulmonary function test, and is defined as the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after taking a full breath. FVC% predicted is defined as FVC% of the patient divided by the average FVC% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedBaseline92.1 FVC % predictedStandard Deviation 19.8
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedChange at week 16-2.69 FVC % predictedStandard Deviation 4.89
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedBaseline113 FVC % predictedStandard Deviation 14.9
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedChange at week 16-11.0 FVC % predicted
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedBaseline95.9 FVC % predictedStandard Deviation 17.3
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Percent PredictedChange at week 16-1.38 FVC % predictedStandard Deviation 4.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent Predicted

DLCO is a pulmonary function test, and measures the partial pressure difference between inspired and expired carbon monoxide. DLCO% predicted is defined as DLCO% of the patient divided by the average DLCO% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition.

Time frame: Baseline, and week 16

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedBaseline92.6 DLCO % predictedStandard Deviation 21.4
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedChange at week 16-14.8 DLCO % predictedStandard Deviation 23.5
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedBaseline90 DLCO % predicted
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedBaseline93.5 DLCO % predictedStandard Deviation 22.8
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-corrected Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) Percent PredictedChange at week 16-18.4 DLCO % predictedStandard Deviation 28.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Patient rates their disease on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 16-4.86 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 17.8
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline33.1 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 22.7
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-3.00 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 34.4
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 160.50 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 7.78
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline11.5 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 9.19
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-5.00 units on a scale (mm)
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline27.4 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 23.6
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-2.50 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 39.8
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Patient Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 16-11.1 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 19.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Physician rates patient's disease on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 16-22.8 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 22.2
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline48.0 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 13.2
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-31.8 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 13.5
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 16-13.0 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 5.66
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline38.5 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 20.5
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-21.0 units on a scale (mm)
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline45.3 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 13.9
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 28-34.0 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 13.9
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Physician Disease Activity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change at week 16-35.6 units on a scale (mm)Standard Deviation 11.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting Enzyme

ACE is a serum marker that is increased in sarcoidosis. ACE is produced by epithelioid cells that are derived from recently-activated macrophages in granulomas; thus, ACE is an appropriate representative of whole-body granuloma.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 1618.1 U/LStandard Deviation 24.6
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeBaseline35.4 U/LStandard Deviation 23.5
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 287.17 U/LStandard Deviation 20.4
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 1655.5 U/LStandard Deviation 51.6
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeBaseline63.0 U/LStandard Deviation 7.07
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 2814.0 U/L
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeBaseline32.6 U/LStandard Deviation 26.6
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 285.80 U/LStandard Deviation 22.5
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum Angiotensin Converting EnzymeChange at week 168.12 U/LStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP is a protein made by the liver. The level of CRP increases when there's inflammation in the body.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 16-0.20 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.76
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline0.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.49
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 28-0.20 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.55
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 16-0.90 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.13
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline0.90 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.13
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 280 mg/dL
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline0.41 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.42
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 28-0.24 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.61
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Change at week 16-0.22 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Change in Prednisone Dose

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome

Secondary

Change in Pulmonary Function (FEV1) Percent Predicted

FEV1 percent predicted is a normalized value of FEV1 calculated using the Knudson equation and based upon participant age, gender, and height.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: Data were collected during the open-label portion of the study only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change in Pulmonary Function (FEV1) Percent PredictedBaseline89.0 FEV1 % predictedStandard Deviation 19.86
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Change in Pulmonary Function (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 1686.0 FEV1 % predictedStandard Deviation 18.25
Secondary

Change in Size of Sarcoidosis Lesions

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome

Secondary

Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal Range

Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal Range

Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal Range

Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal Range

Normal range as calculated by the local laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeBaseline0 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 280 Participants
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Participants With Urine Protein Outside Normal RangeWeek 160 Participants
Secondary

Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint Evaluation

The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 68 joints for tenderness and pain with movement and 66 joints for swelling (hip joints can be evaluated for tenderness only, not for swelling. Joint evaluation score: 0: Absent 1: Present 9: Not applicable

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants who presented with inflammatory arthritis and with available data at each respective time point are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationBaseline - swollen joints20 joints
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationBaseline - tender joints20 joints
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 16 - tender joints4 joints
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 16 - swollen joints18 joints
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 28 - tender joints0 joints
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 28 - swollen joints8 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 28 - tender joints0 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 16 - swollen joints16 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationBaseline - tender joints18 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationBaseline - swollen joints18 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 28 - swollen joints8 joints
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Number of Tender and Swollen Joints Per 68/66 Joint EvaluationWeek 16 - tender joints0 joints
Secondary

Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index evaluates 7 parameters on a 0 to 4 scale, summed for an overall scale score of 0 to 28 (higher values indicate higher activity/severity).

Time frame: Baseline, week 16, and week 28

Population: Participants who presented with cutaneous sarcoidosis and with available data at each respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisWeek 1616.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Double-Blind Sarilumab (Post-randomization)Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisBaseline12.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.29
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisBaseline9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisWeek 169.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Double-Blind Placebo (Post-randomization)Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index for Cutaneous SarcoidosisWeek 289.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026