Alopecia Areata
Conditions
Keywords
Alopecia, Alopecia Areata, Alopecia totalis, Alopecia universalis, Hair loss, JAK inhibitor, PF-06651600, Ritlecitinib
Brief summary
This is a global Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an investigational study drug (called PF-06651600) in adults and adolescents (12 years and older) who have alopecia areata. Eligible patients from the prior studies B7931005 (NCT02974868) and B7981015 (NCT03732807) will have an opportunity to enroll as well as patients who have not previously participated in either of these studies. The study is open-label and all patients entering the study will receive active study drug. A sub-study of approximately 60 adult patients who are participating in the B7981032 study will be conducted at select sites in the US, Australia and Canada. The sub-study will evaluate the immune response to tetanus and meningococcal vaccines in patients who have received a minimum of 6 months of 50 mg PF-06651600.
Interventions
50 mg oral tablets/capsules
Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study
Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
- For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: * Clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) with no other cause of hair loss. Androgenetic alopecia coexistent with AA is allowed. * De novo participants \>=12 to \<18 years of age: \>=50% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis * De novo participants \>=18 years of age and participants from Study B7931005 or B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: \>=25% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis * No evidence of terminal scalp hair regrowth within 6 months (de novo only) * Current episode of terminal scalp hair loss \<=10 years (de novo only)
Exclusion criteria
- For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: * Hearing loss with progression over previous 5 years, or sudden hearing loss, or middle or inner ear disease, or other auditory condition that is considered acute, fluctuating or progressive * History of or current malignancies with the exception of adequately treated or excised non metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ * History of a single episode of disseminated herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex, or a history of more than one episode of localized, dermatomal herpes zoster * Infection requiring hospitalization, or parenteral antimicrobial therapy within 6 months prior to Day 1
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate \[beats per minute (bpm)\] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP\<90mmHg, DBP\<50 mmHg and pulse rate\<40mmHg. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40) | Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (\<0.8\*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN), Prothrombin Time(\>1.1\*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5\*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (\>3.0\*ULN); Albumin, Urate (\<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol \>1.3\*ULN; Cholesterol \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium \< 0.9x LLN \& \> 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite \>=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes \>=20; Epithelial Cells\>=6, Hyaline Cast\>1; Bacteria\>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response | Month 1 | Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: \>=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was \<=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR \>=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was \>2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | Vital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator. |
| Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of Study | From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study | Following laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032. |
| Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032). |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms with responses scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations with responses scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score was calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss from the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes and body using a 5 point scale that ranged from 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with AAPPO domain scores of 0 = no hair loss or 1 = a little hair loss, among participants with score \>=2 at baseline are reported. |
| Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032. |
| Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Improvement on HADS depression score was considered as achieving a "normal" depression subscale score indicative of an absence of depression. Among adults, a HADS-D score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-D score of 0-6 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Improvement on HADS anxiety score was considered as achieving a "normal" anxiety subscale score indicative of an absence of anxiety. Among adults, a HADS-A score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-A score of 0-8 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | Month 1 | Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=1.0 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | Month 1 | Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | Month 1 | Percentage of participants with \>=4 times increase in anti-tetanus antibody level from baseline were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | From Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) to Month 1 | Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Fold change was defined as the ratio of the post-baseline result to the baseline result. The assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5 \* LLOQ except when pre-vaccination assay results is \< LLOQ while postvaccination result is \>= LLOQ, in which case the pre-vaccination value will be set to LLOQ. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | Month 1 | Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | Month 1 | Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.8 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | Month 1 | Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.4 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) and Month 1 | Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs | From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs | From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation | From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Pfizer
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
This study consisted of Main study and vaccine sub-study. A total of 1052 participants were enrolled in the Main study and a total of 17 participants who received at least 6 months of study treatment in the main study were enrolled in the vaccine sub-study. Results are reported at primary completion date (PCD).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) Participants with a clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) received ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 4 weeks followed by 50 mg ritlecitinib QD for 35 months during treatment period 1. After completion of treatment period 1, participants not continuing to treatment period 2 entered a follow-up period of 4 weeks. Participants from countries where ritlecitinib was not commercially available continued to receive 50 mg ritlecitinib QD in treatment period 2 for a maximum of 24 months or until availability of commercial product in their country, or until the sponsor terminated the study in that country, whichever occurred first. Participants who permanently discontinued study treatment entered an Observation Period where they completed the scheduled study visits for approximately 2 years or until study end, whichever occurred first.Adolescent participants who did not achieve a SALT score of 20 or less by Month 6 were required to discontinue their participation in the study. | 449 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) Participants with a clinical diagnosis of AA who received ritlecitinib in studies B7931005 (NCT02974868) and B7981015 (NCT03732807) received 50 mg ritlecitinib QD for 36 months in treatment period 1. After completion of treatment period 1, participants not continuing to treatment period 2 entered a follow-up period of 4 weeks. Participants from countries where ritlecitinib was not commercially available continued to receive 50 mg ritlecitinib QD in treatment period 2 for a maximum of 24 months or until availability of commercial product in their country, or until the sponsor terminated the study in that country, whichever occurred first. Participants who permanently discontinued study treatment entered an Observation Period where they completed the scheduled study visits for approximately 2 years or until study end, whichever occurred first. Adolescent participants who did not achieve a SALT score of 20 or less by Month 6 were required to discontinue their participation in the study. | 603 |
