Skip to content

A Study of Mirikizumab (LY3074828) in Children and Teenagers With Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

A Multicenter, Open-Label PK Study of Mirikizumab in Pediatric Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04004611
Acronym
SHINE-1
Enrollment
26
Registered
2019-07-02
Start date
2020-05-18
Completion date
2023-03-15
Last updated
2024-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Interleukin-23 (IL-23) antibody, IL-23p19, Pediatric

Brief summary

This study was designed to evaluate how the body processes and removes mirikizumab. The study also evaluated safety and disease response in pediatric participants with UC taking mirikizumab. The study lasted about 52 weeks and included up to 18 visits.

Interventions

DRUGMirikizumab

Administered IV and SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants weighing \>10 kg * Participants must have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months before the planned start date for the study medications * Participants must have moderately to severely active UC as defined by a Modified Mayo Score (MMS) within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment * Participants must have evidence of UC extending proximal to the rectum * Participants must have demonstrated an inadequate response to, a loss of response to, or an intolerance to corticosteroids, immunomodulators, Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK-inhibitor) or to biologic therapies for UC

Exclusion criteria

* Participants must not have a current diagnosis of Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel disease-unclassified (indeterminate colitis), ulcerative proctitis, or primary sclerosing cholangitis * Participants must not have had surgery to remove part of their colon * Participants must not have current evidence of toxic megacolon * Participants must not have received any of the following for treatment of UC: cyclosporine or thalidomide within 30 days of screening; corticosteroid enemas, corticosteroid suppositories, or topical treatment with 5-aminosalicyclic acid within 1 week of screening endoscopy * Participants must not have had an inadequate response to Interleukin-12 p40 subunit antibody (anti-IL12p40) (e.g. ustekinumab) or had prior exposure to anti-IL-23p19 antibodies (e.g. risankizumab, brazikumab, guselkumab or tildrakizumab)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Clearance of MirikizumabPredose on week 4, 8, 12,16, 24, 36, 52 and post dose on week 0 and 8Clearance of mirikizumab was evaluated. The PK of mirikizumab is characterized at interim analysis points using mixed-effect (population PK) modelling approaches using the available induction and maintenance mirikizumab concentration data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants in Clinical ResponseWeek 52Clinical response at week 52 is defined as a decrease in the 9-point modified Mayo score (MMS) \[rectal bleeding, stool frequency and the endoscopic findings\] inclusive of ≥2 points and ≥30% from baseline with either a decrease of rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The MMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of three subscores: SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed); ES subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)
Percentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of CorticosteroidsWeek 52Corticosteroid-free clinical remission was defined as an SF subscore = 0 or 1, RB subscore = 0, ES ≤ 1 (excluding friability), and have not received corticosteroids for ≥ 12 weeks in the 52-Week Treatment Period. Each component subscore ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)Week 52The PUCAI is a clinician-administered, 6-item questionnaire that measures: abdominal pain; RB; stool consistency; number of stools; nocturnal stools; and activity level. For PUCAI score all items are answered as an average over the 'past 2 days'. A total disease activity score is calculated from 0 to 85, with Severe 65-85; Moderate:35-60; Mild:10-30, and None:\<10. The clinician will record the participant or caregiver/legal guardian responses for the PUCAI electronically as source data in the tablet device at appropriate visits. PUCAI clinical remission is defined as a PUCAI score of \<10 points.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAIWeek 52PUCAI clinical response is defined as a reduction in baseline PUCAI score of ≥20 points.
Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic RemissionWeek 52Endoscopic remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (excluding friability) at Week 52. ES subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 52Clinical remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a 9-point modified Mayo score (MMS) for rectal bleeding (RB) = 0, stool frequency (SF) = 0 or 1 and endoscopy (ES) = 0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of three subscores: SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed); ES subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding,ulceration.
Height Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Week 52Observed height velocity by gender and age group was calculated. Age groups for which this was summarized were 2 to \<8, 8 to \<12, and 12 to \<18. Observed height velocity by gender and age group was calculated at baseline according to the following formula: (Present Height \[cm\] - Previous Height \[cm\])/Interval (months) Between Measurements × 12.
Change From Baseline in Body WeightBaseline, Week 52Change from Baseline in body weight by gender and age group was calculated.
Percentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal RemissionWeek 52Histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission is defined as achieving both histologic remission and endoscopic remission. Histologic remission is defined as Geboes histological subscores of 0 for parameters: 2B (neutrophils in lamina propria), 3 (neutrophils in epithelium), 4 (crypt destruction), and 5 (erosion or ulceration).
Change From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Abdominal Pain NRS is a single participant-reported item that measures the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain) for 8-11 years old, and 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) for children \< 8 years old as completed by a caregiver and those 12-17 years old. Abdominal Pain NRS Score is calculated by averaging data from all available daily diary entries of abdominal pain NRS for a 7 day period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in the participant's Abdominal Pain NRS.
Change From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Abdominal Pain NRS is a single participant-reported item that measures the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain) for 8-11 years old, and 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) for children \< 8 years old as completed by a caregiver and those 12-17 years old. Abdominal Pain NRS Score is calculated by averaging data from all available daily diary entries of abdominal pain NRS for a 7 day period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in the participant's Abdominal Pain NRS.
Percentage of Participants in Symptomatic RemissionWeek 52Symptomatic remission at week 52 is defined as a Mayo score for RB=0, SF=0 or 1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline. SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed).

