Skip to content

Treatment of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) With Sodium Oxybate

Sodium Oxybate in Treatment-Resistant REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD): A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04006925
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-09-10
Completion date
2022-02-01
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

Keywords

sodium oxybate

Brief summary

This study is the first clinical trial using sodium oxybate for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Sodium oxybate is a drug approved by FDA for the treatment of narcolepsy which has been used off label to treat patients with severe RBD. This drug has shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with RBD (Shneerson, 2009; Liebenthal, 2016; Moghadam, 2017).

Detailed description

Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a condition resulting in violent dream-enactment during sleep which affects millions of individuals in the United States, however therapies for RBD are limited and cause significant side effects. As a result, despite using a combination of drugs, a large number of patients with RBD continue to act out violent dreams causing severe self-injuries or injuries to their bed partners. Prior studies and our experience have shown that sodium oxybate can be effective in these cases of treatment-resistant RBD. This study would therefore evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of sodium oxybate in this patient population. This study is an 8-week trial comparing sodium oxybate versus placebo randomly assigned to patients with treatment-resistant RBD, i.e. individuals who have insufficiently responded or tolerated melatonin and clonazepam. The study uses a double-blind design (participants, staff, and investigators will not know which drug between active drug and placebo is given to participants), and will measure treatment efficacy based on patients, partners and clinicians report, and objective outcomes based on in-home actigraphy and in-lab polysomnography before and after intervention.

Interventions

DRUGSodium Oxybate

Sodium Oxybate will be titrated up weekly by 1.5g nightly dose increments from an initial 4.5g total nightly dose (which could be given in two unequal doses if needed, or one single dose no greater than 4.5g) to an optimal individual dose based on clinical response on RBD symptoms and tolerance, to a maximum nightly dose of 9g (flexible dose period lasting up to 8 weeks). The optimal dose will then be continued for at least 4 weeks (stable dose).

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo will be similar in appearance, smell and flavor to the subjects, so that the investigators and participants will be unable to distinguish it from sodium oxybate.

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 40-85 years old * With or without Parkinson's disease * Experiencing RBD episodes on average at least 2x/week or 8x/month * Able to report RBD episodes themselves or via a partner witness