| Vaccine Sub-study: Tdap With or Without Meningococcal ACWY Vaccine Participants who received at least 6 months of treatment with ritlecitinib 50 mg QD in the Main study continued to receive the study treatment in the main study while participating in vaccine sub-study. Participants were administered a single dose of Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccine with or without a single dose of meningococcal ACWY vaccine intramuscularly on Day 1 of the sub-study. | 17 |
| Total | 1,069 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Tdap With or Without Meningococcal ACWY Vaccine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Main Study >=65 Years | 25 Participants | 19 Participants | 6 Participants | — |
| Age, Customized Main Study From 12 to <18 Years | 156 Participants | 80 Participants | 76 Participants | — |
| Age, Customized Main Study From 18 to <45 Years | 631 Participants | 360 Participants | 271 Participants | — |
| Age, Customized Main Study From 45 to <64 Years | 240 Participants | 144 Participants | 96 Participants | — |
| Age, Customized Vaccine Substudy >=65 Years | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized Vaccine Substudy From 12 to <18 Years | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized Vaccine Substudy From 18 to <45 Years | 10 Participants | — | — | 10 Participants |
| Age, Customized Vaccine Substudy From 45 to <64 Years | 7 Participants | — | — | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Main Study Hispanic or Latino | 131 Participants | 76 Participants | 55 Participants | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Main Study Not Hispanic or Latino | 906 Participants | 523 Participants | 383 Participants | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Main Study Unknown or Not Reported | 15 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants | — | — | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Not Hispanic or Latino | 13 Participants | — | — | 13 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study American Indian or Alaska Native | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study Asian | 242 Participants | 146 Participants | 96 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study Black or African American | 37 Participants | 21 Participants | 16 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study More than one race | 13 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study Unknown or Not Reported | 16 Participants | 3 Participants | 13 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Main Study White | 733 Participants | 423 Participants | 310 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Asian | 3 Participants | — | — | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Black or African American | 1 Participants | — | — | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy More than one race | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Vaccine Substudy White | 13 Participants | — | — | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Main Study Female | 664 Participants | 375 Participants | 289 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Main Study Male | 388 Participants | 228 Participants | 160 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Vaccine Substudy Female | 12 Participants | — | — | 12 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Vaccine Substudy Male | 5 Participants | — | — | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 447 | 1 / 603 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 13 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 309 / 447 | 372 / 603 | 3 / 17 | 1 / 13 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 33 / 447 | 43 / 603 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 13 |
Outcome results
Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit
Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate \[beats per minute (bpm)\] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP\<90mmHg, DBP\<50 mmHg and pulse rate\<40mmHg.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <50 | 11 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 increase | 39 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 decrease | 45 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Pulse rate (bpm): Value <40 | 1 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Pulse rate (bpm): Value >120 | 0 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): Value <90 | 13 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 increase | 18 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 decrease | 22 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 decrease | 30 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <50 | 15 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Pulse rate (bpm): Value >120 | 1 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 increase | 70 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 increase | 42 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 decrease | 51 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): Value <90 | 30 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit | Pulse rate (bpm): Value <40 | 3 Participants |
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit
Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (\<0.8\*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN), Prothrombin Time(\>1.1\*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5\*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (\>3.0\*ULN); Albumin, Urate (\<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol \>1.3\*ULN; Cholesterol \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium \< 0.9x LLN & \> 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite \>=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes \>=20; Epithelial Cells\>=6, Hyaline Cast\>1; Bacteria\>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, the Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the total number of participants evaluable for laboratory abnormalities, i.e. the number with at least one observation of the given laboratory test while on study treatment or during lag time (35 days after the last dose).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit | 390 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit | 490 Participants |
Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | SAEs | 30 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 36 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | SAEs | 42 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 46 Participants |
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit | 401 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit | 515 Participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response
Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: \>=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was \<=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR \>=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was \>2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAS) was defined as all participants from this sub-study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response | 62.5 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032).