Countries

Canada, Israel, Japan, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Mirikizumab (Miri) dose groups to which pediatric participants are assigned at week (wk) 0 (for induction period) and at wk 12 (for maintenance period) are dependent on participant' s weight and their clinical response status at wk 12 for maintenance period. All participants who achieved a modified Mayo score (MMS) clinical response at wk 12 or wk 24 \[non-responders (NR) at wk 12 who received extended intravenous (IV) induction dosing for 12 more wks\] were eligible for the maintenance period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OL Induction Period: 5 mg/kg Miri IV
Participants (≤40 kg weight) received 5 mg/kg mirikizumab given as an IV infusion Q4W on weeks 0, 4, 8 for 12 weeks.
10
OL Induction Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV
Participants (≤40 kg weight) received 10 mg/kg mirikizumab given as an IV infusion Q4W on weeks 0, 4, 8 for 12 weeks.
5
OL Induction Period: 300 mg Miri IV
Participants (\>40 kg weight) received 300 mg mirikizumab given as an IV infusion Q4W on weeks 0, 4, 8 for 12 weeks.
11
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008
OL Induction and Maintenance PeriodAdverse Event001000000
OL Induction and Maintenance PeriodLack of Efficacy104000000
OL Induction and Maintenance PeriodWithdrawal by Parent or Guardian010000000
OL Maintenance Period (Wk 12-52)Adverse Event000000001
OL Maintenance Period (Wk 12-52)Lack of Efficacy000001103
OL Maintenance Period (Wk 12-52)Withdrawal by Parent or Guardian000010000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOL Induction Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IVOL Induction Period: 300 mg Miri IVOL Induction Period: 5 mg/kg Miri IVTotal
Age, Continuous11.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14
14.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
9.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.22
11.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.37
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants8 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants9 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants9 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants4 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 50 / 110 / 100 / 50 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 102 / 58 / 119 / 105 / 511 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 50 / 110 / 102 / 51 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Clearance of Mirikizumab

Clearance of mirikizumab was evaluated. The PK of mirikizumab is characterized at interim analysis points using mixed-effect (population PK) modelling approaches using the available induction and maintenance mirikizumab concentration data.

Time frame: Predose on week 4, 8, 12,16, 24, 36, 52 and post dose on week 0 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MirikizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Clearance of Mirikizumab0.000190 Liters per hour per kilogram (L/hr/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 52

The Abdominal Pain NRS is a single participant-reported item that measures the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain) for 8-11 years old, and 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) for children \< 8 years old as completed by a caregiver and those 12-17 years old. Abdominal Pain NRS Score is calculated by averaging data from all available daily diary entries of abdominal pain NRS for a 7 day period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in the participant's Abdominal Pain NRS.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the 7-day average of Abdominal Pain NRS measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 522 - <8 yearsNA score on a scale
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 522 - <8 yearsNA score on a scale
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 528 - <12 years-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 5212- <18 years-5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 5212- <18 years-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 522 - <8 years0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 5212- <18 yearsNA score on a scale
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain NRS Score at Week 5212- <18 years0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 12

The Abdominal Pain NRS is a single participant-reported item that measures the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain) for 8-11 years old, and 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) for children \< 8 years old as completed by a caregiver and those 12-17 years old. Abdominal Pain NRS Score is calculated by averaging data from all available daily diary entries of abdominal pain NRS for a 7 day period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in the participant's Abdominal Pain NRS.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the 7-day average of Abdominal Pain NRS measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 122 - <8 years-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 128 - <12 years-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 1212- <18 years-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 128 - <12 yearsNA score on a scale
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 1212- <18 years-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in 7-day Average of Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 1212- <18 years-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change from Baseline in body weight by gender and age group was calculated.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the body weight measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in Body WeightFemale: 2 - <8 yearsNA kg
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in Body WeightFemale: 8 - <12 years8 kgStandard Deviation 1.1
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in Body WeightFemale: 12 - <18 years9 kgStandard Deviation 7.1
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in Body WeightMale: 2 - <8 yearsNA kg
MirikizumabChange From Baseline in Body WeightMale: 12 - <18 years13 kgStandard Deviation 11.6
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in Body WeightMale: 12 - <18 yearsNA kg
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in Body WeightMale: 8 - <12 yearsNA kg
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in Body WeightFemale: 12 - <18 years9 kgStandard Deviation 3.5
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in Body WeightMale: 12 - <18 years2 kgStandard Deviation 3.2
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WChange From Baseline in Body WeightFemale: 12 - <18 years8 kgStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Height Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)

