Skip to content

Long-Term PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

A PHASE 3 OPEN-LABEL, MULTI-CENTER, LONG-TERM STUDY INVESTIGATING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-06651600 IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT PARTICIPANTS WITH ALOPECIA AREATA

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04006457
Acronym
ALLEGRO-LT
Enrollment
1057
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-07-18
Completion date
2026-02-26
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia Areata

Keywords

Alopecia, Alopecia Areata, Alopecia totalis, Alopecia universalis, Hair loss, JAK inhibitor, PF-06651600, Ritlecitinib

Brief summary

This is a global Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an investigational study drug (called PF-06651600) in adults and adolescents (12 years and older) who have alopecia areata. Eligible patients from the prior studies B7931005 (NCT02974868) and B7981015 (NCT03732807) will have an opportunity to enroll as well as patients who have not previously participated in either of these studies. The study is open-label and all patients entering the study will receive active study drug. A sub-study of approximately 60 adult patients who are participating in the B7981032 study will be conducted at select sites in the US, Australia and Canada. The sub-study will evaluate the immune response to tetanus and meningococcal vaccines in patients who have received a minimum of 6 months of 50 mg PF-06651600.

Interventions

DRUGPF-06651600

50 mg oral tablets/capsules

BIOLOGICALTetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study

BIOLOGICALMeningococcal (groups A, C, W-135 and Y [ACWY]) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine

Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: * Clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) with no other cause of hair loss. Androgenetic alopecia coexistent with AA is allowed. * De novo participants \>=12 to \<18 years of age: \>=50% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis * De novo participants \>=18 years of age and participants from Study B7931005 or B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: \>=25% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis * No evidence of terminal scalp hair regrowth within 6 months (de novo only) * Current episode of terminal scalp hair loss \<=10 years (de novo only)

Exclusion criteria

- For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with \>30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: * Hearing loss with progression over previous 5 years, or sudden hearing loss, or middle or inner ear disease, or other auditory condition that is considered acute, fluctuating or progressive * History of or current malignancies with the exception of adequately treated or excised non metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ * History of a single episode of disseminated herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex, or a history of more than one episode of localized, dermatomal herpes zoster * Infection requiring hospitalization, or parenteral antimicrobial therapy within 6 months prior to Day 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up VisitFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up VisitFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.
Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate \[beats per minute (bpm)\] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP\<90mmHg, DBP\<50 mmHg and pulse rate\<40mmHg.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up VisitFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (\<0.8\*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN), Prothrombin Time(\>1.1\*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5\*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (\>3.0\*ULN); Albumin, Urate (\<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol \>1.3\*ULN; Cholesterol \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium \< 0.9x LLN \& \> 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite \>=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes \>=20; Epithelial Cells\>=6, Hyaline Cast\>1; Bacteria\>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster ResponseMonth 1Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: \>=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was \<=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR \>=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was \>2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of StudyFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of studyAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of StudyFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of studyAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of StudyFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of studyVital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.
Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of StudyFrom start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of studyFollowing laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032).
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineAt Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineAt Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsBaseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms with responses scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations with responses scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score was calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineBaseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss from the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes and body using a 5 point scale that ranged from 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with AAPPO domain scores of 0 = no hair loss or 1 = a little hair loss, among participants with score \>=2 at baseline are reported.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Improvement on HADS depression score was considered as achieving a "normal" depression subscale score indicative of an absence of depression. Among adults, a HADS-D score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-D score of 0-6 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Improvement on HADS anxiety score was considered as achieving a "normal" anxiety subscale score indicative of an absence of anxiety. Among adults, a HADS-A score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-A score of 0-8 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap VaccinationMonth 1Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=1.0 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap VaccinationMonth 1Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap VaccinationMonth 1Percentage of participants with \>=4 times increase in anti-tetanus antibody level from baseline were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap VaccinationFrom Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) to Month 1Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Fold change was defined as the ratio of the post-baseline result to the baseline result. The assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5 \* LLOQ except when pre-vaccination assay results is \< LLOQ while postvaccination result is \>= LLOQ, in which case the pre-vaccination value will be set to LLOQ.
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap VaccinationMonth 1Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY VaccinationMonth 1Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.8 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY VaccinationMonth 1Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.4 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY VaccinationBaseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) and Month 1Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEsFrom day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events.
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEsFrom day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationFrom day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORPfizer CT.gov Call Center