Exclusion criteria

* History of falls during ambulation in the last 6 months despite adequate neurologic treatment * Requirement of an ambulatory device at home * Inadequately treated symptomatic orthostatic hypotension * BMI \> 35 * Untreated or uncontrolled OSA (4%AHI\>15) * Cognitive impairment resulting in inability to comply with treatment instructions * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Assessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)Patients record any episode of dream enactment, such as talking, shouting, kicking, or punching, etc.
Number of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Assessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)Patients record any episode of dream enactment, such as talking, shouting, kicking, or punching, etc. Severity is scored from 1 to 3 (1: least severe, 3 most severe): 1. non injurious behaviors: facial expressions, non-aggressive vocalizations (mumbling, gentle talking, casual conversation, singing, laughing...), twitches, gentle shaking, non-aggressive movements of fingers, arms or legs...; 2. potentially injurious: punching, kicking, arm flailing or thrashing around, at least one limb or head out of bed, sitting up in bed, crawling, attempting to stand up or leave bed, near falls, cursing, screaming, shouting, yelling, or any behavior requiring bed partner to wake up participant; 3. injurious: any contact with bed partner (hitting or grabbing), wall or furniture, any fall or leaving bed (doving out, walking, jumping). The number of injurious (severe) episodes is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreAssessed at baseline and week 12Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a scale to assess patients' general level of sleepiness. Patients choose the most appropriate number (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing) for the each situation: Sitting and reading, Watching TV, Sitting and inactive in a public place, As a passenger in a car for an hour, Lying down to rest in the afternoon, Sitting and talking to someone, Sitting quietly after a lunch, While stopped for a few minutes in the traffic in a car. 0-10: Normal range, 10-12: Borderline, 12-24: Abnormal. Participants recorded their scores for 28 days at baseline and during the 28 days leading up to week 12; scores were then averaged to calculate the score for each time point per participant, and then the median for all participants is reported.
Number of Responders According to the CGI Efficacy Scale (CGI-E)Assessed at week 12 (end of treatment period).Clinical Global Impression-Efficacy index (CGI-E) is a 4x4 rating scale that assesses the therapeutic effect (Marked, Moderate, Minimal, Unchanged or worse) of treatment medication and associated side effects (none, do not significantly interfere with patient's functioning, significantly interfere with patient's functioning, Outweigh therapeutic effect). Therapeutic effect: Marked and Side effects: None is the best. Therapeutic effect: Unchanged or worse and Side effects: outweigh therapeutic effect is the worst. Each combination of an estimated therapeutic effect and side effect is assigned a score from 1-16, 1 being the best, 16 being the worst. Participants scoring below 4 were considered to be responders.
Change in Ambulatory Measures of Movements During Sleep Using ActigraphyAssessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)Measure of activity score using in-home 4-week actigraphy
RBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM SleepAssessed at baseline and week 12 (average approximately 8 hours to assess at each time point)The average number of dream-enactment episodes (resulting in motor behaviors, or movements) weighted for severity. Frequency and severity were calculated as the sum of RBD episodes (frequency) times severity (mild = 1; moderate = 5, severe = 10) occurring over one night's sleep, then averaged to calculate the number of episodes per 10 minutes of REM sleep.
Number of Responders According to the CGI Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Assessed at week 12 (end of treatment period).Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1. Very much improved, 2. Much improved, 3. Minimally improved, 4. No change, 5. Minimally worse, 6. Much worse, 7. Very much worse. 1 is the best and 7 is the worst. Participants scoring below 4 were considered to be responders.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) Arm
For each participant, Sodium Oxybate (SXB) starting at a 4.5g total nightly dose then titrated up weekly by 1.5g increments over 8 weeks to establish their optimal individualized dose (based on their clinical response on RBD symptoms and tolerance). Participant then receive their optimal dose for at least 4 weeks.
12
Placebo (PBO) Arm
Placebo similar in appearance, smell and flavor so that it is indistinguishable from sodium oxybate.
12
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudySide effects20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo (PBO) ArmSodium Oxybate (SXB) Arm
Age, Continuous65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Body Mass Index (BMI)25.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
27.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
24.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Current Treatment
Antidepressant
8 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Current Treatment
Cholinergic
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Current Treatment
Clonazepam
9 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Current Treatment
Dopaminergic
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Current Treatment
Melatonin
14 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
History of Injuries22 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Insomnia7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Parkinson disease12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
RBD Symptom Duration9.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
11.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Sleep Apnea7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 122 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Number of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)

Patients record any episode of dream enactment, such as talking, shouting, kicking, or punching, etc.

Time frame: Assessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)

Population: Participants with data at each time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Baseline37.5 episodes
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Final dose23.5 episodes
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Baseline35.0 episodes
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Final dose25.5 episodes
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-41, -2]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-21.5, 0]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.2795% CI: [-32, 11.3]Mann Whitney U test
Primary

Number of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)

Patients record any episode of dream enactment, such as talking, shouting, kicking, or punching, etc. Severity is scored from 1 to 3 (1: least severe, 3 most severe): 1. non injurious behaviors: facial expressions, non-aggressive vocalizations (mumbling, gentle talking, casual conversation, singing, laughing...), twitches, gentle shaking, non-aggressive movements of fingers, arms or legs...; 2. potentially injurious: punching, kicking, arm flailing or thrashing around, at least one limb or head out of bed, sitting up in bed, crawling, attempting to stand up or leave bed, near falls, cursing, screaming, shouting, yelling, or any behavior requiring bed partner to wake up participant; 3. injurious: any contact with bed partner (hitting or grabbing), wall or furniture, any fall or leaving bed (doving out, walking, jumping). The number of injurious (severe) episodes is reported.

Time frame: Assessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)

Population: Participants with data at each time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Baseline1.5 episodes
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Final dose0.5 episodes
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Baseline1.5 episodes
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of Severe of RBD Episodes in One Month (Per Patient RBD Log)Final dose1.0 episodes
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.0295% CI: [-3, 0]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.8395% CI: [-1, 1]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.0995% CI: [-3.5, 0]Mann Whitney U test
Secondary

Change in Ambulatory Measures of Movements During Sleep Using Actigraphy

Measure of activity score using in-home 4-week actigraphy

Time frame: Assessed for 28 days at baseline and during last month of treatment (total treatment period of up to 12 weeks)

Population: Analysis was not possible because the data that were collected were corrupted and uninterpretable.