Observed height velocity by gender and age group was calculated. Age groups for which this was summarized were 2 to \<8, 8 to \<12, and 12 to \<18. Observed height velocity by gender and age group was calculated at baseline according to the following formula: (Present Height \[cm\] - Previous Height \[cm\])/Interval (months) Between Measurements × 12.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the height velocity measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MirikizumabHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Female: 2 - <8 yearsNA centimeter per year (cm/year)
MirikizumabHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Female: 8 - <12 years8.65 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 3.2
MirikizumabHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Female: 12 - <18 years4.54 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 4.2
MirikizumabHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Male: 2 - <8 yearsNA centimeter per year (cm/year)
MirikizumabHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Male: 12 - <18 years12.67 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 1
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Male: 12 - <18 yearsNA centimeter per year (cm/year)
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Male: 8 - <12 yearsNA centimeter per year (cm/year)
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Female: 12 - <18 years4.14 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 1.3
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Male: 12 - <18 years3.65 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 4.3
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WHeight Velocity (in Centimeters/Year)Female: 12 - <18 years2.97 centimeter per year (cm/year)Standard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission

Clinical remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a 9-point modified Mayo score (MMS) for rectal bleeding (RB) = 0, stool frequency (SF) = 0 or 1 and endoscopy (ES) = 0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of three subscores: SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed); ES subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding,ulceration.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat population (mITT): All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the clinical remission measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission62.5 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission55.6 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)

The PUCAI is a clinician-administered, 6-item questionnaire that measures: abdominal pain; RB; stool consistency; number of stools; nocturnal stools; and activity level. For PUCAI score all items are answered as an average over the 'past 2 days'. A total disease activity score is calculated from 0 to 85, with Severe 65-85; Moderate:35-60; Mild:10-30, and None:\<10. The clinician will record the participant or caregiver/legal guardian responses for the PUCAI electronically as source data in the tablet device at appropriate visits. PUCAI clinical remission is defined as a PUCAI score of \<10 points.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the clinical remission based on the PUCAI measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)75.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)77.8 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Response

Clinical response at week 52 is defined as a decrease in the 9-point modified Mayo score (MMS) \[rectal bleeding, stool frequency and the endoscopic findings\] inclusive of ≥2 points and ≥30% from baseline with either a decrease of rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The MMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of three subscores: SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed); ES subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the clinical response measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response75.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response88.9 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI

PUCAI clinical response is defined as a reduction in baseline PUCAI score of ≥20 points.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the clinical response based on the PUCAI measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI75.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI88.9 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Clinical Response Based on the PUCAI0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission

Endoscopic remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (excluding friability) at Week 52. ES subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the endoscopic remission measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission62.5 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission55.6 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission

Symptomatic remission at week 52 is defined as a Mayo score for RB=0, SF=0 or 1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline. SF subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). RB subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the symptomatic remission measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission75.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission66.7 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids

Corticosteroid-free clinical remission was defined as an SF subscore = 0 or 1, RB subscore = 0, ES ≤ 1 (excluding friability), and have not received corticosteroids for ≥ 12 weeks in the 52-Week Treatment Period. Each component subscore ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the modified mayo score clinical remission without the use of corticosteroids measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids62.5 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids55.6 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants Who Are in MMS Clinical Remission Without the Use of Corticosteroids0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission

Histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission is defined as achieving both histologic remission and endoscopic remission. Histologic remission is defined as Geboes histological subscores of 0 for parameters: 2B (neutrophils in lamina propria), 3 (neutrophils in epithelium), 4 (crypt destruction), and 5 (erosion or ulceration).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had the histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission measured correctly at baseline. Participants were analysed per their assigned treatment arm regardless of the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MirikizumabPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 100 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission62.5 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 200 mg Miri SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission44.4 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/50 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 10 mg/kg Miri IV/100 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission0.0 percentage of participants
Maintenance Period: 300 mg Miri IV/200 mg Miri SCPercentage of Participants With Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Remission0.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026