Pfizer

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of Main study and vaccine sub-study. A total of 1052 participants were enrolled in the Main study and a total of 17 participants who received at least 6 months of study treatment in the main study were enrolled in the vaccine sub-study. Results are reported at primary completion date (PCD).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)
Participants with a clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) received ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 4 weeks followed by 50 mg ritlecitinib QD for 35 months during treatment period 1. After completion of treatment period 1, participants not continuing to treatment period 2 entered a follow-up period of 4 weeks. Participants from countries where ritlecitinib was not commercially available continued to receive 50 mg ritlecitinib QD in treatment period 2 for a maximum of 24 months or until availability of commercial product in their country, or until the sponsor terminated the study in that country, whichever occurred first. Participants who permanently discontinued study treatment entered an Observation Period where they completed the scheduled study visits for approximately 2 years or until study end, whichever occurred first.Adolescent participants who did not achieve a SALT score of 20 or less by Month 6 were required to discontinue their participation in the study.
449
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)
Participants with a clinical diagnosis of AA who received ritlecitinib in studies B7931005 (NCT02974868) and B7981015 (NCT03732807) received 50 mg ritlecitinib QD for 36 months in treatment period 1. After completion of treatment period 1, participants not continuing to treatment period 2 entered a follow-up period of 4 weeks. Participants from countries where ritlecitinib was not commercially available continued to receive 50 mg ritlecitinib QD in treatment period 2 for a maximum of 24 months or until availability of commercial product in their country, or until the sponsor terminated the study in that country, whichever occurred first. Participants who permanently discontinued study treatment entered an Observation Period where they completed the scheduled study visits for approximately 2 years or until study end, whichever occurred first. Adolescent participants who did not achieve a SALT score of 20 or less by Month 6 were required to discontinue their participation in the study.
603
Vaccine Sub-study: Tdap With or Without Meningococcal ACWY Vaccine
Participants who received at least 6 months of treatment with ritlecitinib 50 mg QD in the Main study continued to receive the study treatment in the main study while participating in vaccine sub-study. Participants were administered a single dose of Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccine with or without a single dose of meningococcal ACWY vaccine intramuscularly on Day 1 of the sub-study.
17
Total1,069

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMain Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Tdap With or Without Meningococcal ACWY Vaccine
Age, Customized
Main Study
>=65 Years
25 Participants19 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
Main Study
From 12 to <18 Years
156 Participants80 Participants76 Participants
Age, Customized
Main Study
From 18 to <45 Years
631 Participants360 Participants271 Participants
Age, Customized
Main Study
From 45 to <64 Years
240 Participants144 Participants96 Participants
Age, Customized
Vaccine Substudy
>=65 Years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Vaccine Substudy
From 12 to <18 Years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Vaccine Substudy
From 18 to <45 Years
10 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
Vaccine Substudy
From 45 to <64 Years
7 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Hispanic or Latino
131 Participants76 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Not Hispanic or Latino
906 Participants523 Participants383 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Asian
242 Participants146 Participants96 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Black or African American
37 Participants21 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
More than one race
13 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Main Study
White
733 Participants423 Participants310 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Vaccine Substudy
White
13 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Main Study
Female
664 Participants375 Participants289 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Main Study
Male
388 Participants228 Participants160 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Vaccine Substudy
Female
12 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Vaccine Substudy
Male
5 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 4471 / 6030 / 170 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
309 / 447372 / 6033 / 171 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 44743 / 6030 / 170 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit

Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate \[beats per minute (bpm)\] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP\<90mmHg, DBP\<50 mmHg and pulse rate\<40mmHg.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <5011 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 increase39 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 decrease45 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitPulse rate (bpm): Value <401 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitPulse rate (bpm): Value >1200 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): Value <9013 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 increase18 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 decrease22 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 decrease30 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): value <5015 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitPulse rate (bpm): Value >1201 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 increase70 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): change>=30 increase42 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg): change >=20 decrease51 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitSystolic blood pressure (mmHg): Value <9030 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up VisitPulse rate (bpm): Value <403 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit

Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (\<0.8\*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN), Prothrombin Time(\>1.1\*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5\*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (\>3.0\*ULN); Albumin, Urate (\<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol \>1.3\*ULN; Cholesterol \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium \< 0.9x LLN & \> 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite \>=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes \>=20; Epithelial Cells\>=6, Hyaline Cast\>1; Bacteria\>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, the Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the total number of participants evaluable for laboratory abnormalities, i.e. the number with at least one observation of the given laboratory test while on study treatment or during lag time (35 days after the last dose).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit390 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit490 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up VisitSAEs30 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up VisitAEs Leading to Discontinuation36 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up VisitSAEs42 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up VisitAEs Leading to Discontinuation46 Participants
Primary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit401 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit515 Participants
Primary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response

Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: \>=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was \<=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR \>=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was \>2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAS) was defined as all participants from this sub-study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response62.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032).