Secondary

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a scale to assess patients' general level of sleepiness. Patients choose the most appropriate number (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing) for the each situation: Sitting and reading, Watching TV, Sitting and inactive in a public place, As a passenger in a car for an hour, Lying down to rest in the afternoon, Sitting and talking to someone, Sitting quietly after a lunch, While stopped for a few minutes in the traffic in a car. 0-10: Normal range, 10-12: Borderline, 12-24: Abnormal. Participants recorded their scores for 28 days at baseline and during the 28 days leading up to week 12; scores were then averaged to calculate the score for each time point per participant, and then the median for all participants is reported.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and week 12

Population: Participants with data at each time point are included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline8.0 score on a scale
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreFinal dose5.0 score on a scale
Placebo (PBO) ArmEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline9.5 score on a scale
Placebo (PBO) ArmEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreFinal dose7.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-7, 2]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.4395% CI: [-3.5, 2]Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-4, 3]Mann Whitney U test
Secondary

Number of Responders According to the CGI Efficacy Scale (CGI-E)

Clinical Global Impression-Efficacy index (CGI-E) is a 4x4 rating scale that assesses the therapeutic effect (Marked, Moderate, Minimal, Unchanged or worse) of treatment medication and associated side effects (none, do not significantly interfere with patient's functioning, significantly interfere with patient's functioning, Outweigh therapeutic effect). Therapeutic effect: Marked and Side effects: None is the best. Therapeutic effect: Unchanged or worse and Side effects: outweigh therapeutic effect is the worst. Each combination of an estimated therapeutic effect and side effect is assigned a score from 1-16, 1 being the best, 16 being the worst. Participants scoring below 4 were considered to be responders.

Time frame: Assessed at week 12 (end of treatment period).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of Responders According to the CGI Efficacy Scale (CGI-E)10 Participants
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of Responders According to the CGI Efficacy Scale (CGI-E)6 Participants
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.08Mann Whitney U test
Secondary

Number of Responders According to the CGI Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1. Very much improved, 2. Much improved, 3. Minimally improved, 4. No change, 5. Minimally worse, 6. Much worse, 7. Very much worse. 1 is the best and 7 is the worst. Participants scoring below 4 were considered to be responders.

Time frame: Assessed at week 12 (end of treatment period).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmNumber of Responders According to the CGI Improvement Scale (CGI-I)10 Participants
Placebo (PBO) ArmNumber of Responders According to the CGI Improvement Scale (CGI-I)7 Participants
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.18Mann Whitney U test
Secondary

RBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM Sleep

The average number of dream-enactment episodes (resulting in motor behaviors, or movements) weighted for severity. Frequency and severity were calculated as the sum of RBD episodes (frequency) times severity (mild = 1; moderate = 5, severe = 10) occurring over one night's sleep, then averaged to calculate the number of episodes per 10 minutes of REM sleep.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and week 12 (average approximately 8 hours to assess at each time point)

Population: Participants with data available at the respective time points are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmRBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM SleepBaseline13.2 episodes*severity per 10 minutes of REMStandard Deviation 12.3
Sodium Oxybate (SXB) ArmRBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM SleepFinal dose7.2 episodes*severity per 10 minutes of REMStandard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (PBO) ArmRBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM SleepFinal dose10.5 episodes*severity per 10 minutes of REMStandard Deviation 10
Placebo (PBO) ArmRBD Episode Severity and Frequency During REM Sleep by Quantitative Video-PSG (Polysomnography) Analysis Per 10 Minutes of REM SleepBaseline10.1 episodes*severity per 10 minutes of REMStandard Deviation 8.4
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.2395% CI: [-15.2, 1.7]Unpaired T-test
Comparison: Within group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.9595% CI: [-4.6, 4.5]Unpaired T-test
Comparison: Between group analysis of change from baseline.p-value: 0.2295% CI: [-16.2, 3.1]Paired T-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026