Skip to content

Comparing SonoVue With Sonazoid Using CEUS-LIRADS in HCC

Comparing SonoVue With Sonazoid in the Performance of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS-LIRADS) in Diagosing HCC: a Prospective Blind Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04006275
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2019-06-30
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2019-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis, Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, cirhossi, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, LI-RADS

Brief summary

The new version of CEUS LI-RADS published at 2018(version 2017). In this study, the investigators aim to investigate the diagnosing performance of CEUS LI-RADS by administrating different contrast agents (SonoVue/ Sonazoid).

Detailed description

Independent radiologists from department of ultrasound will report their diagnosing results according to CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 without getting any information about patients. The researcher of this subject will collect all results and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LI-RADS and the diagnosing performance with different contrast agents.

Interventions

DRUGSonovue and Sonazoid

Subjects were randomized to receive SonoVue firstly and Sonazid secondly after wash out period. Between the wash out period(at least 30min) and after whole trial, the patients was carefully observed at our department for at least 30min. contast agent dose: Sonazoid (0.12 μL/kg of perflubutane microbubbles) or SonoVue (2.4 mL) in a 1:1 ratio.

DRUGSonazoid and Sonovue

Subjects were randomized to receive Sonazoid firstly and SonoVue secondly after wash out period. Between the wash out period(at least 30min) and after whole trial, the patients was carefully observed at our department for at least 30min. contast agent dose: Sonazoid (0.12 μL/kg of perflubutane microbubbles) or SonoVue (2.4 mL) in a 1:1 ratio.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The sequence of sonovue or sonazoid is blind to participant. The data is blind to the radiologist who is plan to evalutaed the data using CEUS LIRADS version 2017 and the outcome assessor who calculated all data and do the statistical calculation.

Intervention model description

included patients receive both SonoVue and Sonazoid with a randomized crossover design. The wash out period is at least 30min to make sure the fore-inject contrast agent is clear in blood.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients at risk for HCC with focal liver lesion on conventional ultrasound. * history of cirrhosis. * historty of HBV infection.

Exclusion criteria

* systemic therapy with sorafenib * pretreat lesion * patients don't sign the informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CEUS LI-RADS Grades of SonoVue and Sonazoid agents in enrolled patients.6 monthsCEUS LI-RADS® v2017 which is published by ACR is a standardized system for technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection for contrast-enhanced ultrasound exams in patients at risk for developing HCC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-LI-RADS by different contrast agencies.6 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity are calculated using parameters such as ture postive, false positive, Ture negative, false negetive.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026