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1-2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 18-53.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.39
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 6-37.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.12
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 21-53.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.57
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 24-54.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.93
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3-23.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.88
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 28-55.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.01
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12-48.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.2
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 32-56.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.69
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 15-51.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.43
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 36-56.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.04
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 9-44.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.73
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 36-68.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.18
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12-61.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.82
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1-42.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.48
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3-47.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.33
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 6-52.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.05
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 9-57.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.81
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 15-63.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.41
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 18-65.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.16
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 21-66.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.43
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 24-65.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.62
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 28-67.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.53
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 32-67.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.55
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations

AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms with responses scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations with responses scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score was calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 1: Emotional Symptoms-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.683
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 3: Emotional Symptoms-0.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.867
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 6: Emotional Symptoms-0.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.012
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 9: Emotional Symptoms-0.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.091
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 12: Emotional Symptoms-1.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.161
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 18: Emotional Symptoms-1.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.174
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 24: Emotional Symptoms-1.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.232
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 36: Emotional Symptoms-1.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.246
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 1: Activity Limitations-0.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.641
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 3: Activity Limitations-0.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.667
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 6: Activity Limitations-0.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.719
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 9: Activity Limitations-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.781
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 12: Activity Limitations-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.793
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 18: Activity Limitations-0.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 24: Activity Limitations-0.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.824
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 36: Activity Limitations-0.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.858
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 36: Activity Limitations-0.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.859
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 1: Emotional Symptoms-0.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.036
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 1: Activity Limitations-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.789
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 3: Emotional Symptoms-0.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.055
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 12: Activity Limitations-0.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.871
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 6: Emotional Symptoms-0.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.087
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 3: Activity Limitations-0.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.811
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 9: Emotional Symptoms-0.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.123
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 24: Activity Limitations-0.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 12: Emotional Symptoms-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.128
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 6: Activity Limitations-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.829
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 18: Emotional Symptoms-1.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.129
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 18: Activity Limitations-0.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.869
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 24: Emotional Symptoms-1.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.172
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 9: Activity Limitations-0.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.857
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsMonth 36: Emotional Symptoms-1.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.204
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 6-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 9-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 12-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 18-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 24-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 36-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 36-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 12-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 24-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.48
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 6-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 18-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.45
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 9-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 6-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 9-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 12-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 18-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 24-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 36-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 36-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 12-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 24-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 6-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 18-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 9-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Secondary

Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 18-52.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.98
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 32-55.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.48
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 21-53.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 36-56.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.99
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1-2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.94
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3-23.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.51
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 24-53.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.79
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 6-36.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.07
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 15-50.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.89
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 9-44.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.71
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 28-54.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.81
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12-47.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.34
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 28-67.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.49
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 15-62.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.88
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1-41.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.34
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 18-64.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.64
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 21-65.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.43
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 24-65.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.67
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12-60.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.17
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 32-67.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.42
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 36-68.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.17
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3-46.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.32
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 6-52.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.26
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 9-56.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.89
Secondary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of Study

Vital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure \[Millimeters of mercury, mmHg\]) and pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

Secondary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of Study

Following laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

Secondary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of Study

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

Secondary

Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of Study

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.

Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline

EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS without normal EBA score at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 637.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 1859.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 322.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 2461.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 1255.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 3665.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 14.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 3669.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 138.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 343.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 650.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 1260.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 1864.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at BaselineMonth 2467.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline

ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS without normal ELA score at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 636.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 1862.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 317.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 2466.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 1254.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 3669.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 13.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 3670.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 137.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 342.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 647.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 1256.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 1861.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at BaselineMonth 2468.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 11.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 322.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 645.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 957.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1262.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1569.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1870.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2170.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2472.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2874.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3277.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3677.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3270.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 138.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1867.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 343.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2870.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 651.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2168.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 957.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3670.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1262.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2468.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1565.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 644.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2169.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1261.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2469.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 321.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2873.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 10.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1567.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3276.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 955.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3676.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1868.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3670.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 342.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 651.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 956.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1261.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1564.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1866.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2167.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2468.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2870.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3270.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 137.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 116.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1278.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 668.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1881.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 357.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2482.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 976.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3683.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 969.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 155.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 359.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 666.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3679.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1272.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1874.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2478.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12.6 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 327.8 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 651.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 960.4 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1266.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1572.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1874.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2174.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2474.8 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2877.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3278.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3679.3 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3269.3 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 136.6 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1864.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 341.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2869.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 651.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2166.6 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 956.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3669.9 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1261.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2466.9 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1563.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Overall Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1256.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 11.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 317.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 639.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 950.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1561.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1865.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2165.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2467.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2869.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3270.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3671.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3261.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1854.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 128.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2859.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 333.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2155.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 639.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3662.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 945.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1249.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2457.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1553.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 12.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 327.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 650.1 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 959.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1265.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1570.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1871.8 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2172.8 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2473.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2876.8 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3278.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3679.1 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3269.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 135.6 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1863.5 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 340.2 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2869.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 650.4 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2166.3 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 955.9 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3669.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1260.0 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2466.7 Percentage of Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1562.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score \<= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 10.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 316.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 637.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 949.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1255.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1559.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1862.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2162.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2466.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2868.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3269.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3670.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3261.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 127.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1853.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 332.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2859.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 639.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2154.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 944.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 3661.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1248.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 2456.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36Month 1552.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Improvement on HADS anxiety score was considered as achieving a normal anxiety subscale score indicative of an absence of anxiety. Among adults, a HADS-A score of 0-7 was considered normal; for adolescents, a HADS-A score of 0-8 was considered normal. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from the FAS with a score indicative of anxiety at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 151.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 346.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 653.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 950.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1254.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1869.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2473.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3662.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3663.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 154.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1264.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 359.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2461.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 662.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1862.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 957.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Improvement on HADS depression score was considered as achieving a normal depression subscale score indicative of an absence of depression. Among adults, a HADS-D score of 0-7 was considered normal; for adolescents, a HADS-D score of 0-6 was considered normal. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS included was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. All participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from the FAS with a score indicative of depression at baseline who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 153.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 363.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 670.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 965.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1258.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1884.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2483.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3680.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 3675.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 156.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1272.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 352.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 2462.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 670.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 1863.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36Month 969.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline

AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss from the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes and body using a 5 point scale that ranged from 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with AAPPO domain scores of 0 = no hair loss or 1 = a little hair loss, among participants with score \>=2 at baseline are reported.

Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

Population: FAS was defined as all participants regardless of whether they received study intervention. Participants reported under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed included all participants from FAS who had an AAPPO baseline score \>=2 who contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Eyebrows9.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Scalp27.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Scalp45.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Scalp55.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Scalp58.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Scalp62.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Scalp67.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Scalp69.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Scalp9.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Eyebrows32.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Eyebrows43.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Eyebrows49.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Eyebrows55.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Eyebrows60.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Eyebrows60.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Eyebrows63.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Eyelashes8.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Eyelashes35.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Eyelashes45.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Eyelashes54.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Eyelashes56.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Eyelashes61.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Eyelashes64.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Eyelashes69.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on body14.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on body24.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on body34.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on body43.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on body52.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on body55.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on body59.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on body65.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on body62.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Scalp37.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Eyelashes40.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Scalp38.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on body31.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Scalp46.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Eyelashes44.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Scalp49.8 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on body49.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Scalp52.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Eyelashes46.6 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Scalp57.2 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on body36.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Scalp60.7 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Eyelashes54.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Scalp58.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on body60.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 1: Current hair loss on Eyebrows42.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Eyelashes55.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 3: Current hair loss on Eyebrows44.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on body41.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 6: Current hair loss on Eyebrows49.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Eyelashes62.3 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on Eyebrows52.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on body56.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 12: Current hair loss on Eyebrows55.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Eyelashes65.0 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 18: Current hair loss on Eyebrows60.1 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 9: Current hair loss on body46.9 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 24: Current hair loss on Eyebrows64.4 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Eyelashes67.5 Percentage of participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at BaselineMonth 36: Current hair loss on Eyebrows64.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination8.4 milli-international units (mIU)/mL
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Fold change was defined as the ratio of the post-baseline result to the baseline result. The assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5 \* LLOQ except when pre-vaccination assay results is \< LLOQ while postvaccination result is \>= LLOQ, in which case the pre-vaccination value will be set to LLOQ.

Time frame: From Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) to Month 1

Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination5.7 Fold change
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5\* LLOQ.

Time frame: Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) and Month 1

Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY VaccinationBaseline5.7 Titers
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY VaccinationMonth 114.1 Titers
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.

Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs3 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs1 Participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events.

Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

Population: SAS was defined as all participants from the vaccine sub study who received at least 1 vaccine (Tdap or meningococcal ACWY).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs0 Participants
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (Roll-over Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

Percentage of participants with \>=4 times increase in anti-tetanus antibody level from baseline were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination50 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level \>=1.0 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-Tdap was defined as all participants who received the Tdap vaccine (with or without the meningococcal ACWY vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.4 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination40 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

Percentage of participants with hSBA titer \>=1.8 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: FAS-ACWY was defined as all participants who received the meningococcal ACWY vaccine (with or without the Tdap vaccine). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Ritlecitinib 200 mg/ 50 mg QD (de Novo Participants)Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination20 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026