Skip to content

Optimal Interstimulus Interval For Consecutive H-Reflex Responses In Patients With Spasticity

Optimal Interstimulus Interval For Consecutive H-Reflex Responses In Patients With Spasticity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04005937
Enrollment
16
Registered
2019-07-02
Start date
2019-06-30
Completion date
2019-07-17
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Hypertonia, Reflex, Abnormal

Keywords

muscle spindle, H reflex, spasticity

Brief summary

This study evaluates the optimal interstimulus interval for consecutive H-reflex responses in patients with spasticity.

Detailed description

This study will include 15 patients with spastic stroke patients H-reflex with different interstimulus interval of the plegic side soleus muscle will be tested. Subjects lay comfortably in the supine position on an examination bed. The subject will be asked not to contract the lower extremity muscles during the experiment. Surface EMG (SEMG) will be recorded from the plegic side soleus muscle using bipolar electrodes. These electrodes will be placed on the soleus muscle according to the SENIAM guideline.The reference electrode will be placed on medial malleolus. Prior to electrode placement, the skin will be shaved, lightly abraded, and cleaned with alcohol wipes. Self-adhesive, disposable, Ag-AgCl disc electrodes with a disc radius of 10 mm (KENDALL® Arbo; Coviden; Massachusetts, USA) will be used. To prevent the sway of electrode cables, it will be fixed to the body. SEMG and stimulator data will be obtained by using a data acquisition system (POWERLAB® ADInstruments Co, Oxford, United Kingdom). Sampling rate will be 10 kHz. The recorded data will be processed and analyzed offline using LabChart7® Software Version V7.3.3 (PowerLab® system ADInstruments, Oxford, United Kingdom). A cathode (5×5 mm) will be placed at the midpoint of popliteal fossa and an anode (10×10 cm) will be placed immediately proximal to the patella to evoke the H-reflex for monopolar stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve. A monophasic electrical current will be delivered as square pulses with a width of 1 ms by using a stimulator (FE155 Stimulator HC ADInstrument, Oxford UK). Taking into consideration study of Ozyurt et al, interstimulus interval will be selected as 10 seconds for determining the maximum H-reflex (Hmax). Then, Hmax and M-response (Mmax) will be determined. We will be tested four different ISI (10s, 5s, 3s and 1s) for stroke patients in this study. The stimulus intensity for tested H-reflex will be selected as a constant stimulus strength that will be 50 percent of the Hmax. Thirty consecutive stimuli will be delivered in separate sets for each tested ISI of 10, 5, 3 and 1s. The ISI sets will be tested in random order to negate any order effect. There will be a 15s of interval between sets. SEMG recordings will be filtered using a bandpass filter from 5 to 500 Hz. Then the peak-to-peak (P-P) amplitudes of H-reflex will be measured then normalized using by two different methods to estimate H-reflex suppression due to consecutive stimuli. In the first method, P-P amplitude of the first H-reflex response will be used as a control, and P-P amplitude of the second H-reflex response will be normalized by using the control for each ISI set. Thus, HPP2 / HPP1 ratio will be calculated. Similar to the previous method, the first H-reflex response will be used as the control in the second method. Unlike the first method, not only the second H-reflex response, but the remaining 29 H-responses will be normalized to the first H-response. P-P amplitude of the 29 normalized H-reflex responses will be averaged and HPP29/HPP1 ratio will be calculated. The peak-to-peak amplitude of the first H-reflex response will be measured then normalized to the Mmax (HPP1/Mmax) to compare H-reflexes between subjects and conditions.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTH-reflex

Electrical stimulation of Group Ia afferent of muscle spindle

Sponsors

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Effects of spasticity on consecutive H-reflex response in patients with hemiplegia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cerebrovascular stroke * Both sex

Exclusion criteria

* Duration after stroke is less than 20 days * Lesions in calf skin * Excessive spasticity (Ashworth 4) / Contracture (foot joint) * Absent of soleus spasticity * Peripheral nerve diseases / muscle diseases * Absent of H-reflex * Botulinum toxin injection within last 12 weeks * Anxiety * Patients with pain on test day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
H-reflex suppression1 dayChange in H-reflex amplitude throughout consecutive stimuli

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026