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | -2.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.32 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | -53.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.39 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | -37.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.12 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | -53.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.57 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | -54.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.93 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | -23.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.88 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | -55.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.01 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | -48.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.2 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | -56.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.69 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | -51.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.43 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | -56.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.04 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | -44.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.73 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | -68.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.18 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | -61.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.82 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | -42.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.48 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | -47.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.33 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | -52.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.05 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | -57.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.81 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | -63.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.41 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | -65.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.16 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | -66.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.43 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | -65.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.62 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | -67.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.53 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | -67.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.55 |
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms with responses scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations with responses scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score was calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 1: Emotional Symptoms | -0.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.683 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 3: Emotional Symptoms | -0.61 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.867 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 6: Emotional Symptoms | -0.77 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.012 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 9: Emotional Symptoms | -0.95 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.091 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 12: Emotional Symptoms | -1.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.161 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 18: Emotional Symptoms | -1.07 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.174 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 24: Emotional Symptoms | -1.12 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.232 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 36: Emotional Symptoms | -1.20 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.246 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 1: Activity Limitations | -0.09 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.641 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 3: Activity Limitations | -0.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.667 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 6: Activity Limitations | -0.27 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.719 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 9: Activity Limitations | -0.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.781 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 12: Activity Limitations | -0.36 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.793 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 18: Activity Limitations | -0.40 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 24: Activity Limitations | -0.43 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.824 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 36: Activity Limitations | -0.43 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.858 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 36: Activity Limitations | -0.53 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.859 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 1: Emotional Symptoms | -0.84 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.036 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 1: Activity Limitations | -0.36 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.789 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 3: Emotional Symptoms | -0.86 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.055 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 12: Activity Limitations | -0.51 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.871 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 6: Emotional Symptoms | -0.95 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.087 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 3: Activity Limitations | -0.38 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.811 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 9: Emotional Symptoms | -0.95 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.123 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 24: Activity Limitations | -0.52 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 12: Emotional Symptoms | -1.04 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.128 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 6: Activity Limitations | -0.44 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.829 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 18: Emotional Symptoms | -1.11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.129 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 18: Activity Limitations | -0.51 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.869 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 24: Emotional Symptoms | -1.07 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.172 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 9: Activity Limitations | -0.45 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.857 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations | Month 36: Emotional Symptoms | -1.11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.204 |
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | -0.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | -0.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.14 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | -1.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.01 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.21 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | -1.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.46 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.52 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.46 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | -1.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.48 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | -1.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.33 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.45 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.46 |
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | -0.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.27 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | -0.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | -0.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | -1.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.75 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | -0.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | -1.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.16 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | -0.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.11 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | -0.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.97 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | -52.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.98 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | -55.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.48 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | -53.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | -56.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.99 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | -2.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.94 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | -23.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.51 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | -53.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.79 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | -36.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.07 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | -50.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.89 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | -44.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.71 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | -54.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.81 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | -47.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.34 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | -67.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.49 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | -62.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.88 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | -41.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.34 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | -64.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.64 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | -65.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.43 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | -65.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.67 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | -60.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.17 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | -67.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.42 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | -68.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.17 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | -46.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.32 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | -52.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.26 |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | -56.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.89 |
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of Study
Vital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of Study
Following laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study
Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of Study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of Study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.
Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline
EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS without normal EBA score at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 6 | 37.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 18 | 59.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 3 | 22.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 24 | 61.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 12 | 55.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 36 | 65.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 1 | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 36 | 69.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 1 | 38.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 3 | 43.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 6 | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 12 | 60.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 18 | 64.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline | Month 24 | 67.9 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline
ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS without normal ELA score at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 6 | 36.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 18 | 62.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 3 | 17.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 24 | 66.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 12 | 54.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 36 | 69.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 1 | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 36 | 70.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 1 | 37.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 3 | 42.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 6 | 47.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 12 | 56.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 18 | 61.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline | Month 24 | 68.1 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 22.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 45.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 57.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 62.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 69.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 70.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 70.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 72.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 74.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 77.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 77.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 70.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 38.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 67.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 43.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 70.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 51.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 68.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 57.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 70.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 62.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 68.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 65.5 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 44.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 69.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 61.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 69.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 21.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 73.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 67.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 76.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 55.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 76.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 68.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 70.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 42.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 51.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 56.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 61.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 64.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 67.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 68.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 70.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 70.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 37.4 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 16.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 68.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 81.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 57.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 82.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 76.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 83.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 69.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 55.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 66.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 79.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 72.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 74.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 2.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 27.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 51.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 60.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 66.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 72.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 74.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 74.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 74.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 77.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 78.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 79.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 69.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 36.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 64.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 41.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 69.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 51.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 66.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 56.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 69.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 61.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 66.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 63.4 Percentage of Participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Overall Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 56.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 17.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 39.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 50.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 61.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 65.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 65.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 67.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 69.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 70.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 71.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 61.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 54.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 28.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 59.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 33.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 55.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 39.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 62.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 45.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 49.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 57.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 53.9 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 2.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 27.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 50.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 59.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 65.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 70.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 71.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 72.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 73.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 76.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 78.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 79.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 69.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 35.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 63.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 40.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 69.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 50.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 66.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 55.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 69.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 60.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 66.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 62.3 Percentage of Participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 16.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 37.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 49.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 55.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 59.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 62.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 62.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 66.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 68.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 69.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 70.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 32 | 61.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 1 | 27.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 18 | 53.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 3 | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 28 | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 6 | 39.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 21 | 54.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 9 | 44.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 36 | 61.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 12 | 48.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 24 | 56.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36 | Month 15 | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Improvement on HADS anxiety score was considered as achieving a normal anxiety subscale score indicative of an absence of anxiety. Among adults, a HADS-A score of 0-7 was considered normal; for adolescents, a HADS-A score of 0-8 was considered normal. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from the FAS with a score indicative of anxiety at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 51.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 46.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 54.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 69.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 73.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 62.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 63.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 54.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 64.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 59.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 61.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 62.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 62.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 57.8 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Improvement on HADS depression score was considered as achieving a normal depression subscale score indicative of an absence of depression. Among adults, a HADS-D score of 0-7 was considered normal; for adolescents, a HADS-D score of 0-6 was considered normal. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS included was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from the FAS with a score indicative of depression at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 53.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 63.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 70.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 65.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 58.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 84.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 36 | 75.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 1 | 56.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 12 | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 3 | 52.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 24 | 62.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 6 | 70.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 18 | 63.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 | Month 9 | 69.4 Percentage of participants |
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline
AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss from the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes and body using a 5 point scale that ranged from 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with AAPPO domain scores of 0 = no hair loss or 1 = a little hair loss, among participants with score \>=2 at baseline are reported.
Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. Participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS who had an AAPPO baseline score \>=2 who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 9.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Scalp | 27.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Scalp | 45.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Scalp | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Scalp | 58.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Scalp | 62.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Scalp | 67.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Scalp | 69.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Scalp | 9.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 32.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 49.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 55.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 60.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 60.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 63.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 8.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 35.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 45.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 54.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 56.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 61.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 64.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 69.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on body | 14.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on body | 24.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on body | 34.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on body | 43.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on body | 52.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on body | 55.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on body | 59.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on body | 65.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on body | 62.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Scalp | 37.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 40.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Scalp | 38.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on body | 31.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Scalp | 46.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 44.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Scalp | 49.8 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on body | 49.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Scalp | 52.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 46.6 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Scalp | 57.2 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on body | 36.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Scalp | 60.7 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 54.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Scalp | 58.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on body | 60.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 1: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 42.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 55.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 3: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 44.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on body | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 6: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 49.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 62.3 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on body | 56.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 12: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 55.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 65.0 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 18: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 60.1 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 9: Current hair loss on body | 46.9 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 24: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 64.4 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Eyelashes | 67.5 Percentage of participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline | Month 36: Current hair loss on Eyebrows | 64.7 Percentage of participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination
Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | 8.4 milli-international units (mIU)/mL |
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination
Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Fold change was defined as the ratio of the post-baseline result to the baseline result. The assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5 \* LLOQ except when pre-vaccination assay results is \< LLOQ while postvaccination result is \>= LLOQ, in which case the pre-vaccination value will be set to LLOQ.
Time frame: From Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) to Month 1
Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | 5.7 Fold change |
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination
Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) and Month 1
Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | Baseline | 5.7 Titers |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | Month 1 | 14.1 Titers |
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs | 3 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs | 1 Participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.
Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 0 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 0 Participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events.
Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)
Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs | 0 Participants |
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs | 0 Participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination
Percentage of participants with \>=4 times increase in anti-tetanus antibody level from baseline were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | 50 Percentage of participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination
Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | 100 Percentage of participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination
Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=1.0 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination | 100 Percentage of participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination
Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.4 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | 40 Percentage of Participants |
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination
Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.8 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Month 1
Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants) | Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination | 20 Percentage of Participants |