Skip to content

Evaluation of Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy With Immediate Implant Placement in Vertically Deficient Anterior Maxilla

Evaluation of Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy With Immediate Implant Placement in Vertically Deficient Anterior Maxilla

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04006678
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-07-31
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2019-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sandwich Osteotomy

Brief summary

In conventional segmental sandwich osteotomy technique the moving the transport segment inferiorly to increase the vertical height causes the segment to move bucco-palatally, increasing the horizontal defect. So using the computer guided in segmental sandwich osteotomy and fixation the transport segment hopefully will reduce the bucco-palatal tipping.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcomputer guided sandwich osteotomy

segmental sandwich osteotomy will be done for vertically deficient ridges in anterior area of the maxilla. Either using surgical guides (Computer guide segmental sandwich osteotomy technique) for study group and conventional segmental sandwich osteotomy technique for control group.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with vertically deficient anterior maxillary ridge a minimum 10 mm. height of alveolar bone. * Patients with medical history that did not hinder implant placement (uncontrolled diabetes) and adequate proper oral hygiene. * Patients of adequate alveolar bone width. * Both genders males and females will be included.

Exclusion criteria

* General contraindications to implant surgery. * Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation. * Untreated periodontitis. * Poor oral hygiene and motivation. * Uncontrolled diabetes. * Pregnant or nursing. * Substance abuse. * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. * Severe bruxism or clenching. * Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. * Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. * Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement. * Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement. * Need of bone augmentation procedures at implant placement. * Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling. * Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed. * Referred only for implant placement or unable to attend a 5-year follow-up. * Requiring only single implant-supported crowns.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bucco - palatal tipping6 monthscalculate the amount of bucco-palaltal tipping of mobilized transport segment after 6 months in mm by cone beam CT between both groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
marginal bone loss6 monthscalculate marginal bone loss in mm by cone beam CT between two groups

Contacts

Primary ContactShareif Ali, PhD
surgeryeb@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201001932020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026