Skip to content

Neurostimulation In Adult Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Neurostimulation In Adult Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04007601
Enrollment
127
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-12-12
Completion date
2023-06-21
Last updated
2023-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Keywords

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Neurocognitive impairment, Executive dysfunction, Survivorship

Brief summary

Long-term survivors of ALL are at-risk for neurocognitive impairment, particularly in the area of executive functioning. Relatively limited research has focused on interventions for improving neurocognitive outcomes in long-term survivors of ALL. A promising technique for cognitive enhancement is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) which differs from conventional cognitive remediation approaches in that it directly stimulates specific brain regions responsible for cognitive processes and activates functional networks similar to those activated during cognitive training. Primary Objective To evaluate the efficacy of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with remote cognitive training on direct testing of executive function in survivors of ALL. Secondary Objectives * To evaluate the efficacy of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with remote cognitive training on patient-reported symptoms of executive dysfunction in survivors of ALL. * To examine the effects of home-based tDCS paired with remote cognitive training on patterns of regional brain activation as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. * To examine the effects of home-based tDCS paired with remote cognitive training on white matter integrity and structure as measured by diffusion tensor imaging.

Detailed description

Eligible participants will be randomized to receive 1 mA direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or placebo/sham for 20 minutes. All participants will receive home-based computerized cognitive training. Participants will complete tDCS paired with cognitive training 2 times per week for 6-months.

Interventions

DEVICEActive tDCS

Participants will receive active 1mA direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 minutes. Cognitive training: Participants will complete 20 minutes of online cognitive training via Lumosity two days per week for a 6-month intervention period.

DEVICESham tDCS

Participants will receive sham (no direct current) stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 minutes. Cognitive training: Participants will complete 20 minutes of online cognitive training via Lumosity two days per week for a 6-month intervention period.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at SJCRH \< 21 years at diagnosis * Enrolled on St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study * ≥ 5 years post-diagnosis of ALL * ≥ 2 years post-treatment completion deemed to impact the central nervous system. * Currently between 18 and 39 years of age * English language proficiency * Executive dysfunction defined as having an age-adjusted standard score \<16th percentile on Trail Making Test Part B, Controlled Oral Word association Test, or Digit Span Backward * Patient-reported executive dysfunction defined as a standard score \>84th percentile on the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire or the Behavior Rating Scale of Executive Function

Exclusion criteria

* Full scale intelligence score \<80 * Currently taking medication intended to treat neurocognitive impairment (e.g. stimulants) * Participated in a past trial of neurostimulation * Female who is pregnant or breastfeeding * History of seizures within the past year * Implanted medical devices or metal in the head * History of head injury or a neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e. genetic disorder, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) associated with neurocognitive impairment and unrelated to cancer treatment * Currently receiving cancer directed therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Direct Testing of Executive Function: Change in Working Memory from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline & 6-month follow-upDigit Span Backward: Digit Span Backward (DSB), from the Digit Span subtest on the WAIS-IV, is a measure of working memory. The number of digits recalled in the longest span is converted to a standard z-score using age-based norms (Mean=0, SD=1).
Direct Testing of Executive Function: Change in Cognitive Flexibility in baseline to 6 monthsBaseline & 6-month follow-upTrail Making Test Part B (Trails B): This is a timed task that requires a participant to shift his/her attention adaptively and flexibly. Age-based standardized z-scores are calculated (Mean=0, SD=1).
Direct Testing of Executive Function: Change in Verbal Fluency from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline & 6-month follow-upControlled Oral Word Association (COWA): This is a task of cognitive/verbal fluency that measures spontaneous production of words beginning with a designated letter or category. Age-based standardized z-scores are calculated (Mean=0, SD=1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient-Reported Symptoms of Executive Functioning from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline and 6-month follow-upPatient reported symptoms of executive dysfunction will be evaluated via the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire (CCSS-NCQ). The CCSS-NCQ is a 32-item questionnaire evaluating 4 domains of executive function. Z-scores (M=0, SD=1) are calculated using sibling data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.
Change in Brain Connectivity from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline and 6-month follow-upWhite connectivity will be measured via diffusion tensor imaging and resting state fMRI (rsFMRI). The cortex will be parcellated into anatomical regions based on the high-resolution T1-weighted imaging using the FreeSurfer software (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). Probabilistic fiber tracking will be performed for individual seed points within the gray matter/white matter surface for each parcellated cortical region to evaluate strength of the connectivity between each individual region and every other region. The current project will focus analyses on the frontostriatal connections from the DLPFC to the striatum. rsfMRI data will be used to construct functional connectomes for each participant at each time point. We will measure several common connectome properties including global and local efficiency. Connectome modularity, degree distribution, and hub characteristics will also be measured.
Change in Regional Brian Activation from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline and 6-month follow-upRegional brain activation will be assessed using an N-Back Task. This task requires a participant to respond to a presented stimulus only when it is the same as one presented on a trial at a predetermined number prior to the current trial. For this study, we plan to use 1-back and 2-back trials. Improved efficiency will be defined as reduced activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during performance on the N-Back task during the fMRI. Using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London), contrast-images from the fixed-effect analysis in each subject will be used for second level random-effect analysis to create group activation maps. These contrasts include pre- v. post-intervention imaging during the N-back task. Participants assigned to active stimulation will then be contrasted to those assigned to sham stimulation.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026